International Tax Review is part of the Delinian Group, Delinian Limited, 8 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX, Registered in England & Wales, Company number 00954730
Copyright © Delinian Limited and its affiliated companies 2023

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Canada: Canadian 2014 Budget: A Focus on base erosion and profit shifting



Soraya M Jamal

Bill Maclagan

Canada's 2014 budget gives a clear indication of the Canadian government's desire to address perceived limitations in, and abuses of, Canada's international tax system. In particular, Budget 2014 contains a number of measures which further Canada's "ongoing efforts to protect the Canadian tax base and ensure tax fairness". While the proposed measures align with the OECD's base erosion and profit shifting initiatives, the government has reaffirmed its intention to retain an internationally competitive tax system.

Treaty shopping

Following a short period public consultation, Budget 2014 announced that the Canadian government proposes to adopt a domestic rule to prevent treaty shopping which would apply to all Canadian tax treaties.

The proposed rule would permit the Canadian government to deny a treaty-based benefit if one of the main purposes for undertaking a relevant transaction was to obtain that benefit. It would be presumed that the main purpose test would be satisfied if the relevant treaty income was primarily used to pay an amount to a person who would not have been entitled to an equivalent or more favourable treaty benefit had the person received that income directly. As a relieving measure, it is proposed that the treaty-benefit may be provided to the extent reasonable in the circumstances. A safe harbour would apply in certain circumstances such as where the relevant treaty income is received as a result of substantial active business activities carried on in the relevant treaty jurisdiction.

The government has initiated a public consultation in respect of these proposals. The consultation outcome, along with the OECD's upcoming BEPS recommendations, will be relevant in determining Canada's approach to treaty shopping. While it is unclear if the proposals will be implemented, existing cross-border arrangements should be examined as Budget 2014 contains no indication that transitional relief will be provided to such arrangements.

Tax planning by multinational enterprises

Budget 2014 also announced a public consultation on issues relating to international tax planning by multinational enterprises. The consultation concentrates on five questions which consider the impact of tax planning by multinationals and the government's role in respect thereof.

Additionally, public input is being sought on the effective collection of sales tax on e-commerce sales by foreign-based vendors. In particular, consideration is being given to whether foreign-based vendors should be required to register with Canadian tax authorities and charge sale tax on e-commerce sales to Canadians.

Soraya M Jamal ( and Bill Maclagan (

Blake, Cassels & Graydon

Tel: +1 604 631 3300 Fax: +1 604 631 3309


more across site & bottom lb ros

More from across our site

Karl Berlin talks to Josh White about meeting the Fair Tax standard, the changing burden of country-by-country reporting, and how windfall taxes may hit renewable energy.
Sandy Markwick, head of the Tax Director Network (TDN) at Winmark, looks at the challenges of global mobility for tax management.
Taxpayers should look beyond the headline criteria of the simplification regime to ensure that their arrangements meet the arm’s-length standard, say Alejandro Ces and Mark Seddon of the EY New Zealand transfer pricing team.
In a recent webinar hosted by law firms Greenberg Traurig and Clayton Utz, officials at the IRS and ATO outlined their visions for 2023.
The Asia-Pacific awards research cycle has now begun – don’t miss on this opportunity be recognised in 2023
An intense period of lobbying and persuasion is under way as the UN secretary-general’s report on the future of international tax cooperation begins to take shape. Ralph Cunningham reports.
Fresh details of the European Commission’s state aid case against Amazon emerge, while a pension fund is suing Amgen over its tax dispute with the Internal Revenue Service.
The OECD’s rules may be impossible for businesses to manage, according to tax experts from companies including Shell.
Sanjay Sangvhi and Sahil Sheth of Khaitan & Co explore this legal concept and its implications for companies doing business in India.
The UK government is now committed to replacing the ‘super-deduction’ with a 100% capital allowances regime to offset the impact of the corporate tax rise to 25%.