All material subject to strictly enforced copyright laws. © 2022 ITR is part of the Euromoney Institutional Investor PLC group.

IRS issues proposed regulations affecting partnership transactions

irs.jpg

As the planning opportunities for avoiding, deferring or sheltering taxable gain on asset dispositions continue to be curtailed through changes in tax law and administration, taxpayers have turned to partnership transactions to accomplish these goals. Michael Sabbah, associate at Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen & Katz, explains why new proposed IRS regulations could limit the use of these types of transactions.

Partnership transactions have been used in a number of ways to mitigate the taxable gain on asset dispositions. For example, leveraged partnership dispositions involve the creation of a partnership between a ‘buyer’ and ‘seller’ to convey control and ultimate beneficial ownership of assets to the buyer while allowing the seller to extract cash up-front through partnership-level borrowings. These transactions turn on the allocation of such partnership borrowings to the seller for tax purposes.

The IRS has now issued proposed regulations that would, if finalised, restrict taxpayers’ ability to enter into such deferral transactions by altering the rules governing the allocation of partnership liabilities. While partnership liabilities are generally intended to be allocated to the partner who bears the economic risk of loss in respect of such liabilities, the IRS has become concerned that taxpayers were engaging in non-commercial arrangements to claim a share of partnership liabilities without bearing the corresponding economic burden.

The proposed regulations would impose new requirements for the recognition of a partner’s payment obligation in respect of partnership liabilities (for example, guarantees, indemnities, reimbursement obligations and similar arrangements) for the purpose of allocating such liabilities to the partners. Among the new requirements, a partner would be required to maintain an appropriate amount of net worth through the term of the payment obligation (or be subject to commercially reasonable contractual restrictions on the transfer of assets for inadequate consideration), receive arm’s-length consideration for assuming the payment obligation and be liable for up to the full amount of the payment obligation to the extent the liability is not otherwise satisfied by the partnership. The latter requirement would prevent the use of so-called bottom dollar guarantees to obtain a share of partnership liabilities.

The method for allocating partnership liabilities in respect of which no partner bears the economic risk of loss would also change. For purposes of determining a partner’s share of such liabilities, the proposed regulations would look to the relative value received by a partner in a hypothetical liquidation of the partnership instead of the allocation of significant items of income or gain or deductions attributable to the liabilities.

The proposed regulations would generally apply following their finalisation and publication, but would allow a partner’s share of recourse liabilities to be grandfathered under the current regulations for up to seven years.

Under the proposed regulations, the ability to engage in tax-advantaged transactions involving partnerships and partnership liabilities is likely to be limited to those transactions in which partners fully bear the associated economic risks.

Michael Sabbah is an associate at Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen & Katz. He is based in New York.

More from across our site

This week European Commission officials consider legal loopholes to secure minimum corporate taxation, while Cisco and Microsoft shareholders call for tax transparency.
The fast-food company’s tax settlement with French authorities strengthens the need for businesses to review their TP arrangements and documentation.
The full ALP model will be adopted through a new TP regime, which is set to boost the country’s investments and tax certainty.
Tax professionals have called on the UK government to reconsider its online sales tax as it would affect the economy at the worst time.
Tax professionals have called on companies to act urgently to meet e-invoicing compliance targets as the EU plans to ramp up digitisation.
In the wake of India’s ambitious 25-year plan for economic growth, ITR has partnered with leading tax commentators to discuss what the future will look like for India and for the rest of the world.
But experts cast doubt on HMRC's data and believe COVID-19 would have increased the revenue shortfall.
EY’s plan to separate its auditing and consulting businesses might lessen scrutiny from global regulators, but the brand identity could suffer, say sources.
Multinationals are asking world leaders to put a scale on carbon pricing to tackle climate change at the 48th G7 summit in Germany, from June 26 to 28.
The state secretary told the French press that the country continues to oppose pillar two’s global minimum tax rate following an Ecofin meeting last week.
We use cookies to provide a personalized site experience.
By continuing to use & browse the site you agree to our Privacy Policy.
I agree