Germany: Self-disclosure rule amendments bring good and bad news for corporates

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Germany: Self-disclosure rule amendments bring good and bad news for corporates

welbers.jpg

Hartwig Welbers

Self-disclosure allows tax evaders to avoid prosecution by coming forward of their own volition and paying the tax evaded. In principle, this opportunity is to be retained, although many believe that the current rules need to be tightened. The Ministry of Finance has now published draft amending legislation to that end. This subject is relevant to corporates in respect of their mass data filings of monthly VAT and payroll withholding. Because it is not easy for the authorities to distinguish between an error and a wilful attempt to defraud, there is a growing tendency to see corrected returns as failed self-disclosures (because they often cannot meet all the formal requirements) and to open criminal proceedings. The new ministerial draft now published tackles this issue by re-introducing partial self-disclosure for monthly or quarterly VAT or payroll withholding tax returns. A corrected return will not fail in respect of the corrections.

The bad news is that the tax audit preclusion of self-disclosure is to be tightened. Up to now, self-disclosure is no longer possible once a tax auditor sets foot on the premises. This point in time is to be brought forward to the notification to the company of the coming audit and audit concept is to be extended to include VAT, withholding tax and other specifically targeted reviews and examinations. The implications of this on very large corporations with a tax auditor more or less permanently in residence remain, however, open.

The Ministry of Finance does not see the new rules as burdensome on compliant businesses. This, however, overlooks the reality of the effort needed to prepare and substantiate a self-disclosure statement of more than errors in monthly or quarterly VAT or payroll withholding tax returns, say, to protect corporate officers from prosecution for having taken a risky position. This is, in particular, true as the limitations period will be extended to 10 years. One also needs to bear in mind the continuing discussion on a possible corporate criminal law to sanction a corporation for wrong-doing, rather than just the employees acting on the company's behalf. All things considered, effective supervision of a company's compliance is becoming more and more essential.

Hartwig Welbers (hartwig.welbers@de.pwc.com)

PwC

Tel: +49 711 25034 3165

Website: www.pwc.de

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

Meanwhile, one expert highlights the importance of separating Venezuela’s tax authority from direct political control after ‘lost decades and isolation’
With PMK 108, Indonesia has upgraded its tax transparency regime for the digital era, focusing on data quality, governance, and cross border exchange rather than expanding regulatory reach
In a popular LinkedIn post, Jeremie Beitel encouraged firms to invest in junior talent even if it doesn’t lead to their loyalty, though recruiters offered ITR a mixed assessment
Advisers who do not register for the new regime in time could be prevented from interacting with HMRC, the tax authority said
Valid pillar two objectives are still intact after the side-by-side agreement, but whether the framework is now settled is ‘a $64,000 question’, Morrison Foerster’s tax chair told ITR
Ian Halligan previously led Baker Tilly’s international tax services in the US
Exclusive ITR data emphasises that DEI does not affect in-house buying decisions – and it’s nothing to do with the US president
The firms made senior hires in Los Angeles and Cleveland respectively; in other news, South Korea reported an 11% rise in tax income, fuelled by a corporation tax boom
The ‘deeply flawed’ report is attempting to derail UN tax convention debates, the Tax Justice Network’s CEO said
Salim Rahim, a TP specialist, had been a partner at Baker McKenzie since 2010
Gift this article