Germany: Self-disclosure rule amendments bring good and bad news for corporates
International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 4 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX
Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2024

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Germany: Self-disclosure rule amendments bring good and bad news for corporates


Hartwig Welbers

Self-disclosure allows tax evaders to avoid prosecution by coming forward of their own volition and paying the tax evaded. In principle, this opportunity is to be retained, although many believe that the current rules need to be tightened. The Ministry of Finance has now published draft amending legislation to that end. This subject is relevant to corporates in respect of their mass data filings of monthly VAT and payroll withholding. Because it is not easy for the authorities to distinguish between an error and a wilful attempt to defraud, there is a growing tendency to see corrected returns as failed self-disclosures (because they often cannot meet all the formal requirements) and to open criminal proceedings. The new ministerial draft now published tackles this issue by re-introducing partial self-disclosure for monthly or quarterly VAT or payroll withholding tax returns. A corrected return will not fail in respect of the corrections.

The bad news is that the tax audit preclusion of self-disclosure is to be tightened. Up to now, self-disclosure is no longer possible once a tax auditor sets foot on the premises. This point in time is to be brought forward to the notification to the company of the coming audit and audit concept is to be extended to include VAT, withholding tax and other specifically targeted reviews and examinations. The implications of this on very large corporations with a tax auditor more or less permanently in residence remain, however, open.

The Ministry of Finance does not see the new rules as burdensome on compliant businesses. This, however, overlooks the reality of the effort needed to prepare and substantiate a self-disclosure statement of more than errors in monthly or quarterly VAT or payroll withholding tax returns, say, to protect corporate officers from prosecution for having taken a risky position. This is, in particular, true as the limitations period will be extended to 10 years. One also needs to bear in mind the continuing discussion on a possible corporate criminal law to sanction a corporation for wrong-doing, rather than just the employees acting on the company's behalf. All things considered, effective supervision of a company's compliance is becoming more and more essential.

Hartwig Welbers (


Tel: +49 711 25034 3165


more across site & bottom lb ros

More from across our site

There will always be multinationals trying to minimise tax by pushing the boundaries of their cross-border arrangements, Rob Heferen claimed
HMRC’s attempts to crack down on fraudulent tax relief claims are well-meaning, but the agency risks penalising genuinely innovative businesses, writes Katy Long of ForrestBrown
Argentina, Brazil, Mexico and South Africa are among the countries the OECD believes could benefit from the simplified TP rules
It comes despite an offshore enabler penalty existing in the UK throughout the entire period
It is extraordinary that tax advisers in the UK can offer their services without having to join a professional body. This looks like it is coming to an end, Ralph Cunningham writes
Meet the esteemed judges who are assessing the first-ever Social Impact Awards
The ‘big four’ firm has also vowed to spend more on nurturing junior talent; in other news, Blick Rothenberg has hired a pair of tax partners
However, making APAs harder to reach could ‘pose problems’ for UK businesses
Microsoft's director of benefits taxation tells ITR about having no normal days, family inspiration and what makes tax cool
The 61-year-old has run the firm’s UK business since 2020
Gift this article