International Tax Review is part of the Delinian Group, Delinian Limited, 8 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX, Registered in England & Wales, Company number 00954730
Copyright © Delinian Limited and its affiliated companies 2023

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Switzerland: Swiss cantons announce lower headline tax rates in anticipation of Swiss Corporate Tax Reform III

hess.jpg

kistler.jpg

Jackie Hess


Jacques Kistler

Switzerland is contemplating a comprehensive corporate tax reform – Swiss Corporate Tax Reform III – which would phase out certain tax regimes, such as the holding, mixed and domiciliary company regimes in the 2018 – 2020 timeframe and replace these regimes with a variety of other measures. The overriding objective of this comprehensive tax reform is to secure and strengthen the tax competitiveness and attractiveness of Switzerland as an international location for corporations.

Several measures to replace the holding, mixed and domiciliary company regimes that would accomplish the dual goals of tax competitiveness and international acceptance are being considered, in particular:

  • A licence box for income arising from the exploitation and use of intellectual property;

  • A notional interest deduction on equity; and

  • A general reduction of the headline corporate tax rate (effective combined federal/cantonal/communal rate).

Twelve Swiss cantons are now considering a reduction of their headline tax rate (effective combined federal/cantonal/communal rate). The following cantons already announced a reduction of their headline corporate tax rates: Vaud to 13.8%, Geneva to 13%, Neuchâtel to 15.6%, Fribourg to 15%, and Zug to approximately 12%.

In addition, the following cantons in Switzerland with a tax rate that already stands below 15% have stated they will, or are expected to, keep their low tax rates: Schwyz: 11.7 % (communities of Freienbach/Wollerau), Lucerne: 12.3% (11.3% in the lowest taxed community), Appenzell Ausserrhoden: 12.7%, Nidwalden: 12.7%, Obwalden: 12.7%, and Appenzell Innerrhoden: 14.3%.

As indicated above, the lowering of the headline tax rate is just one of several measures that are being contemplated to ensure the competitiveness and attractiveness of Switzerland for corporations once certain special tax regimes phase out in the 2018 to 2020 timeframe.

Jackie Hess (jahess@deloitte.ch)

Tel: +41 58 279 6312

Jacques Kistler (jkistler@deloitte.ch)

Tel: +41 58 279 8164

René Zulauf (rzulauf@deloitte.ch)

Tel: +41 58 279 6359

Deloitte

more across site & bottom lb ros

More from across our site

With the M&A market booming, ITR has partnered with correspondents from firms around the globe to provide a guide to the deal structures being employed and tax authorities' responses.
Xing Hu, partner at Hui Ye Law Firm in Shanghai, looks at the implications of the US Uyghur Forced Labor Protection Act for TP comparability analysis of China.
Karl Berlin talks to Josh White about meeting the Fair Tax standard, the changing burden of country-by-country reporting, and how windfall taxes may hit renewable energy.
Sandy Markwick, head of the Tax Director Network (TDN) at Winmark, looks at the challenges of global mobility for tax management.
Taxpayers should look beyond the headline criteria of the simplification regime to ensure that their arrangements meet the arm’s-length standard, say Alejandro Ces and Mark Seddon of the EY New Zealand transfer pricing team.
In a recent webinar hosted by law firms Greenberg Traurig and Clayton Utz, officials at the IRS and ATO outlined their visions for 2023.
The Asia-Pacific awards research cycle has now begun – don’t miss on this opportunity be recognised in 2023
An intense period of lobbying and persuasion is under way as the UN secretary-general’s report on the future of international tax cooperation begins to take shape. Ralph Cunningham reports.
Fresh details of the European Commission’s state aid case against Amazon emerge, while a pension fund is suing Amgen over its tax dispute with the Internal Revenue Service.
The OECD’s rules may be impossible for businesses to manage, according to tax experts from companies including Shell.