Switzerland: Swiss cantons announce lower headline tax rates in anticipation of Swiss Corporate Tax Reform III

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Switzerland: Swiss cantons announce lower headline tax rates in anticipation of Swiss Corporate Tax Reform III

hess.jpg

kistler.jpg

Jackie Hess


Jacques Kistler

Switzerland is contemplating a comprehensive corporate tax reform – Swiss Corporate Tax Reform III – which would phase out certain tax regimes, such as the holding, mixed and domiciliary company regimes in the 2018 – 2020 timeframe and replace these regimes with a variety of other measures. The overriding objective of this comprehensive tax reform is to secure and strengthen the tax competitiveness and attractiveness of Switzerland as an international location for corporations.

Several measures to replace the holding, mixed and domiciliary company regimes that would accomplish the dual goals of tax competitiveness and international acceptance are being considered, in particular:

  • A licence box for income arising from the exploitation and use of intellectual property;

  • A notional interest deduction on equity; and

  • A general reduction of the headline corporate tax rate (effective combined federal/cantonal/communal rate).

Twelve Swiss cantons are now considering a reduction of their headline tax rate (effective combined federal/cantonal/communal rate). The following cantons already announced a reduction of their headline corporate tax rates: Vaud to 13.8%, Geneva to 13%, Neuchâtel to 15.6%, Fribourg to 15%, and Zug to approximately 12%.

In addition, the following cantons in Switzerland with a tax rate that already stands below 15% have stated they will, or are expected to, keep their low tax rates: Schwyz: 11.7 % (communities of Freienbach/Wollerau), Lucerne: 12.3% (11.3% in the lowest taxed community), Appenzell Ausserrhoden: 12.7%, Nidwalden: 12.7%, Obwalden: 12.7%, and Appenzell Innerrhoden: 14.3%.

As indicated above, the lowering of the headline tax rate is just one of several measures that are being contemplated to ensure the competitiveness and attractiveness of Switzerland for corporations once certain special tax regimes phase out in the 2018 to 2020 timeframe.

Jackie Hess (jahess@deloitte.ch)

Tel: +41 58 279 6312

Jacques Kistler (jkistler@deloitte.ch)

Tel: +41 58 279 8164

René Zulauf (rzulauf@deloitte.ch)

Tel: +41 58 279 6359

Deloitte

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

ITR understands that UK Chancellor Rachel Reeves will announce a consultation on the proposed financial reward scheme, which had left advisers fretting
The long-running dispute centres on Medtronic’s use of the comparable uncontrolled transaction TP method; in other news, Paul Hastings and FTI Consulting both made double tax hires
The boutique Australian firm’s TP award recognition proves that world-class advisory services aren’t limited to the ‘big four’, the firm’s founder tells ITR
Canadian and Indian dual VAT models have been a source of inspiration for the Brazilian model, but the latter has unique and innovative features, the OECD paper claimed
More sophisticated use of technology, heightened TP scrutiny and stricter filing requirements are making South African Revenue Service audits a formidable challenge
The hire of Doug Wick expands Baker McKenzie’s state and local tax practice and adds to the firm’s growing ex-IRS expertise
One year after Nuwaru joined the WTS network, leaders James Jobson and Matthew Missaghi reflect on the firm’s mission to offer mid-tier pricing but deliver top-tier results
Join ITR's Head of Research, John Harrison, for an overview of key dates, new developments, best practices, and more for next year’s research cycle
The president’s tariff regime has already caused misery for taxpayers. Losing at the Supreme Court would mean it was all for nothing
The US itself was the biggest loser of tax revenue to American multinationals’ profit shifting, the Tax Justice Network reported; in other news, firms made key tax hires
Gift this article