Norway: Ministry of Finance issues exceptions to interest deduction limitation rules

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Norway: Ministry of Finance issues exceptions to interest deduction limitation rules

li.jpg

saastad.jpg

Wensing Li


Rolf Saastad

Norway's Ministry of Finance issued regulations on April 24 2014 that set out certain exceptions to the application of the interest deduction limitation rules that were adopted in 2013. The new regulations apply as from January 1 2014, that is, for the same period as the interest deduction limitation rules in general. The general rules primarily limit the deduction of interest expense on related party debt, but also will capture interest on third-party debt if a related party provided security for the debt.

The newly-issued regulations exempt the following securities provided by related parties:

  • Security provided by a company or entity that is at least 50% owned or controlled directly or indirectly by the borrower; and

  • Security in the form of a pledge of shares or loan notes issued by the borrower.

If the loan falls within one of these exceptions, interest expense on the external loan will be fully deductible for the borrower, regardless of the security granted by the related party.

The main features of the interest deduction limitation rules are as follows:

  • Interest deductibility on related party debt is non-deductible in a year to the extent the net interest expense exceeds 30% of tax EBITDA (earnings before interest, tax depreciation and amortisation), subject to certain adjustments.

  • The term related party for the purposes of the rules means direct or indirect ownership or control of at least 50% of a debtor. Related parties may be resident in Norway or abroad.

  • The limitation rules apply once the net interest expense exceeds a threshold of NOK 5 million ($850,000).

  • The limitation is calculated on an entity-by-entity basis, so a consolidated group approach is not available.

  • Net interest expense in excess of the limitation may be carried forward for 10 years, provided the expense falls within the 30% limitation for the relevant years.

  • External loans that are guaranteed by a related party will be considered internal debt and, therefore, will fall within the scope of the rules, except:

  • Security provided by a company or entity that is at least 50% owned or controlled directly or indirectly by the borrower; and

  • Security in the form of a pledge of shares or loan notes issued by the borrower.

  • Tax losses carried forward and group contributions are not deductible if the tax base before the limitation for deducting the net interest expense is negative or zero. If an interest deduction is disallowed, the taxpayer could have a positive tax base and tax payable even though it has tax losses carried forward.

  • Even if the deduction of interest is limited at the level of a borrower, the interest is taxable for the related party lender.

Wensing Li (wensli@deloitte.no) and Rolf Saastad (rsaastad@deloitte.no), Oslo

Deloitte

Tel: +47 23 27 98 36

Website: www.deloitteadvokatfirma.no

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

The threat of 50% tariffs on Brazilian goods coincides with new Brazilian legal powers to adopt retaliatory economic measures, local experts tell ITR
The country’s chancellor appears to have backtracked from previous pillar two scepticism; in other news, Donald Trump threatened Russia with 100% tariffs
In its latest G20 update, the OECD also revealed tense discussions with the US where the ‘significant threat’ of Section 899 was highlighted
The tax agency has increased compliance yield from wealthy individuals but cannot identify how much tax is paid by UK billionaires, the committee also claimed
Saffery cautioned that documentation requirements in new government proposals must be limited if medium-sized companies are not exempted from TP
The global minimum tax deal is not viable without US participation, Friedrich Merz has argued
Section 899 of the ‘one big beautiful’ bill would have spelled disaster for many international investors into the US, but following its shelving, attention turns to the fate of the OECD’s pillars
DLA Piper’s co-head of tax for the US and Latin America tells ITR about her fervent belief in equal access to the law, loving yoga, and paternal inspirations
Tax expert Craig Hillier agrees with the comparison of pillar two to using a sledgehammer to crack a nut
The amount is reported to be up 57% from the £5.6bn that the UK tax agency believes was underpaid in the previous year
Gift this article