Norway: Ministry of Finance issues exceptions to interest deduction limitation rules

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Norway: Ministry of Finance issues exceptions to interest deduction limitation rules

li.jpg

saastad.jpg

Wensing Li


Rolf Saastad

Norway's Ministry of Finance issued regulations on April 24 2014 that set out certain exceptions to the application of the interest deduction limitation rules that were adopted in 2013. The new regulations apply as from January 1 2014, that is, for the same period as the interest deduction limitation rules in general. The general rules primarily limit the deduction of interest expense on related party debt, but also will capture interest on third-party debt if a related party provided security for the debt.

The newly-issued regulations exempt the following securities provided by related parties:

  • Security provided by a company or entity that is at least 50% owned or controlled directly or indirectly by the borrower; and

  • Security in the form of a pledge of shares or loan notes issued by the borrower.

If the loan falls within one of these exceptions, interest expense on the external loan will be fully deductible for the borrower, regardless of the security granted by the related party.

The main features of the interest deduction limitation rules are as follows:

  • Interest deductibility on related party debt is non-deductible in a year to the extent the net interest expense exceeds 30% of tax EBITDA (earnings before interest, tax depreciation and amortisation), subject to certain adjustments.

  • The term related party for the purposes of the rules means direct or indirect ownership or control of at least 50% of a debtor. Related parties may be resident in Norway or abroad.

  • The limitation rules apply once the net interest expense exceeds a threshold of NOK 5 million ($850,000).

  • The limitation is calculated on an entity-by-entity basis, so a consolidated group approach is not available.

  • Net interest expense in excess of the limitation may be carried forward for 10 years, provided the expense falls within the 30% limitation for the relevant years.

  • External loans that are guaranteed by a related party will be considered internal debt and, therefore, will fall within the scope of the rules, except:

  • Security provided by a company or entity that is at least 50% owned or controlled directly or indirectly by the borrower; and

  • Security in the form of a pledge of shares or loan notes issued by the borrower.

  • Tax losses carried forward and group contributions are not deductible if the tax base before the limitation for deducting the net interest expense is negative or zero. If an interest deduction is disallowed, the taxpayer could have a positive tax base and tax payable even though it has tax losses carried forward.

  • Even if the deduction of interest is limited at the level of a borrower, the interest is taxable for the related party lender.

Wensing Li (wensli@deloitte.no) and Rolf Saastad (rsaastad@deloitte.no), Oslo

Deloitte

Tel: +47 23 27 98 36

Website: www.deloitteadvokatfirma.no

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

The levies extended beyond the president’s ‘legitimate reach’, the Supreme Court ruled
While Brazil’s consumption tax overhaul led to a short-term spike in tax advisory demand, we are now in a period of ‘normalisation’ marked by decreased recruitment
The expanded firm will comprise roughly 8,500 employees, including 550 partners; in other news, Paul Hastings and Macfarlanes made senior tax hires
Meanwhile, one expert highlights the importance of separating Venezuela’s tax authority from direct political control after ‘lost decades and isolation’
With PMK 108, Indonesia has upgraded its tax transparency regime for the digital era, focusing on data quality, governance, and cross border exchange rather than expanding regulatory reach
In a popular LinkedIn post, Jeremie Beitel encouraged firms to invest in junior talent even if it doesn’t lead to their loyalty, though recruiters offered ITR a mixed assessment
Advisers who do not register for the new regime in time could be prevented from interacting with HMRC, the tax authority said
Valid pillar two objectives are still intact after the side-by-side agreement, but whether the framework is now settled is ‘a $64,000 question’, Morrison Foerster’s tax chair told ITR
Ian Halligan previously led Baker Tilly’s international tax services in the US
Exclusive ITR data emphasises that DEI does not affect in-house buying decisions – and it’s nothing to do with the US president
Gift this article