Poland: Introducing one of most unorthodox CFC systems in the world? No local capital gains participation exemption

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Poland: Introducing one of most unorthodox CFC systems in the world? No local capital gains participation exemption

glowacki.jpg

Bartosz Glowacki

Poland wants to introduce controlled foreign corporation (CFC) rules, which may start to apply even already to 2015 profits. The Polish government has cherry-picked from CFC mechanisms around the world, but somehow only the most oppressive ideas were copied. Any company seated in a territory formally blacklisted as a tax haven by Polish Ministry of Finance (or a territory with which there is no exchange of information agreement) will be treated as a CFC. No exemptions are provided. Another CFC category, which includes even companies seated within the EU and tax treaty countries, are non-Polish companies, in which the Polish tax resident (corporate or individual) owns for an uninterrupted period of 30 days per year, directly or indirectly 25% of share capital, voting rights or share in profits, when at least 50% of that company's income is passive and taxed at a rate lower than 14.25%.

The overseas company from a treaty country which is not blacklisted will not be recognised as a CFC if it runs real business. There is no definition of "real business", but some guidance is provided by the law.

Polish taxpayers will have to keep a special register of all CFCs owned directly or indirectly and to record all events in each CFC to make it possible to calculate the income of the CFC and the tax due in Poland. And all calculations must be based on Polish rules, which in fact means double accounting for CFC, one local where the CFC is registered and the second for Polish purposes.

CFC characterisation will not apply to companies with revenue below €250.000 per year. Foreign branches may be treated as CFC. Poland will still be one of the very few worldwide exceptions among modern tax systems, as Poland does not provide for any participation exemption for capital gains. There is no Polish holding company system and for the time being the government has no intention to make it. So with CFC and no holding company regime, Poland may become the most tax unfriendly country for international expansion.

However, Poland still offers very interesting exemptions, binding till 2016, for businesses investing in Special Economic Zones.

These are the main characteristics of the Polish CFC system, but it is still the draft.

Bartosz Glowacki (bartosz.glowacki@mddp.pl)

MDDP

Tel: +48 22 322 68 88

Website: www.mddp.pl

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

New research, which suggests LLMs can silently corrupt complex documents, should alert tax and legal teams relying on AI to handle iterative drafting and compliance workflows
Maintaining increased funding for HMRC is a ‘high possibility’ if he becomes PM, ITR has also heard
Awards
ITR is delighted to reveal all the shortlisted nominees for the 2026 Europe Tax Awards
The firm has hired a team of private client lawyers from Withers to launch in New York and Connecticut, though ITR analysis suggests it faces stiff competition
The ability of tax authorities to receive and analyse data is becoming ‘quite advanced’, warns Stuart Lang, head of EY’s compliance co-sourcing solution
The Court of Appeal ruling clarifies that treaty benefits are not abusive where transactions are commercially driven, providing greater certainty on “main purpose” anti-avoidance tests
Despite the Netherlands featuring an unusual concentration of World Tax-ranked technology-led providers, sources believe there’s a long way to go to challenge the established players
Ethics seems to be playing a subservient role to an entitlement culture borne out of a pervasive ‘revenue at all costs’ mentality at the big four
Historical World Tax data suggests the ‘largest law firm merger in history’ may not pose a serious threat to the world's leading tax practices
The repeal of Libya’s statute of limitations and tougher enforcement leave taxpayers navigating a high-stakes choice between conciliation and litigation
Gift this article