Switzerland: Swiss views on BEPS

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Switzerland: Swiss views on BEPS

habermacher.jpg

reese.jpg

Hans Rudolf Habermacher


Markus Reese

The BEPS initiative attracts the attention of Swiss tax executives. The main reason is the uncertainty around the final outcome of BEPS and its impact on the international tax environment. Other reasons are the tight timeline for the implementation of BEPS and the immediate need for actions to mitigate tax risk exposure through an alignment of tax and operational models. From a Swiss tax perspective the complexity of the planned changes under BEPS is even greater since the Swiss government is currently working on the so-called Corporate Tax Reform III (CTR III) which aims to secure and strengthen the tax competitiveness and attractiveness of Switzerland as an international location for corporations. CTR III will replace current tax privileges, such as holding, mixed and domiciliary company tax regimes in the coming years with other measures, such as a License Box regime and the introduction of a notional interest deduction, in addition to a broad based reduction of headline cantonal tax rates, which is currently being discussed.

Measures proposed as part of the BEPS initiative obviously need to be taken into consideration when drafting the CTR III. It is the ambition to align the Swiss tax law with the internationally acknowledged OECD principles, especially from a transfer pricing point of view. It will make it easier for taxpayers in the future to defend the transfer prices applied between foreign and Swiss group entities if the business models are carefully aligned to the parameters of BEPS and CTR III. For multinational corporations which can demonstrate sufficient economic substance in Switzerland in particular, Switzerland will remain a preferred location for headquarter, principal, IP and financing structures.

Since the BEPS initiative by the G20 and OECD is still ongoing, the anticipated changes under CTR III are still to be determined. We will be closely monitoring the developments and shall keep you updated.

Hans Rudolf Habermacher (hhabermacher@deloitte.ch)

Tel: +41 58 279 6327
Markus Reese (mreese@deloitte.ch)

Tel: +41 58 279 6306

Deloitte

Website: www.deloitte.ch

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

Brazil’s shift to a nationwide consumption tax is more than conceptual; it fundamentally transforms municipal revenue, enforcement, and administrative disputes
While some advisers praised the ruling’s definition of a ‘voucher’ for VAT purposes, a UK partner said the case left unanswered questions
While pillar two has been enacted on paper in Brazil, companies are encountering a range of practical compliance issues, ITR has heard
Moore, founding partner of the Chicago tax boutique which bears her name, shares her career wisdom for ITR’s new Women in Tax interview series
But partners at the firm admit that jumping ship to the US would not be as easy as some believe
Governments are rewriting tax policy for the AI era, deploying digital taxes, tailored incentives and algorithmic enforcement that redefine where value is created
Wingrove will succeed Bill Thomas, who has served in the role since 2017; in other news, Andersen unveiled a sharp increase in revenues for 2025
Partners are divided on Italy vs PDM D’s analytical depth, evidentiary standards, and what the judgment signals for future intra-group financing cases
As GCCs increasingly become strategic hubs, multinationals face heightened risks around permanent establishment and place of effective management
While all options presented ‘drawbacks’, European Commission tax leader Wopke Hoekstra said the controversial US carve-out deal has ‘many benefits’
Gift this article