All material subject to strictly enforced copyright laws. © 2022 ITR is part of the Euromoney Institutional Investor PLC group.

US Inbound: IRS international practice units



Jim Fuller

David Forst

As a part of the IRS Large Business & International Division's knowledge management efforts, international practice units have been developed through internal collaboration and serve as both aids and training materials on international tax issues. They are not official pronouncements of law, and cannot be used, cited or relied upon as such. The IRS issued two new inbound international practice units in July 2015: non-services FDAP [fixed or determinable, annual or periodical] income; and branch-level interest tax concepts. The practice unit dealing with branch-level interest tax concepts provides a pretty good analysis of the rules under § 884(f). A branch-level interest tax is composed of two parts: a withholding tax imposed on interest paid by a US branch to a foreign person (referred to as branch interest) and a tax imposed on the excess of the foreign corporation's interest allocable to income connected to effectively connected income over its branch interest (referred to as excess interest). This practice unit would provide a good review for someone interested in understanding § 884(f).

The non-services FDAP income practice unit focuses on royalty income as an example. The IRS examiner is directed to determine whether the foreign corporation licensor (FC) has an office in the US through which it licenses software to other customers. The IRS examiner is directed to determine whether FC has employees in the US who provide aftermarket technical services related to the software. These are important facts in analysing whether the royalty income would be treated as effectively connected with a US trade or business. The IRS examiner is also told to confirm that the software is licensed and not sold (sale of copyrighted articles). The practice unit provides a reasonably thorough approach to auditing these transactions.

The practice units make references to IPNs (international practice networks). These are IRS employee groups that network in designated areas to broaden, enhance, and share their experiences. They are, more or less, groups of experts on designated issues.

The non-services FDAP income practice unit states that the examiner should consult with the Repatriation/Withholding IPN to determine when the taxpayer's activities create effectively connected income. It also states that the examiner, on a different point, should consult with IRS counsel and the Jurisdiction-to-tax IPN for guidance. The branch-level practice unit refers the examiner to the Treaties IPN for assistance in determining general treaty eligibility including the qualifications under a limitation on benefits article.

Jim Fuller ( and David Forst (

Fenwick & West

Tel: +1 650 335 7205; +1 650 335 7274


more across site & bottom lb ros

More from across our site

The European Parliament raises concerns over unanimity in voting on pillar two, while protests break out over tax reform in Colombia.
Ramesh Khaitan speaks to reporter Siqalane Taho about tax morality, transfer pricing regulations, Indian tax developments, and the OECD’s two-pillar solution.
Join ITR and KPMG China at 10am BST on October 19 as they discuss the personal, employment, and corporate tax-related implications of employees working from overseas.
Tricentis and Boehringer Ingelheim, along with a European Commission TP specialist, criticised the complexity of pillar one rules and their scope at an ITR event.
Speakers at ITR’s Managing Tax Disputes Summit said taxpayers can still face lengthy TP audits, despite strong documentation preparation
Gig economy companies in New Zealand will need to fully account and become liable for the goods and services tax of underlying suppliers on their platforms, under new proposals.
Join ITR and Thomson Reuters at 2pm (UAE) / 11am (UK) on October 13 as they discuss how businesses can prepare for Tax Administration 3.0 and future-proof against changes such as e-invoicing and increasing digitisation.
ITR has partnered with global TP leaders from Deloitte to discuss transfer pricing controversy around the globe, and to share advice on how to navigate an increasingly uncertain and risky TP landscape.
Sources say they are not satisfied with pillar one protections in the marketing and distribution safe harbour, even though it was designed to give businesses greater tax certainty.
Political support for qualified majority voting is at a peak as unanimity rules continue to block the European Council from passing a directive on pillar two.
We use cookies to provide a personalized site experience.
By continuing to use & browse the site you agree to our Privacy Policy.
I agree