Germany: Retroactive changes to RETT rules to apply from 2009
International Tax Review is part of the Delinian Group, Delinian Limited, 4 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX, Registered in England & Wales, Company number 00954730
Copyright © Delinian Limited and its affiliated companies 2024

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Germany: Retroactive changes to RETT rules to apply from 2009



Alexander Linn

Thorsten Braun

On July 17 2015, Germany's Constitutional Court made public a decision, dated June 23, in which the court held that the 'secondary tax base' or 'special tax value' used in the calculation of the value of real property for German real estate transfer tax (RETT) purposes is unconstitutional. The secondary tax base is used as an alternative method of calculating the value of real property in cases where real property is not purchased directly, such as the direct or indirect transfer of shares in real estate holding entities, mergers, and so on. The secondary tax base generally results in values that are far lower than the fair market value of the real property, in many cases only reflecting 50% or less of the fair value of the property. The secondary tax base is calculated based on the actual annual rent or an alternative customary rent combined with certain multipliers and adjustments or, if rent is not available, on tax book values for land and buildings with relevant adjustments.

The court held that the calculation of RETT based on the secondary tax base violates the equality principle in article 3 of the German constitution because it deviates significantly and unintentionally from the market value of the real property. The court decided that the current version of the law cannot apply as from January 1 2009, and that parliament has until June 30 2016 to enact a new law that applies retroactively from January 1 2009.

The change in the law is expected to result in an increased RETT base closer to the fair market value used in direct purchases and, therefore, to an increased RETT in future transactions. Further, due to the retroactive effect of the decision, the new law could apply in cases where the RETT-triggering event already has occurred but the RETT base has not been finally assessed or where the RETT- triggering event has not been indicated or detected.

Alexander Linn ( and Thorsten Braun (


Tel: +49 89 29036 8558 and +49 69 75695 6444

more across site & bottom lb ros

More from across our site

The reported warning follows EY accumulating extra debt to deal with the costs of its failed Project Everest
Law firms that pay close attention to their client relationships are more likely to win repeat work, according to a survey of nearly 29,000 in-house counsel
Paul Griggs, the firm’s inbound US senior partner, will reverse a move by the incumbent leader; in other news, RSM has announced its new CEO
The EMEA research period is open until May 31
Luis Coronado suggests companies should embrace technology to assist with TP data reporting, as the ‘big four’ firm unveils a TP survey of over 1,000 professionals
The proposed matrix will help revenue officers track intra-company transactions from multinationals
The full list of finalists has been revealed and the winners will be presented on June 20 at the Metropolitan Club in New York
The ‘big four’ firm has threatened to legally pursue those behind the letter, which has been circulating on social media
The guidelines have been established in the wake of multiple tax scandals and controversies that have rocked the accounting profession
KPMG Netherlands’ former head of assurance also received a permanent bar and $150,000 fine; in other news, asset management firm BlackRock lost a $13.5bn UK tax appeal
Gift this article