International Tax Review is part of the Delinian Group, Delinian Limited, 8 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX, Registered in England & Wales, Company number 00954730
Copyright © Delinian Limited and its affiliated companies 2023

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Germany: Retroactive changes to RETT rules to apply from 2009

linn.jpg

braun.jpg

Alexander Linn


Thorsten Braun

On July 17 2015, Germany's Constitutional Court made public a decision, dated June 23, in which the court held that the 'secondary tax base' or 'special tax value' used in the calculation of the value of real property for German real estate transfer tax (RETT) purposes is unconstitutional. The secondary tax base is used as an alternative method of calculating the value of real property in cases where real property is not purchased directly, such as the direct or indirect transfer of shares in real estate holding entities, mergers, and so on. The secondary tax base generally results in values that are far lower than the fair market value of the real property, in many cases only reflecting 50% or less of the fair value of the property. The secondary tax base is calculated based on the actual annual rent or an alternative customary rent combined with certain multipliers and adjustments or, if rent is not available, on tax book values for land and buildings with relevant adjustments.

The court held that the calculation of RETT based on the secondary tax base violates the equality principle in article 3 of the German constitution because it deviates significantly and unintentionally from the market value of the real property. The court decided that the current version of the law cannot apply as from January 1 2009, and that parliament has until June 30 2016 to enact a new law that applies retroactively from January 1 2009.

The change in the law is expected to result in an increased RETT base closer to the fair market value used in direct purchases and, therefore, to an increased RETT in future transactions. Further, due to the retroactive effect of the decision, the new law could apply in cases where the RETT-triggering event already has occurred but the RETT base has not been finally assessed or where the RETT- triggering event has not been indicated or detected.

Alexander Linn (allinn@deloitte.de) and Thorsten Braun (tbraun@deloitte.de)

Deloitte

Tel: +49 89 29036 8558 and +49 69 75695 6444

more across site & bottom lb ros

More from across our site

Lawmakers have up to 120 days to decide the future of Brazil’s unique transfer pricing rules, but many taxpayers are wary of radical change.
Shell reports profits of £32.2 billion, prompting calls for higher taxes on energy companies, while the IMF has warned Australia to raise taxes to sustain public spending.
Governments now have the final OECD guidance on how to implement the 15% global minimum corporate tax rate.
The Indian company, which is contesting the bill, has a family connection to UK Prime Minister Rishi Sunak – whose government has just been hit by a tax scandal.
Developments included calls for tax reform in Malaysia and the US, concerns about the level of the VAT threshold in the UK, Ukraine’s preparations for EU accession, and more.
A steady stream of countries has announced steps towards implementing pillar two, but Korea has got there first. Ralph Cunningham finds out what tax executives should do next.
The BEPS Monitoring Group has found a rare point of agreement with business bodies advocating an EU-wide one-stop-shop for compliance under BEFIT.
Former PwC partner Peter-John Collins has been banned from serving as a tax agent in Australia, while Brazil reports its best-ever year of tax collection on record.
Industry groups are concerned about the shift away from the ALP towards formulary apportionment as part of a common consolidated corporate tax base across the EU.
The former tax official in Italy will take up her post in April.