All material subject to strictly enforced copyright laws. © 2022 ITR is part of the Euromoney Institutional Investor PLC group.

India: Exclusion of overseas dividend from indirect transfer provisions



Rajendra Nayak

Aastha Jain

Under the Indian Tax Law (ITL), income arising from any asset in India or from transfer of a capital asset situated in India would be taxable in India. In 2012, the ITL was retroactively amended to introduce provisions for the taxation of indirect transfer (IDT provisions) under which it was clarified that an asset or a capital asset being any share in a foreign company shall be deemed to be situated in India, if such shares derive their value substantially from the assets located in India. Accordingly, transfer of such deemed asset was taxable in India. The legislative intent of such provision was to tax gains having an economic nexus with India, irrespective of the mode of realisation of such gains. Apprehensions were raised by various stakeholders on the overreaching scope of deeming fiction under the IDT provisions, which deems the shares of a foreign company to be situated in India. Concern was raised that the provisions would result in taxation in India of dividend income declared by such foreign company outside India. This was perceived as an unintended consequence of the IDT provisions.

The Central Board of Direct Taxes (CBDT), the apex administrative body for taxation in India, recently issued a circular (Circular 4 of 2015) to clarify that:

  • the IDT provisions would trigger tax for the transaction which has the effect of transferring, directly or indirectly, the underlying assets located in India, as income accruing or arising in India; and

  • declaration of dividend by a foreign company outside India does not have an effect of transfer of any underlying asset located in India. Accordingly, such dividend paid by foreign company would not be taxable in India by virtue of the IDT provisions of the ITL.

This clarification from the CBDT addresses the concern which had arisen on account of the wide scope of the IDT provisions. This is also in line with the intent of the present Indian Government to provide certainty and stability in India's tax regime.

Rajendra Nayak ( and Aastha Jain (

Ernst & Young

Tel: +91 80 6727 5275


more across site & bottom lb ros

More from across our site

The UN’s decision to seek a leadership role in global tax policy could be a crucial turning point but won’t be the end of the OECD, say tax experts.
The UN may be set to assume a global role in tax policy that would rival the OECD, while automakers lobby the US to change its tax rules on Chinese materials.
Companies including Valentino and EveryMatrix say the early adoption of EU public CbCR rules could boost transparency of local and foreign MNEs, despite the short notice.
ITR invites tax firms, in-house teams, and tax professionals to make submissions for the 2023 ITR Tax Awards in Asia-Pacific, Europe Middle East & Africa, and the Americas.
Tax authorities and customs are failing multinationals by creating uncertainty with contradictory assessment and guidance, say in-house tax directors.
The CJEU said the General Court erred in law when it ruled that both companies benefitted from Italian state aid.
An OECD report reveals multinationals have continued to shift profits to low-tax jurisdictions, reinforcing the case for strong multilateral action in response.
The UK government announced plans to increase taxes on oil and gas profits, while the Irish government considers its next move on tax reform.
War and COVID have highlighted companies’ unpreparedness to deal with sudden geo-political changes, say TP specialists.
A source who has seen the draft law said it brings clarity on intangibles and other areas of TP including tax planning.