All material subject to strictly enforced copyright laws. © 2022 ITR is part of the Euromoney Institutional Investor PLC group.

Germany: German Federal Tax Court rules disallowance of write-down for related-party debt violates OECD model treaty

Linn-Alexander-100
Braun-Thorsten-100

Alexander Linn

Thorsten Braun

The German Federal Tax Court (Bundesfinanzhof, BFH) issued a decision (case ref. I R 29/14) on September 9 2015, in which it held that the domestic transfer pricing rules may not be applied to disallow a write-down of an impaired related-party debt in a case where a relevant tax treaty includes the arm's-length standard provisions of Article 9 of the OECD model treaty.

Until 2007, German multinationals could claim a deduction for bad debts on loans granted to subsidiaries if the subsidiary did not perform as planned and the debt was impaired. As from 2008, write-downs of related-party loans are non-deductible under specific rules in the German Corporate Tax Act, unless it can be demonstrated that the loan was granted in line with (a very narrow interpretation of) the arm's-length principle.

In an effort to extend the general presumption of non-deductibility to the years before 2008, the German tax authorities challenged a 2002 write-down of a substantial unsecured debt owed by an undercapitalised UK subsidiary of a German entity of a Canadian group. The tax authorities argued that the German transfer pricing rules disallowed the write-down because either the loan was not granted on arm's-length terms, or the loan was not impaired because the subsidiary still could rely on the financial backing from its group, as long as it paid its third-party lenders.

The BFH confirmed a previous decision (case ref. I R 23/13) and emphasised that it may be in line with the arm's-length principle not to require collateral from a group subsidiary when granting a loan, and that it still may be possible to consider such a debt to be impaired if the subsidiary experiences financial difficulties. The BFH also confirmed that, where a tax treaty includes Article 9, paragraph 1 of the OECD model (as is the case with most German tax treaties), the domestic transfer pricing provisions may not disallow the write-down, since Article 9 permits only income adjustments relating to the conditions of the loan (for example, the interest rate); it does not permit the disallowance of a write-down. It is unclear if the same reasoning may be applied to years from 2008, where the deduction for a write-down is generally disallowed for reasons unrelated to the transfer pricing framework.

Alexander Linn (allinn@deloitte.de) and Thorsten Braun (tbraun@deloitte.de)

Deloitte

Tel: +49 89 29036 8558 and +49 69 75695 6444

Website: www.deloitte.de

More from across our site

The state secretary told the French press that the country continues to oppose pillar two’s global minimum tax rate following an Ecofin meeting last week.
This week the Biden administration has run into opposition over a proposal for a federal gas tax holiday, while the European Parliament has approved a plan for an EU carbon border mechanism.
Businesses need to improve on data management to ensure tax departments become much more integrated, according to Microsoft’s chief digital officer at a KPMG event.
Businesses must ensure any alternative benchmark rate is included in their TP studies and approved by tax authorities, as Libor for the US ends in exactly a year.
Tax directors warn that a lack of adequate planning for VAT rule changes could leave businesses exposed to regulatory errors and costly fines.
Tax professionals have urged suppliers of goods from Great Britain to Northern Ireland to pause any plans to restructure their supply chains following the NI Protocol Bill.
Tax leaders say communication with peers is important for risk management, especially on how to approach regional authorities.
Advances in compliance tools in international markets and the digitalisation of global tax administrations are increasing in-house demand for technologists.
The US fast-food company has agreed to pay €1.25 billion to settle the French investigation into its transfer pricing arrangements over allegations of tax evasion.
HM Revenue and Customs said the UK pillar two legislation will be delayed until at least December 2023, while ITR reported on a secret Netflix settlement and an IMF study on VAT cuts.
We use cookies to provide a personalized site experience.
By continuing to use & browse the site you agree to our Privacy Policy.
I agree