Middle East: The impact of FATCA on financial institutions in the GCC

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 4 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Middle East: The impact of FATCA on financial institutions in the GCC

AdobeStock_178203234_impact

With the US Foreign Account Tax Compliance Act (FATCA) reporting deadlines approaching, foreign financial institutions (FFIs) should ensure they understand the impact of FATCA in their organisation and the compliance requirements they are subject to under the intergovernmental agreement (IGA), signed or agreed in substance, between the US and several countries in the GCC including: the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia (KSA), United Arab Emirates, Kuwait, Qatar, and Bahrain.

dawson.jpg

torres.jpg

Claire Dawson


Diana Torres

FATCA is a US regulatory requirement that seeks to prevent US taxpayers who hold financial assets in non-US financial institutions (foreign financial institutions or FFIs) and other offshore vehicles from avoiding their US tax obligations. The intention is for FFIs to identify and report to the IRS, any US persons holding assets abroad and for certain non-financial foreign entities (NFFEs) to identify their substantial US owners.

Failure to enter into an agreement or provide required documentation may result in the imposition of a 30% withholding tax on certain payments made to such customers and counterparties.

As the aforementioned countries have agreed in substance, or signed, a Model 1 IGA with the US Government, every entity that meets the FATCA FFI definition, not otherwise exempt under the IGA, will have to comply with the requirements established by the IGA including:

  • Register with the IRS and obtain a Global Intermediary Identification Number (GIIN);

  • Classify their financial accounts for FATCA purposes; and

  • Report US accounts identified (US accounts are financial accounts held by US taxpayers, or held by foreign entities in which US taxpayers hold a substantial ownership interest)

Financial institutions in these jurisdictions must make sure they meet the reporting deadline set out by the local regulator. Participating FFIs will be required to file information with respect to the 2014 calendar year (that is, for individual financial accounts on boarded after July 1 2014) before September 30 2015 (please note that this is the deadline for the local regulator to report to the IRS; the FFI's deadline is likely to be earlier and will be announced by the local regulator in due course).

The main challenge faced by FFIs in these jurisdictions has been the limited guidance provided by local regulators, particularly with respect to reporting; in certain instances no dates have been provided, nor a portal made available to the FFIs. Some regulators have indicated that a portal will only be made available once the IGA has been signed, which could potentially give FFIs limited time to report. FFIs should ensure they have the reporting data available in extractable format so they are able to meet the reporting deadline once it is announced.

Financial institutions should also be looking to future reporting requirements, namely the OECD's Common Reporting Standard (CRS). The CRS requires the reporting of assets held in one country by residents, nationals or taxpayers of another jurisdiction. More than 90 different countries have now committed to comply with this standard, including KSA, Qatar and the UAE with effect from 2018.

Claire Dawson (cdawson@deloitte.com) and Diana Torres (ditorres@deloitte.com)

Deloitte

Tel: +971 (0) 4506 4900 and +971 (0) 4506 4893

Website: www.deloitte.com/middleeast

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

Brazil appears to be adopting protocols to align national taxation with international standards, but recent changes are not immune from criticism, experts tell ITR
The US president did not have the authority to impose the tariffs, a court ruled; in other news, Fried Frank and Crowe Ireland made key tax hires
Pillar two considerations have become a fact of life for taxpayers everywhere, not least in Switzerland, where companies nonetheless continue to be active with investment
The Dutch TP software company’s co-founder tells ITR about speeding up documentation processes, following in Steve Jobs’s footsteps, and what makes tax cool
The ruling underscores the need for companies to provide robust and defensible valuations of intangible assets, one partner tells ITR
Pillar two is certain to be a game-changer for tax advisers and their clients. Russell Gammon of Tax Systems outlines 10 reasons why
Despite a general decline in corporate tax rates around the world, jurisdictions are now more reliant on it than in 1990, a Tax Foundation economist found
Australian law firm Webb Henderson’s report said PwC had met 46 of 47 targets; in other news, the OECD has issued new transfer pricing country profiles
The arrival of a seven-strong team from Baker McKenzie will boost WTS Germany’s transfer pricing capabilities and help it become ‘a European champion’, the firm’s CEO said
Germany has forgotten to think about digital reporting requirements, a WTS partner claimed at ITR’s Indirect Tax Forum 2025
Gift this article