International Tax Review is part of the Delinian Group, Delinian Limited, 4 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX, Registered in England & Wales, Company number 00954730
Copyright © Delinian Limited and its affiliated companies 2023

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Hong Kong: Hong Kong moves towards a favourable Treasury regime



Ayesha Lau

Darren Bowdern

A corporate treasury company often borrows from group companies with surplus cash and on-lends to other group companies. Hong Kong's tax laws provide that interest paid by a treasury is generally not tax deductible when borrowed from an offshore group company notwithstanding that interest income from these activities is subject to tax in Hong Kong. Consequently, and directly due to the asymmetry of tax treatment, Hong Kong is seldom a preferred location for multinationals establishing regional corporate treasury companies. Hong Kong's financial secretary announced in his Budget speech in February 2015 that the government intends amending the taxation laws to allow for interest deductions for Corporate Treasury Centres (CTCs) as well as a tax rate cut of up to 50% for firms setting up CTCs in the territory.

The government is confident that these proposed incentives will enable Hong Kong to actively compete for firms looking to establish CTCs in the Asia Pacific region and will help Hong Kong cement its position as a prime financial hub.

The development of Hong Kong as a regional CTC hub would benefit Hong Kong's financial and business sectors, and help increase Hong Kong's capital markets, including the offshore RMB market. It is likely that the focus of the government's recent announcement is emerging Chinese and Asian multinationals.

Many multinational companies regard Singapore as having an advantage over Hong Kong as a regional treasury centre, mainly due to its favourable tax treatment of CTCs. Hong Kong can, however, claim many of the same advantages. In particular its network of double taxation treaties is generally considered to be modern, of good quality and is still expanding. Under the current proposal, the Hong Kong tax rate for qualifying treasury centre income (8.25%) will actually be lower than Singapore (10%) and with the intention of amending the interest deduction rules, a Hong Kong CTC would no longer be economically disadvantaged if it is funded by offshore entities within the same group.

The proposed legislation is not expected until the latter part of 2015, and a consultation period is likely to take place beforehand. Once the consultation period is announced, further details of what activities would constitute a CTC are likely to be published.

The relaxation of the interest deduction rules for qualifying CTC activities and a concessionary half-rate regime for qualifying CTCs will definitely enhance Hong Kong's future attractiveness.

Ayesha Lau ( and Darren Bowdern (


Tel: +852 2826 8028 and +852 2826 7166


more across site & bottom lb ros

More from across our site

The General Court reverses its position taken four years ago, while the UN discusses tax policy in New York.
Discussion on amount B under the first part of the OECD's two-pronged approach to international tax reform is far from over, if the latest consultation is anything go by.
Pillar two might be top of mind for many multinational companies, but the huge variations between countries’ readiness means getting ahead of the game now, argues Russell Gammon, chief solutions officer at Tax Systems.
ITR’s latest quarterly PDF is going live today, leading on the looming battle between the UN and the OECD for dominance in global tax policy.
Company tax changes are central to the German government’s plan to revive the economy, but sources say they miss the mark. Ralph Cunningham reports.
The winners of the ITR Americas Tax Awards have been announced for 2023!
There is a ‘huge demand’ for tax services in the Middle East, says new Clyde & Co partner Rachel Fox in an interview with ITR.
The ECB warns the tax could leave banks with weaker capital levels, while the UAE publishes guidance on its new corporate tax regime.
Caroline Setliffe and Ben Shem-Tov of Eversheds Sutherland give an overview of the US transfer pricing penalty regime and UK diverted profits tax considerations for multinational companies.
The result follows what EY said was one of the most successful years in the firm’s history.