Germany: Federal Tax Court rules CFC income is not subject to trade tax

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Germany: Federal Tax Court rules CFC income is not subject to trade tax

linn.jpg

braun.jpg

Alexander Linn


Thorsten Braun

Germany's Federal Tax Court (BFH) issued a decision (case reference I R 10/14) on March 11 2015 in which it held that controlled foreign company (CFC) income is not subject to German trade tax. The BFH concluded that CFC income constitutes deemed income of a foreign permanent establishment (PE) for German tax purposes and, thus, is deductible from the trade tax base. The BFH overturned a 2012 decision of the lower court of Düsseldorf (16 K 2513/12), putting to rest a long-standing controversy on this issue. Under Germany's CFC rules, CFC income arises if a foreign subsidiary that is controlled by German shareholders earns low-taxed passive income. Any income that is not included in an exhaustive list of active income would be deemed passive income (passive income would include, but is not limited to, interest and most types of royalty payments). The low-taxation threshold is set at 25% even though Germany reduced the corporate income tax rate from 25% to 15% in 2007. CFC income is taxed currently in the hands of the German shareholders as a deemed dividend, to which exemptions and other dividend relief mechanisms do not apply. Even though CFC income is included in the corporate tax income base and, thus, also in the starting point for the income calculated for trade tax purposes, any foreign tax paid by the CFC is creditable only against corporate income tax and not against trade tax, so the application of the CFC rules could lead to incongruous results. Referring to the territorial scope of German trade tax, the court held that CFC income can be seen as income deemed to arise in a foreign permanent establishment which has to be eliminated from the trade tax base.

As a consequence, CFC income attributed to German entities would only be taxed at a 15.825% rate (corporate income tax, including the solidarity surcharge). It remains to be seen if and how the legislator will react to this decision.

Alexander Linn (allinn@deloitte.de) and Thorsten Braun (tbraun@deloitte.de)

Deloitte

Tel: +49 89 29036 8558 and +49 69 75695 6444

Website: www.deloitte.de

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

Exclusive ITR data emphasises that DEI does not affect in-house buying decisions – and it’s nothing to do with the US president
The firms made senior hires in Los Angeles and Cleveland respectively; in other news, South Korea reported an 11% rise in tax income, fuelled by a corporation tax boom
The ‘deeply flawed’ report is attempting to derail UN tax convention debates, the Tax Justice Network’s CEO said
Salim Rahim, a TP specialist, had been a partner at Baker McKenzie since 2010
While the manual should be consulted for any questions around MAPs, the OECD’s Sriram Govind also emphasised that the guidance is ‘not a political commitment’
The landmark Indian Supreme Court judgment redefines GAAR, JAAR and treaty safeguards, rejects protections for indirect transfers and tightens conditions for Mauritius‑based investors claiming DTAA relief
The expansion introduces ‘business-level digital capabilities’ for tax professionals, the US tax agency said
As tax teams face pressure from complex rules and manual processes, adopting clear ownership, clean data and adaptable technology is essential, writes Russell Gammon, chief innovation officer at Tax Systems
Partners want to join Ryan because it’s a disruptor firm, truly global and less bureaucratic, Tom Shave told ITR
If Trump continues to poke the world’s ‘middle powers’ with a stick, he shouldn’t be surprised when they retaliate
Gift this article