Germany: Federal Tax Court rules CFC income is not subject to trade tax

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Germany: Federal Tax Court rules CFC income is not subject to trade tax

linn.jpg

braun.jpg

Alexander Linn


Thorsten Braun

Germany's Federal Tax Court (BFH) issued a decision (case reference I R 10/14) on March 11 2015 in which it held that controlled foreign company (CFC) income is not subject to German trade tax. The BFH concluded that CFC income constitutes deemed income of a foreign permanent establishment (PE) for German tax purposes and, thus, is deductible from the trade tax base. The BFH overturned a 2012 decision of the lower court of Düsseldorf (16 K 2513/12), putting to rest a long-standing controversy on this issue. Under Germany's CFC rules, CFC income arises if a foreign subsidiary that is controlled by German shareholders earns low-taxed passive income. Any income that is not included in an exhaustive list of active income would be deemed passive income (passive income would include, but is not limited to, interest and most types of royalty payments). The low-taxation threshold is set at 25% even though Germany reduced the corporate income tax rate from 25% to 15% in 2007. CFC income is taxed currently in the hands of the German shareholders as a deemed dividend, to which exemptions and other dividend relief mechanisms do not apply. Even though CFC income is included in the corporate tax income base and, thus, also in the starting point for the income calculated for trade tax purposes, any foreign tax paid by the CFC is creditable only against corporate income tax and not against trade tax, so the application of the CFC rules could lead to incongruous results. Referring to the territorial scope of German trade tax, the court held that CFC income can be seen as income deemed to arise in a foreign permanent establishment which has to be eliminated from the trade tax base.

As a consequence, CFC income attributed to German entities would only be taxed at a 15.825% rate (corporate income tax, including the solidarity surcharge). It remains to be seen if and how the legislator will react to this decision.

Alexander Linn (allinn@deloitte.de) and Thorsten Braun (tbraun@deloitte.de)

Deloitte

Tel: +49 89 29036 8558 and +49 69 75695 6444

Website: www.deloitte.de

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

In looking at the impact of taxation, money won't always be all there is to it
Australia’s Tax Practitioners Board is set to kick off 2026 with a new secretary to head the administrative side of its regulatory activities.
Ireland’s Department of Finance reported increased income tax, VAT and corporation tax receipts from 2024; in other news, it’s understood that HSBC has agreed to pay the French treasury to settle a tax investigation
The Australian Taxation Office believes the Swedish furniture company has used TP to evade paying tax it owes
Supermarket chain Morrisons is facing a £17 million ($23 million) tax bill; in other news, Donald Trump has cut proposed tariffs
The controversial deal will allow US-parented groups to be carved out from key aspects of pillar two
Awards
ITR invites tax firms, in-house teams, and tax professionals to make submissions for the 2027 World Tax rankings and the 2026 ITR Tax Awards globally
Pillar two was ‘weakened’ when it altered from a multinational convention agreement to simply national domestic law, Federico Bertocchi also argued
Imposing the tax on virtual assets is a measure that appears to have no legal, economic or statistical basis, one expert told ITR
The EU has seemingly capitulated to the US’s ‘side-by-side’ demands. This may be a win for the US, but the uncertainty has only just begun for pillar two
Gift this article