International Tax Review is part of the Delinian Group, Delinian Limited, 4 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX, Registered in England & Wales, Company number 00954730
Copyright © Delinian Limited and its affiliated companies 2023

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Chile: New instructions regarding provisional withholding on capital gains



Loreto Pelegrí

Javiera Bullemore

In May 2015 the Chilean IRS issued three new resolutions (No. 42, 43 and 48) which establish the procedures that shall be followed by withholding agents in order to be released or become subject to a lower withholding obligation upon the transfer of certain assets. These resolutions imply great news for foreign investors, as they make possible the elimination or reduction of the economic burden that the provisional withholding represented in many cross-border transactions, in cases where no additional tax (withholding tax) was actually triggered or lower rates were applicable.

The current withholding provisions set forth by article 74 No.4 of the Chilean Income Tax Law were introduced by Law No. 20.630 of September 2012.

Regarding the transfer of Chilean shares or quotas held by an entity not domiciled norr resident in Chile, such provision establishes that, as a general rule, the acquirer of Chilean shares or quotas shall perform a provisional withholding which shall be declared and paid to the Chilean Treasury within the first 12 days of the month following the transaction.

The provisional withholding shall be performed with different rates depending if the capital gains are subject to the general tax regime, or to the first category tax (corporate tax) as a sole tax, and depending on whether or not it is possible to determine a capital gain as a result of the transaction.

The law establishes that exceptionally, withholding agents may be released of performing the relevant withholding, if they are able to prove, by the procedure established in a resolution by the Chilean IRS , that: (i) the relevant additional tax was duly paid by the beneficiary of the income; (ii) the income obtained constitutes a nontaxable or exempted income; (iii) a tax loss was triggered as a result of the transaction; or (iv) no additional tax or a lower rate shall be applied due to the application of a double tax treaty (DTT).

Thus, until the issuance of such resolution, in cases where – as a result of the transfer of the Chilean shares or quotas – a tax loss was triggered for the transferor, or a lower tax rate was applicable due to the application of a DTT, the payer or acquirer of the shares or quotas was obliged to perform the provisional withholding anyway, even though no capital gains were obtained by the foreign transferor, or a lower rate was applicable.

In such cases, the transferor or beneficiary of the income supported the economic burden of the provisional withholding, being entitled to request the refund of the amounts provisionally withheld in excess during April of the year following the transaction.

This problem was solved by Resolution No. 42, 43 and 48 which gave applicability to the provisions of Article 74 No.4 of the Chilean ITL, by establishing the procedure that shall be followed by the withholding agents in order to be released from their withholding obligations in the cases previously mentioned, or to perform the withholding with a lower rate, as the case may be.

Loreto Pelegrí ( and Javiera Bullemore (


Tel: +562 29400155


more across site & bottom lb ros

More from across our site

The controversial measure is being watered down after criticism from the European Central Bank.
More than 600 such requests were made in 2022, while HMRC has also bolstered its fraud service, it has been revealed.
The General Court reverses its position taken four years ago, while the UN discusses tax policy in New York.
Discussion on amount B under the first part of the OECD's two-pronged approach to international tax reform is far from over, if the latest consultation is anything go by.
Pillar two might be top of mind for many multinational companies, but the huge variations between countries’ readiness means getting ahead of the game now, argues Russell Gammon, chief solutions officer at Tax Systems.
ITR’s latest quarterly PDF is going live today, leading on the looming battle between the UN and the OECD for dominance in global tax policy.
Company tax changes are central to the German government’s plan to revive the economy, but sources say they miss the mark. Ralph Cunningham reports.
The winners of the ITR Americas Tax Awards have been announced for 2023!
There is a ‘huge demand’ for tax services in the Middle East, says new Clyde & Co partner Rachel Fox in an interview with ITR.
The ECB warns the tax could leave banks with weaker capital levels, while the UAE publishes guidance on its new corporate tax regime.