Switzerland: Revised draft legislation on Corporate Tax Reform III introduced into parliament

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Switzerland: Revised draft legislation on Corporate Tax Reform III introduced into parliament

kistler.jpg

zulauf.jpg

Jacques Kistler


Rene Zulauf

On June 5 the Swiss federal government introduced revised draft legislation on Corporate Tax Reform III (CTR III), which would sunset all special corporate tax regimes, such as mixed or holding company regimes. The draft legislation contains various measures to compensate for the elimination of beneficial tax regimes:

  • Reduction of headline tax rates on a cantonal/communal level at the discretion of cantons;

  • Introduction of a patent box applicable to patented IP for which the R&D spend occurred in Switzerland (in line with the OECD's modified nexus approach);

  • Introduction of excess R&D deductions at the discretion of cantons;

  • Allowing a step-up (including for self-created goodwill) for direct federal and cantonal/communal taxes upon the migration of a company or of additional activities and functions to Switzerland;

  • Tax privileged release of hidden reserves for cantonal/communal tax purposes for companies transitioning out of tax privileged cantonal tax regimes (such as mixed or holding companies) in a manner that this would reduce the cantonal/communal tax rate over a period of five years, such that in some cantons the previous tax privileged rate could be achieved for a period of five years.

  • Reduction of the cantonal/communal capital tax in relation to holding of participations and patented IP at the discretion of cantons;

  • Abolition of the 1% capital issuance tax on equity contributions;

  • Extension of the eligibility for foreign tax credits to Swiss permanent establishments of foreign entities.

The revised draft legislation is in some ways more attractive and in other ways more restrictive than the initial draft legislation introduced last year. CTR III is, however, still a work in progress and may change depending on the success of stakeholder lobbying.

The two-chamber Swiss parliament should vote on CTR III in autumn 2015 and spring 2016 respectively. There may also be a national referendum to allow the public to vote on the issue. Cantonal tax laws would subsequently have to be amended to reflect the changes, so that the most likely date for the law to become effective would be January 1 2019.

Jacques Kistler (jkistler@deloitte.ch) and Rene Zulauf (rzulauf@deloitte.ch)

Deloitte

Tel: +41 58 279 8164 and +41 58 279 6359

Website: www.deloitte.ch

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

The US president also unveiled a new 50% levy on copper imports; in other news, a UK wealth tax proposal has been criticised by the Institute for Fiscal Studies
Wim Wuyts, who had been head of the specialist tax network since 2017, is moving on to a new role with WTS’s Belgian member firm
MNEs are increasingly using algorithmic tools in TP. Sahasranshu Dash argues that data ethics should therefore plug directly into the TP design process
The Institute of Chartered Accountants in England and Wales also queried whether HMRC resources could be better spent scrutinising larger entities
Grant Thornton’s Austria tax head likens his practice to an escape room, shares his football coaching ambitions, and explains why tax is cool
Awards
ITR is delighted to reveal all the shortlisted nominees for the 2025 EMEA Tax Awards
Awards
ITR is delighted to reveal all the shortlisted nominees for the 2025 Asia-Pacific Tax Awards
The fates of pillars one and two hang in the balance after the US successfully threw its weight around in G7 and Canadian negotiations
Rafael Tena tells ITR about the ‘crazy’ Mexican market, ditching the hourly rate, and refusing to grow his fledgling firm in an ‘unstructured way’
It should be easy for advisers to be transparent about costs, Brown Rudnick partner Matthew Sharp said in response to exclusive ITR in-house data
Gift this article