Switzerland: Revised draft legislation on Corporate Tax Reform III introduced into parliament

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Switzerland: Revised draft legislation on Corporate Tax Reform III introduced into parliament

kistler.jpg

zulauf.jpg

Jacques Kistler


Rene Zulauf

On June 5 the Swiss federal government introduced revised draft legislation on Corporate Tax Reform III (CTR III), which would sunset all special corporate tax regimes, such as mixed or holding company regimes. The draft legislation contains various measures to compensate for the elimination of beneficial tax regimes:

  • Reduction of headline tax rates on a cantonal/communal level at the discretion of cantons;

  • Introduction of a patent box applicable to patented IP for which the R&D spend occurred in Switzerland (in line with the OECD's modified nexus approach);

  • Introduction of excess R&D deductions at the discretion of cantons;

  • Allowing a step-up (including for self-created goodwill) for direct federal and cantonal/communal taxes upon the migration of a company or of additional activities and functions to Switzerland;

  • Tax privileged release of hidden reserves for cantonal/communal tax purposes for companies transitioning out of tax privileged cantonal tax regimes (such as mixed or holding companies) in a manner that this would reduce the cantonal/communal tax rate over a period of five years, such that in some cantons the previous tax privileged rate could be achieved for a period of five years.

  • Reduction of the cantonal/communal capital tax in relation to holding of participations and patented IP at the discretion of cantons;

  • Abolition of the 1% capital issuance tax on equity contributions;

  • Extension of the eligibility for foreign tax credits to Swiss permanent establishments of foreign entities.

The revised draft legislation is in some ways more attractive and in other ways more restrictive than the initial draft legislation introduced last year. CTR III is, however, still a work in progress and may change depending on the success of stakeholder lobbying.

The two-chamber Swiss parliament should vote on CTR III in autumn 2015 and spring 2016 respectively. There may also be a national referendum to allow the public to vote on the issue. Cantonal tax laws would subsequently have to be amended to reflect the changes, so that the most likely date for the law to become effective would be January 1 2019.

Jacques Kistler (jkistler@deloitte.ch) and Rene Zulauf (rzulauf@deloitte.ch)

Deloitte

Tel: +41 58 279 8164 and +41 58 279 6359

Website: www.deloitte.ch

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

Brazil’s shift to a nationwide consumption tax is more than conceptual; it fundamentally transforms municipal revenue, enforcement, and administrative disputes
While some advisers praised the ruling’s definition of a ‘voucher’ for VAT purposes, a UK partner said the case left unanswered questions
While pillar two has been enacted on paper in Brazil, companies are encountering a range of practical compliance issues, ITR has heard
Moore, founding partner of the Chicago tax boutique which bears her name, shares her career wisdom for ITR’s new Women in Tax interview series
But partners at the firm admit that jumping ship to the US would not be as easy as some believe
Governments are rewriting tax policy for the AI era, deploying digital taxes, tailored incentives and algorithmic enforcement that redefine where value is created
Wingrove will succeed Bill Thomas, who has served in the role since 2017; in other news, Andersen unveiled a sharp increase in revenues for 2025
Partners are divided on Italy vs PDM D’s analytical depth, evidentiary standards, and what the judgment signals for future intra-group financing cases
As GCCs increasingly become strategic hubs, multinationals face heightened risks around permanent establishment and place of effective management
While all options presented ‘drawbacks’, European Commission tax leader Wopke Hoekstra said the controversial US carve-out deal has ‘many benefits’
Gift this article