International Tax Review is part of the Delinian Group, Delinian Limited, 8 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX, Registered in England & Wales, Company number 00954730
Copyright © Delinian Limited and its affiliated companies 2023

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

US Outbound: IRS provides exception to PFIC reporting for certain marked-to-market stock



Sean Foley

Landon McGrew

The US Treasury Department and Internal Revenue Service (IRS) recently announced their intention to amend temporary regulations issued under section 1298(f) of the Internal Revenue Code to eliminate the requirement that a US person file a Form 8621, Information Return by a Shareholder of a Passive Foreign Investment Company or Qualified Electing Fund, with respect to investments in passive foreign investment company (PFIC) stock that is marked-to-market under any provision of the Internal Revenue Code, other than section 1296 (Notice 2014-51). The elimination of this filing requirement is particularly welcome for dealers that mark-to-market their investments in PFIC stock under section 475. As general background, a foreign corporation is a PFIC as defined in section 1297 if either (i) 75% or more of its gross income is passive income or (ii) 50% or more of the average value of its assets is held for the production of passive income. Sections 1291 through 1298 provide for three separate tax regimes for US holders of PFIC stock: (i) the excess distribution rules under section 1291; (ii) the qualified electing fund rules under section 1293; and (iii) the mark-to-market rules under section 1296. Section 1291(d)(1) provides a coordination rule for these three tax regimes, and extends that coordination rule to PFIC stock that is marked-to-market under other provisions of the Code, including section 475. Thus, the coordination rule provides that US holders of PFIC stock that is marked-to-market under any provision of the Code other than section 1296 are not subject to tax under any of the three PFIC regimes described above.

On December 31 2013, the Treasury Department and IRS issued temporary regulations under section 1298(f) providing that a US holder of PFIC stock is required to file a Form 8621 annually with respect to its investment in the PFIC. The temporary regulations provide certain exceptions to this filing requirement, including an exception where the aggregate value of PFIC stock is below a specified threshold. However, the temporary regulations did not provide an exception for holders of PFIC stock that is marked-to-market under a Code provision other than section 1296. Thus, the regulations required a US person that owned PFIC stock that was marked-to-market under, for example, section 475 to file a Form 8621.

In the Notice, the Treasury Department and IRS state that they have determined that a US holder of PFIC stock that is marked-to-market under a Code provision other than 1296 should not be required to file a Form 8621. Accordingly, the Notice provides a new exception. The exception will not, however, be available for taxable years in which the US person is required to apply the excess distribution rules of section 1291 pursuant to coordination rules in Reg. §1.1291-1(c)(4)(ii). In addition, the exception will not apply to the extent that PFIC stock is not in fact marked-to-market for any reason, including, for example, if it is treated as held for investment or as a hedge under section 475.

The Notice states that US holders of PFIC stock may rely on the new filing exception for taxable years ending on or after December 31 2013. The future final regulations incorporating the Notice will also have an effective date of December 31 2013.

The information contained herein is of a general nature and based on authorities that are subject to change. Applicability of the information to specific situations should be determined through consultation with your tax adviser.

This article represents the views of the authors only, and does not necessarily represent the views or professional advice of KPMG LLP.

Sean Foley ( Washington, DC, and Landon McGrew (, McLean, VA


Tel: +1 202 533 5588

Fax: +1 202 315 3087


more across site & bottom lb ros

More from across our site

An intense period of lobbying and persuasion is under way as the UN secretary-general’s report on the future of international tax cooperation begins to take shape. Ralph Cunningham reports.
Fresh details of the European Commission’s state aid case against Amazon emerge, while a pension fund is suing Amgen over its tax dispute with the Internal Revenue Service.
The OECD’s rules may be impossible for businesses to manage, according to tax experts from companies including Shell.
The UK government is now committed to replacing the ‘super-deduction’ with a 100% capital allowances regime to offset the impact of the corporate tax rise to 25%.
Corporate tax is set to rise in the UK for the first time in decades, but the headline rate remains historically low despite what many observers think.
President Joe Biden’s nominee is set to be confirmed as IRS commissioner for a five-year term.
British companies are waiting to hear the details of what will replace the 130% ‘super-deduction’ next week, while Spain considers stopping a major infrastructure company moving to the Netherlands.
President Joe Biden wants to raise corporate tax and impose a higher stock buyback tax on US businesses, but his budget proposal faces insurmountable obstacles in Congress, writes Ralph Cunningham.
EY is still negotiating the terms of the plan to split its audit and consulting functions, but the future of tax services is reportedly a sticking point.
Country-by-country reporting is the best option for safe harbour provisions under the global anti-base erosion rules, according to tax directors at companies including Standard Chartered Bank and Pernod Ricard.