US Outbound: IRS provides exception to PFIC reporting for certain marked-to-market stock

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

US Outbound: IRS provides exception to PFIC reporting for certain marked-to-market stock

foley.jpg

mcgrew.jpg

Sean Foley


Landon McGrew

The US Treasury Department and Internal Revenue Service (IRS) recently announced their intention to amend temporary regulations issued under section 1298(f) of the Internal Revenue Code to eliminate the requirement that a US person file a Form 8621, Information Return by a Shareholder of a Passive Foreign Investment Company or Qualified Electing Fund, with respect to investments in passive foreign investment company (PFIC) stock that is marked-to-market under any provision of the Internal Revenue Code, other than section 1296 (Notice 2014-51). The elimination of this filing requirement is particularly welcome for dealers that mark-to-market their investments in PFIC stock under section 475. As general background, a foreign corporation is a PFIC as defined in section 1297 if either (i) 75% or more of its gross income is passive income or (ii) 50% or more of the average value of its assets is held for the production of passive income. Sections 1291 through 1298 provide for three separate tax regimes for US holders of PFIC stock: (i) the excess distribution rules under section 1291; (ii) the qualified electing fund rules under section 1293; and (iii) the mark-to-market rules under section 1296. Section 1291(d)(1) provides a coordination rule for these three tax regimes, and extends that coordination rule to PFIC stock that is marked-to-market under other provisions of the Code, including section 475. Thus, the coordination rule provides that US holders of PFIC stock that is marked-to-market under any provision of the Code other than section 1296 are not subject to tax under any of the three PFIC regimes described above.

On December 31 2013, the Treasury Department and IRS issued temporary regulations under section 1298(f) providing that a US holder of PFIC stock is required to file a Form 8621 annually with respect to its investment in the PFIC. The temporary regulations provide certain exceptions to this filing requirement, including an exception where the aggregate value of PFIC stock is below a specified threshold. However, the temporary regulations did not provide an exception for holders of PFIC stock that is marked-to-market under a Code provision other than section 1296. Thus, the regulations required a US person that owned PFIC stock that was marked-to-market under, for example, section 475 to file a Form 8621.

In the Notice, the Treasury Department and IRS state that they have determined that a US holder of PFIC stock that is marked-to-market under a Code provision other than 1296 should not be required to file a Form 8621. Accordingly, the Notice provides a new exception. The exception will not, however, be available for taxable years in which the US person is required to apply the excess distribution rules of section 1291 pursuant to coordination rules in Reg. §1.1291-1(c)(4)(ii). In addition, the exception will not apply to the extent that PFIC stock is not in fact marked-to-market for any reason, including, for example, if it is treated as held for investment or as a hedge under section 475.

The Notice states that US holders of PFIC stock may rely on the new filing exception for taxable years ending on or after December 31 2013. The future final regulations incorporating the Notice will also have an effective date of December 31 2013.

The information contained herein is of a general nature and based on authorities that are subject to change. Applicability of the information to specific situations should be determined through consultation with your tax adviser.

This article represents the views of the authors only, and does not necessarily represent the views or professional advice of KPMG LLP.

Sean Foley (sffoley@kpmg.com) Washington, DC, and Landon McGrew (lmcgrew@kpmg.com), McLean, VA

KPMG

Tel: +1 202 533 5588

Fax: +1 202 315 3087

Website: www.us.kpmg.com

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

The threat of 50% tariffs on Brazilian goods coincides with new Brazilian legal powers to adopt retaliatory economic measures, local experts tell ITR
The country’s chancellor appears to have backtracked from previous pillar two scepticism; in other news, Donald Trump threatened Russia with 100% tariffs
In its latest G20 update, the OECD also revealed tense discussions with the US where the ‘significant threat’ of Section 899 was highlighted
The tax agency has increased compliance yield from wealthy individuals but cannot identify how much tax is paid by UK billionaires, the committee also claimed
Saffery cautioned that documentation requirements in new government proposals must be limited if medium-sized companies are not exempted from TP
The global minimum tax deal is not viable without US participation, Friedrich Merz has argued
Section 899 of the ‘one big beautiful’ bill would have spelled disaster for many international investors into the US, but following its shelving, attention turns to the fate of the OECD’s pillars
DLA Piper’s co-head of tax for the US and Latin America tells ITR about her fervent belief in equal access to the law, loving yoga, and paternal inspirations
Tax expert Craig Hillier agrees with the comparison of pillar two to using a sledgehammer to crack a nut
The amount is reported to be up 57% from the £5.6bn that the UK tax agency believes was underpaid in the previous year
Gift this article