International Tax Review is part of the Delinian Group, Delinian Limited, 8 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX, Registered in England & Wales, Company number 00954730
Copyright © Delinian Limited and its affiliated companies 2023

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Switzerland: Many more foreign-domiciled suppliers VAT liable from January 1 2015

suter.jpg

rodak.jpg

Benno Suter


Tomas Rodak

The Federal Ministers have concluded that pursuant to the new article 9a of the Swiss VAT Ordinance the general VAT exemption for foreign entities exclusively rendering services and goods that are subject to VAT reverse charge becomes limited to rendering of services only. Since installation, repair, maintenance and leasing, for example, qualify from a Swiss VAT perspective as a supply of goods, many foreign domiciled suppliers doing business in Switzerland have to thoroughly consider their obligation to register for VAT purposes in Switzerland if they generate annual turnover of more than CHF 100,000 with such supplies.

Although this new rule concerns predominantly small, non-Swiss resident craftsmen doing business in Switzerland and in the principality of Liechtenstein, multinational entities might also be affected. Since Switzerland applies a kind of VAT force of attraction, all rendered services of a foreign domiciled entity have to be taxed instead of applying the reverse charge obligation of the buyer once the supplying entity is Swiss VAT registered. No change is foreseen for foreign entities providing telecom or electronic services to Swiss or Liechtenstein resident customers (B2C). All foreign entities rendering such B2C services of more than CHF 100,000 a year must still be VAT registered in Switzerland. Furthermore, a revision of the Swiss VAT Law is on its way and is projected for January 1 2016. This revision defines the VAT registration threshold of CHF 100,000 no longer as Swiss but rather as global turnover that will oblige even more multinational entities to register for VAT purposes in Switzerland. The de-minimis rules for the importation of small goods are also under the scrutiny of the planned revision. If those de-minimis exemptions fall, even more foreign entities will have to register in Switzerland for VAT purposes from January 1 2016. Foreign domiciled entities with no domestic presence need to appoint a Swiss domiciled fiscal representative and have to consider their obligations as VAT payers.

Benno Suter (bsuter@deloitte.ch) and Tomas Rodak (trodak@deloitte.ch)

Deloitte

Tel: +41 58 279 63 66 and +41 58 279 63 64

Website: www.deloitte.ch

more across site & bottom lb ros

More from across our site

Premier League football clubs are accused of avoiding paying up to £470 million in UK tax, while Malta is poised to overhaul its unique corporate tax system.
Bartosz Doroszuk of MDDP offers insights on Poland’s new tax legislation on shifted profits, as the implementation deadline looms nearer.
Four tax specialists preview the UK’s transfer pricing requirements, which come into effect on April 1.
The rise of the QDMTT will likely change how countries compete on tax and transfer pricing policy, but it may not reverse decades of falling corporate tax rates.
ITR’s latest quarterly PDF is going live today, leading on the EU’s BEFIT initiative and wider tax reforms in the bloc.
COVID-19 and an overworked HMRC may have created the ‘perfect storm’ for reduced prosecutions, according to tax professionals.
Participants in the consultation on the UN secretary-general’s report into international tax cooperation are divided – some believe UN-led structures are the way forward, while others want to improve existing ones. Ralph Cunningham reports.
The German government unveils plans to implement pillar two, while EY is reportedly still divided over ‘Project Everest’.
With the M&A market booming, ITR has partnered with correspondents from firms around the globe to provide a guide to the deal structures being employed and tax authorities' responses.
Xing Hu, partner at Hui Ye Law Firm in Shanghai, looks at the implications of the US Uyghur Forced Labor Protection Act for TP comparability analysis of China.