Serbia: An overview of transfer pricing in Serbia

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Serbia: An overview of transfer pricing in Serbia

sagianni.jpg

Anastasia Sagianni

For some multinationals operating in Serbia in 2013 it was not the first year of implementation of the transfer pricing rules. The law governing this area has been present in Serbia for more than a decade. More specifically, transfer pricing rules have been present since July 1 2001, but the Serbian Rulebook that was enacted on July 2013 gave clarity to the country's transfer pricing rules. Nonetheless, multinational companies operating in Serbia already had their transfer pricing policies in place due mainly to the fact that their headquarters were in countries with established transfer pricing rules. For the large majority of entities, 2014 was the first year of implementation regarding transactions that took place during 2013. For those entities the procedure was demanding both for their financial departments and their advisers.

Is there a 'right' or 'wrong' way to prepare a transfer pricing study?

The application of the arm's-length principle requires the ability to see the nature of each inter-company transaction by understanding also under what circumstances those transactions took place, interpreting comparable situations and applying judgment. Moreover, since transfer pricing is not an exact science, there is no right or wrong but there are some risky areas where taxpayers should be very careful. For example, by saying merely that the applied margin is in accordance with the group's policy you do not document that the transaction is in accordance with the arm's-length principle. Also by preparing a transfer pricing study which does not include a justification for the selected TP method you may face a pitfall because in a potential transfer pricing audit tax authorities in Serbia may have another opinion about the selected method.

Anastasia Sagianni (anastasia.sagianni@eurofast.eu)

Eurofast Global, Belgrade office

Tel: +381 11 3241 484

Website: www.eurofast.eu

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

As ITR data reveals that 2025 saw more than double the amount of private client hires than 2024, it seems firms are jostling for position
The US multinational paid 20% more tax in 2025 than 2024, it said; in other news, more than 25,000 HMRC staff have been upskilled on AI
Belt and Road Initiative countries face tax incentive conundrums due to pillar two, but relatively few countries would seek to scrap the project, ITR has heard
Hany Elnaggar examines how the OECD’s global minimum tax is reshaping the GCC’s investment incentive landscape, shifting the region from rate-based competition toward substance-driven economic positioning
The acquisition of a two-partner practice from Stephenson Harwood means that Charles Russell Speechlys has the largest private client team in Asia, the firm claimed
Complex and constantly shifting rules on global mobility mean ‘the risk is too great’ for staff to work abroad on personal time, EY’s Maureen Flood tells ITR
While it’s great that the OECD is alive to multinationals’ fears of being caught in a compliance trap, the ‘common understanding’ illustrates a worrying lack of readiness
Rising demand for specialist expertise has fuelled the growth in tax partner headcounts, Cain Dwyer found; in other news, Switzerland has been urged to reconsider pillar two
An OECD report on the taxation of the digital economy is expected by the end of 2026, according to the group of nations
Trophy assets are evolving from personal indulgences to structured investments, prompting family offices to prioritise tax efficiency, governance discipline, and cross-border compliance
Gift this article