International Tax Review is part of the Delinian Group, Delinian Limited, 8 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX, Registered in England & Wales, Company number 00954730
Copyright © Delinian Limited and its affiliated companies 2023

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

China: New Chinese indirect offshore disposal rules issued



Khoonming Ho

Lewis Lu

On February 3 2015 the Chinese State Administration of Taxation (SAT) issued Announcement 7 (SAT Announcement [2015] No.7), replacing the PRC's indirect offshore equity disposal reporting and taxation rules in Circular 698, promulgated in 2009, with a substantially new and more comprehensive approach. Announcement 7 will likely have a significant impact on M&A transactions and corporate restructurings undertaken by multinational enterprises involving China enterprises and assets. Announcement 7 expands the scope of indirect transfer transactions potentially subject to corporate income tax (CIT) from the Circular 698 rules and provides that "indirect transfers of assets, including shares of Chinese resident enterprises, by non-resident enterprises, through arrangements without reasonable business purposes which aim to avoid CIT, are to be re-characterised and treated as direct transfers of Chinese taxable property in accordance with CIT Law article 47".

"Chinese taxable property" refers to assets of a Chinese establishment or place of business, immovable property in China and equity investment in PRC resident enterprises, and so on. Any transaction involving a "transfer of equity and other similar interests" in the foreign enterprise which "results in identical or similar transactional outcomes to a direct transfer" is caught. This includes "a restructuring by a non-resident enterprise that results in a change of the foreign enterprise's shareholders". Potentially caught transactions include transfer of partnership interests or convertible debt, and share dilutions.

In assessing how reasonable business purposes are to be determined, Announcement 7 calls for a "comprehensive analysis of real facts and circumstances" and clarifies several specific factors to be considered. It also specifies certain arrangements which can be "automatically" deemed to lack reasonable business purposes. However, on the positive side, Announcement 7 provides safe harbour rules, that is, intra-group reorganisation relief will apply where a commonality of ownership test is met.

For indirect offshore transfers of assets of a Chinese establishment or place of business of a foreign enterprise, the resulting gains are to be included with the annual CIT filing of the Chinese establishment or place of business being transferred and be taxed at the 25% CIT rate on an assessment basis. For Chinese immovable property or equity in a Chinese tax resident enterprise, a withholding tax (WHT) mechanism is applied. The WHT agent is who owes an obligation to make the relevant payments to the share transferor. Compared to Circular 698, Announcement 7 constitutes a significant acceleration in the timing of tax payments.

The transaction reporting arrangements are also significantly altered. Firstly, the tax authorities are empowered to request documentation and information from the transferee, the transferor, the transferred Chinese enterprise and tax advisers. Besides, as Announcement 7 introduces a withholding obligation for the buyer, where neither the WHT agent nor the share transferor has paid tax, the WHT agent/buyer may be relieved from potential penalty by voluntarily submitting specified documentation and information within 30 days of the conclusion of the transfer agreement.

Announcement 7 provides that the in-charge tax authorities must conduct indirect transfer investigations and adjustments in line with the general anti-tax avoidance rules (GAAR). However, the in-charge tax authority will report the case up to the SAT within 30 days after the tax is paid.

Announcement 7 is effective from the date of issuance and will apply to transfers occurring before the issuance, in respect of which no Circular 698 tax filing or processing procedures have yet been conducted.

Khoonming Ho (

KPMG, China and Hong Kong SAR

Tel. +86 (10) 8508 7082

Lewis Lu (

KPMG, Central China

Tel. +86 (21) 2212 3421

more across site & bottom lb ros

More from across our site

An intense period of lobbying and persuasion is under way as the UN secretary-general’s report on the future of international tax cooperation begins to take shape. Ralph Cunningham reports.
Fresh details of the European Commission’s state aid case against Amazon emerge, while a pension fund is suing Amgen over its tax dispute with the Internal Revenue Service.
The OECD’s rules may be impossible for businesses to manage, according to tax experts from companies including Shell.
The UK government is now committed to replacing the ‘super-deduction’ with a 100% capital allowances regime to offset the impact of the corporate tax rise to 25%.
Corporate tax is set to rise in the UK for the first time in decades, but the headline rate remains historically low despite what many observers think.
President Joe Biden’s nominee is set to be confirmed as IRS commissioner for a five-year term.
British companies are waiting to hear the details of what will replace the 130% ‘super-deduction’ next week, while Spain considers stopping a major infrastructure company moving to the Netherlands.
President Joe Biden wants to raise corporate tax and impose a higher stock buyback tax on US businesses, but his budget proposal faces insurmountable obstacles in Congress, writes Ralph Cunningham.
EY is still negotiating the terms of the plan to split its audit and consulting functions, but the future of tax services is reportedly a sticking point.
Country-by-country reporting is the best option for safe harbour provisions under the global anti-base erosion rules, according to tax directors at companies including Standard Chartered Bank and Pernod Ricard.