EU: Update on patent boxes and the EU Code of Conduct Group (Business Taxation)

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

EU: Update on patent boxes and the EU Code of Conduct Group (Business Taxation)

van-der-made.jpg

van der Made

The Italian EU Presidency's Code of Conduct Group (Business Taxation) six-monthly progress report to the ECOFIN Council was finalised on December 11 2014. On patent boxes, following all discussions in the OECD Forum on Harmful Tax Practices (FHTP) around BEPS Action 5, a compromise regarding the modified nexus approach and how to assess whether there is substantial activity in an IP regime, was endorsed by the Code Group on November 20 2014. The Code Group agreed that all the EU patent box regimes that had been subject to examination by the Group are not compatible with the modified nexus approach as adapted by the compromise. As a consequence, these EU patent boxes should therefore be changed in line with the compromise. As part of the agreement, countries with existing IP regimes must agree to close these to new entrants by June 30 2016 and will abolish them by June 30 2021, after which all countries will be required to operate only nexus-compliant regimes. New entrants can therefore still enter the existing patent boxes until June 2016 and benefit from the five year grandfathering. The Code Group agreed that the legislative process necessary to give effect to that change and the related monitoring by the Code Group should commence in 2015. The Netherlands has made a reservation regarding the scope of IP assets qualifying for tax benefits under an IP regime in respect of the compromise regarding the modified nexus approach.

The modified nexus approach allows a taxpayer to receive benefits on IP income in line with the expenditures linked to generating the income. The UK-German proposal has since been endorsed by all OECD and G20 countries.

Bob van der Made (bob.van.der.made@nl.pwc.com)

PwC Brussels

Tel: +31 88 792 3696

Website: www.pwc.com/eudtg

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

The controversial deal will allow US-parented groups to be carved out from key aspects of pillar two
Awards
ITR invites tax firms, in-house teams, and tax professionals to make submissions for the 2027 World Tax rankings and the 2026 ITR Tax Awards globally
Pillar two was ‘weakened’ when it altered from a multinational convention agreement to simply national domestic law, Federico Bertocchi also argued
Imposing the tax on virtual assets is a measure that appears to have no legal, economic or statistical basis, one expert told ITR
The EU has seemingly capitulated to the US’s ‘side-by-side’ demands. This may be a win for the US, but the uncertainty has only just begun for pillar two
The £7.4m buyout marks MHA’s latest acquisition since listing on the London Stock Exchange earlier this year
ITR’s most prolific stories of the year charted public pillar two spats, the continued fallout from the PwC Australia tax leaks scandal, and a headline tax fraud trial
The climbdowns pave the way for a side-by-side deal to be concluded this week, as per the US Treasury secretary’s expectation; in other news, Taft added a 10-partner tax team
A vote to be held in 2026 could create Hogan Lovells Cadwalader, a $3.6bn giant with 3,100 lawyers across the Americas, EMEA and Asia Pacific
Foreign companies operating in Libya face source-based taxation even without a local presence. Multinationals must understand compliance obligations, withholding risks, and treaty relief to avoid costly surprises
Gift this article