China: New regulations to encourage corporate restructuring and investment with non-monetary assets

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

China: New regulations to encourage corporate restructuring and investment with non-monetary assets

ho.jpg

lu.jpg

Khoonming Ho


Lewis Lu

The State Council issued a circular – 'Guidelines on further optimising market environment for M&A restructuring' – which requires finance and tax authorities to "amend the regulations governing special tax treatment for M&A restructuring activities". As a response, in December 2014, the Ministry of Finance and the State Administration of Taxation jointly issued Circular 109 (Caishui [2014] No.109) and Circular 116 (Caishui [2014] No.116) respectively to provide further clarity on the special restructuring under Circular 59 (Caishui [2009] No.59) as well as investment with non-monetary assets. Circular 109 relaxes the 'ratio limits' in relation to share or asset acquisition to enjoy special restructuring under Circular 59. For a share (asset) acquisition, the shares (assets) acquired should be at least 75% of the total shares (assets) of the acquiree entity under Circular 59, while the minimum ratio limit is reduced to 50% under Circular 109.

Circular 109 also adds the following two additional situations which can qualify for special restructuring:

  • The PRC transferor and the PRC transferee have a 100% direct-investment holding relationship; or

  • The PRC transferor and the PRC transferee are 100% directly owned by the same PRC shareholder or the same group of PRC shareholders

The CIT treatment for investment with non-monetary assets under Circular 91 (Caishui [2013] No. 91), which was adopted for entities in Shanghai's pilot free trade zone, has been expanded to the rest of China due to the release of Circular 116.

Table 1

Entity

Tax treatment

Investor

Tax treatment for the gains derived from investment with non-monetary assets Investment gains = fair market value (FMV) of the invested assets – tax basis of the assets

(Investment gains can be realised equally for no more than five years for CIT purposes.

The investment gains will be realised when the investment agreement becomes effective and relevant registrations have proceeded.)

Tax treatment for the shares of the investee obtained

Tax basis of the shares obtained = the original tax basis of the invested assets + investment gain realised each year

(The tax basis should be adjusted each year in line with the investment gain realised.)

Investee

Tax basis of the non-monetary assets obtained = FMV

If the investor later transfers the shares obtained or retracts those investments or is liquidated, the above tax deferral treatment is terminated and all the gains are immediately subject to CIT.

Circular 106 also adds that investment with non-monetary assets includes situations when a new PRC resident enterprise is established with non-monetary assets or an existing PRC resident enterprise is injected with such assets. When the entity conducts investment with non-monetary assets and it also qualifies for special restructuring under Circular 59, the entity can elect such special tax treatment stipulated in Circular 59.

Both Circular 109 and Circular 116 took effect January 1 2014 and are valid for cases unresolved before the issuance date of the circulars.

Khoonming Ho (khoonming.ho@kpmg.com)

KPMG, China and Hong Kong SAR

Tel: +86 (10) 8508 7082

Lewis Lu (lewis.lu@kpmg.com)

KPMG, Central China

Tel: +86 (21) 2212 3421

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

The threat of 50% tariffs on Brazilian goods coincides with new Brazilian legal powers to adopt retaliatory economic measures, local experts tell ITR
The country’s chancellor appears to have backtracked from previous pillar two scepticism; in other news, Donald Trump threatened Russia with 100% tariffs
In its latest G20 update, the OECD also revealed tense discussions with the US where the ‘significant threat’ of Section 899 was highlighted
The tax agency has increased compliance yield from wealthy individuals but cannot identify how much tax is paid by UK billionaires, the committee also claimed
Saffery cautioned that documentation requirements in new government proposals must be limited if medium-sized companies are not exempted from TP
The global minimum tax deal is not viable without US participation, Friedrich Merz has argued
Section 899 of the ‘one big beautiful’ bill would have spelled disaster for many international investors into the US, but following its shelving, attention turns to the fate of the OECD’s pillars
DLA Piper’s co-head of tax for the US and Latin America tells ITR about her fervent belief in equal access to the law, loving yoga, and paternal inspirations
Tax expert Craig Hillier agrees with the comparison of pillar two to using a sledgehammer to crack a nut
The amount is reported to be up 57% from the £5.6bn that the UK tax agency believes was underpaid in the previous year
Gift this article