Germany: Exemption to Germany’s change-in-ownership rules expanded

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Germany: Exemption to Germany’s change-in-ownership rules expanded

Linn-Alexander
Braun-Thorsten

Alexander Linn

Thorsten Braun

The German tax reform 2015, published in the federal gazette on November 5 2015, includes a new exemption from the strict change-in-ownership rules that result in the forfeiture of tax loss carryforwards.

According to the change-in-ownership rules introduced in the 2008 business tax reform, a direct or indirect transfer of more than 25% of the shares of an entity to an acquirer will result in a pro rata forfeiture of tax loss carryforwards; a transfer of more than 50% of the shares will result in a complete forfeiture of tax loss carryforwards.

For transfers after December 31 2009, an exemption for intra-group reorganisations applied in cases where the 'same person' held directly or indirectly a 100% participation in both the transferring and the purchasing entity. However, the exemption did not apply to a share transfer from or to the ultimate parent entity and where the ultimate parent entity was not held by the 'same person', which would be the case, for example, for any stock exchange-listed company.

The tax reform 2015 extends the intra-group exemption rule to apply to changes of shareholders within a 100% controlled group, including the situation where an ultimate parent is the transferring or the purchasing entity and is held by more than one person. Additionally, the ultimate shareholder can be a partnership or an individual; this had been an area of uncertainty and the Federal Ministry of Finance had issued a draft decree that would not allow a partnership or individual to be the ultimate shareholder.

The new rules apply retroactively to share transfers taking place after December 31 2009, thus allowing taxpayers to benefit in cases where tax losses were already forfeited under the previous wording of the law.

Alexander Linn (allinn@deloitte.de) and Thorsten Braun (tbraun@deloitte.de)

Deloitte

Tel: +49 89 29036 8558 and +49 69 75695 6444

Website: www.deloitte.de

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

Pillar two compliance is creating unprecedented data demands for multinational tax departments, making closer collaboration with FP&A teams essential for accurate reporting and audit readiness
Among the arrivals is Andrew Howell, who leaves scandal-hit PwC Australia after representing PepsiCo in a high-profile TP dispute
ITR's podcast examines whether the big four have overarching cultural issues and assesses the competitive threat of technology-backed transfer pricing firms
The UK advisory firm has seen its global revenues expand by £27.2m following its listing and acquisition of Baker Tilly South-East Europe
Tax-trained John Sams, previously the firm’s CFO and COO, was appointed after a rigorous process, KPMG said
From Mauritius substance rules to Kenyan SEP tax and South African anti-avoidance measures, businesses must navigate growing scrutiny of cross-border IP structures in Africa
ITR spoke to multinationals, advisers and software providers about a June 30 deadline defined by faulty portals, high compliance costs and hard lessons
After years of onerous pillar two prep, businesses will be galled in seeing tax revenues outweighed by compliance costs
Tax advisers should revisit India secondment arrangements after the EY US ruling strengthened the Centrica precedent and raised fresh withholding concerns
Despite the shortfall, effective tax rates of multinationals have seen a ‘statistically significant rise’
Gift this article