Italy: Companies migrating to Italy: New ‘internationalisation’ decree introduces rules to determine assets and liabilities’ tax basis

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Italy: Companies migrating to Italy: New ‘internationalisation’ decree introduces rules to determine assets and liabilities’ tax basis

Foglia-Giuliano
Emma-Marco

Giuliano Foglia

Marco Emma

The 'internationalisation' decree (formally, legislative decree No 147 of September 14 2015) has been recently published on the Official Gazette and is now effective.

The decree introduced different measures aimed at removing uncertainties and providing a more definite and stable tax legal framework, with a view to attracting foreign investors. Above all, the decree introduced, for the first time, a clear provision in relation to the corporate income tax effects for foreign companies migrating to Italy. Italian tax law did not previously cover such case.

According to article 12 of the decree, the transfer of tax residence from a white-list country to Italy involves the step-up of the tax basis of foreign company's assets and liabilities at fair market value, regardless of the application of an 'exit tax' in the state from which assets are transferred. In case of 'inbound' migration from a non-white listed country, the above mentioned step up is subject to the conclusion of an international ruling (APA) with the Italian tax authorities. If no ruling is obtained, the 'non-white list' company shall assume the lower between the acquisition cost, the book value or the market value as tax basis of the assets 'relocated' to Italy, while the tax basis of the liabilities will be the higher among such values.

Such provision, effective from fiscal year 2015, represents an impressive step forward, compared with the previous situation of uncertainty. Due to the lack of any provision in this respect, in fact, it was widely debated before the internationalisation decree whether transferred assets had to be valuated according (i) to the market value or alternatively (ii) to the acquisition cost method. Even if the market value principle seems to prevail (as implicitly confirmed now by the new decree), the Italian Revenue Agency occasionally took the position that the tax step up of assets relocated to Italy was allowed only provided that the state from which the assets were transferred applied an 'exit tax'. Difficulties arose where an exit tax in principle applied but a specific exemption regime was granted by the exit state on certain assets (for example, the participation exemption regime).

In this context, not only does the new provision fill a legislative gap in the Italian tax framework, but it also represents an alluring occasion for foreign investors to step up the tax basis of their assets.

Interesting tax opportunities, in particular, may arise in relation to intellectual properties held by non-Italian resident companies from the combination of the new 'inbound' migration step up possibility with the partial corporate income tax exemption available under the new Italian Patent Box regime. In a nutshell, the Patent Box allows a 50% corporate income tax exemption in relation to income deriving from direct or indirect use of certain IP rights (currently including commercial trademarks). Such optional regime applies, under certain circumstances, on the basis of the ratio of a) R&D expenses borne to maintain, increase and develop the intangible asset, and to b) total expenses sustained for the creation of such IP right.

Giuliano Foglia (foglia@virtax.it) and Marco Emma (emma@virtax.it)

Tremonti Vitali Romagnoli Piccardi e Associati

Tel: +39 06 3218022 (Rome); +39 02 58313707 (Milan)

Website: www.virtax.it

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

The threat of 50% tariffs on Brazilian goods coincides with new Brazilian legal powers to adopt retaliatory economic measures, local experts tell ITR
The country’s chancellor appears to have backtracked from previous pillar two scepticism; in other news, Donald Trump threatened Russia with 100% tariffs
In its latest G20 update, the OECD also revealed tense discussions with the US where the ‘significant threat’ of Section 899 was highlighted
The tax agency has increased compliance yield from wealthy individuals but cannot identify how much tax is paid by UK billionaires, the committee also claimed
Saffery cautioned that documentation requirements in new government proposals must be limited if medium-sized companies are not exempted from TP
The global minimum tax deal is not viable without US participation, Friedrich Merz has argued
Section 899 of the ‘one big beautiful’ bill would have spelled disaster for many international investors into the US, but following its shelving, attention turns to the fate of the OECD’s pillars
DLA Piper’s co-head of tax for the US and Latin America tells ITR about her fervent belief in equal access to the law, loving yoga, and paternal inspirations
Tax expert Craig Hillier agrees with the comparison of pillar two to using a sledgehammer to crack a nut
The amount is reported to be up 57% from the £5.6bn that the UK tax agency believes was underpaid in the previous year
Gift this article