International Tax Review is part of the Delinian Group, Delinian Limited, 8 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX, Registered in England & Wales, Company number 00954730
Copyright © Delinian Limited and its affiliated companies 2023

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Switzerland: Amendments to the expatriate ordinance – merely a clarification?



Per Melberg

Karin Verheijen

Before the start of this millennium, a number of the cantons in Switzerland had their own expatriate ordinance, which was one of the elements used to attract foreign business and talent to their particular canton. In 2000, the federal expatriate ordinance was issued as a part of the tax harmonisation effort between the cantons. The ordinance was widely followed by the cantons but as it was issued as an ordinance, the cantons had room for interpretation. This has led to significant differences in the application of the ordinance. The newly published amendments to the expatriate ordinance, which will come into effect on January 1 2016, clarify a number of the terms used in the former expatriate ordinance, but as the title indicates it is still an ordinance, with room for cantonal interpretation when applied in practice.

What's new?

  • Maximum application of the expatriate ordinance for up to five years – not all cantons have been consistent on this point in the past, so a certain alignment may take place;

  • General lump-sum deduction of CHF 1,500 in lieu of actual costs will only be granted if home country housing is still available to the foreign local hire (FLH) or international assignee (IA) during the stay in Switzerland;

  • Actual housing cost deduction will only be allowed if the FLH or IA permanently and readily has home country housing available. Deductible amount is determined by the cantonal tax authorities;

  • Schooling costs can only be deducted for up to five years. The school sponsoring system is still accepted in lieu of actual schooling costs, however, only for a maximum of five years for the FLH/IA; and

  • Relocation lump-sums or reimbursements (so-called curtain allowance) are no longer deductible. Only direct costs related to the relocation, such as flights and removal costs, may be deducted.

Who can use the expatriate ordinance?

  • Executive employees and specialists with an assignment letter from the home entity to the Swiss entity.

  • Foreign local hires (executive employees and specialists) who are transferred to the Swiss entity may be able to use the new expatriate ordinance. It is a requirement, however, that there is a guarantee of re-employment with the home entity.

The major change in the new expatriate ordinance is that FLHs (executive employees and specialists) who are hired externally to the Swiss entity will no longer be able to use the ordinance. In the past, this was possible in a number of cantons. We also expect the tax authorities to apply a stricter definition of "executive employees and specialists", with the result that the group of employees eligible for benefitting from the ordinance will become more limited.

The amendments to the expatriate ordinance primarily seek to clarify and harmonise the application of the ordinance, which in itself is positive. It may, however, result in an increased tax burden for foreign employees coming into Switzerland in a number of situations.

Per Melberg ( and Karin Verheijen (


Tel: +41 58 279 9018 and +41 58 279 9105


more across site & bottom lb ros

More from across our site

The German government unveils plans to implement pillar two, while EY is reportedly still divided over ‘Project Everest’.
With the M&A market booming, ITR has partnered with correspondents from firms around the globe to provide a guide to the deal structures being employed and tax authorities' responses.
Xing Hu, partner at Hui Ye Law Firm in Shanghai, looks at the implications of the US Uyghur Forced Labor Protection Act for TP comparability analysis of China.
Karl Berlin talks to Josh White about meeting the Fair Tax standard, the changing burden of country-by-country reporting, and how windfall taxes may hit renewable energy.
Sandy Markwick, head of the Tax Director Network (TDN) at Winmark, looks at the challenges of global mobility for tax management.
Taxpayers should look beyond the headline criteria of the simplification regime to ensure that their arrangements meet the arm’s-length standard, say Alejandro Ces and Mark Seddon of the EY New Zealand transfer pricing team.
In a recent webinar hosted by law firms Greenberg Traurig and Clayton Utz, officials at the IRS and ATO outlined their visions for 2023.
The Asia-Pacific awards research cycle has now begun – don’t miss on this opportunity be recognised in 2023
An intense period of lobbying and persuasion is under way as the UN secretary-general’s report on the future of international tax cooperation begins to take shape. Ralph Cunningham reports.
Fresh details of the European Commission’s state aid case against Amazon emerge, while a pension fund is suing Amgen over its tax dispute with the Internal Revenue Service.