Switzerland: Amendments to the expatriate ordinance – merely a clarification?
International Tax Review is part of the Delinian Group, Delinian Limited, 4 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX, Registered in England & Wales, Company number 00954730
Copyright © Delinian Limited and its affiliated companies 2023

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Switzerland: Amendments to the expatriate ordinance – merely a clarification?



Per Melberg

Karin Verheijen

Before the start of this millennium, a number of the cantons in Switzerland had their own expatriate ordinance, which was one of the elements used to attract foreign business and talent to their particular canton. In 2000, the federal expatriate ordinance was issued as a part of the tax harmonisation effort between the cantons. The ordinance was widely followed by the cantons but as it was issued as an ordinance, the cantons had room for interpretation. This has led to significant differences in the application of the ordinance. The newly published amendments to the expatriate ordinance, which will come into effect on January 1 2016, clarify a number of the terms used in the former expatriate ordinance, but as the title indicates it is still an ordinance, with room for cantonal interpretation when applied in practice.

What's new?

  • Maximum application of the expatriate ordinance for up to five years – not all cantons have been consistent on this point in the past, so a certain alignment may take place;

  • General lump-sum deduction of CHF 1,500 in lieu of actual costs will only be granted if home country housing is still available to the foreign local hire (FLH) or international assignee (IA) during the stay in Switzerland;

  • Actual housing cost deduction will only be allowed if the FLH or IA permanently and readily has home country housing available. Deductible amount is determined by the cantonal tax authorities;

  • Schooling costs can only be deducted for up to five years. The school sponsoring system is still accepted in lieu of actual schooling costs, however, only for a maximum of five years for the FLH/IA; and

  • Relocation lump-sums or reimbursements (so-called curtain allowance) are no longer deductible. Only direct costs related to the relocation, such as flights and removal costs, may be deducted.

Who can use the expatriate ordinance?

  • Executive employees and specialists with an assignment letter from the home entity to the Swiss entity.

  • Foreign local hires (executive employees and specialists) who are transferred to the Swiss entity may be able to use the new expatriate ordinance. It is a requirement, however, that there is a guarantee of re-employment with the home entity.

The major change in the new expatriate ordinance is that FLHs (executive employees and specialists) who are hired externally to the Swiss entity will no longer be able to use the ordinance. In the past, this was possible in a number of cantons. We also expect the tax authorities to apply a stricter definition of "executive employees and specialists", with the result that the group of employees eligible for benefitting from the ordinance will become more limited.

The amendments to the expatriate ordinance primarily seek to clarify and harmonise the application of the ordinance, which in itself is positive. It may, however, result in an increased tax burden for foreign employees coming into Switzerland in a number of situations.

Per Melberg (pmelberg@deloitte.ch) and Karin Verheijen (kverheijen@deloitte.ch)


Tel: +41 58 279 9018 and +41 58 279 9105

Website: www.deloitte.ch

more across site & bottom lb ros

More from across our site

Yusuf Akhmadi of Indonesia’s Directorate General of Taxation reports on the country’s latest domestic and cross-border initiatives to clamp down on tax evasion
The new rate is a blow to Samsung, while two law firms have made significant tax hires into their respective Washington DC offices
Rema Serafi, KPMG’s first-ever female vice chair for tax, talks about breaking the mould in an exclusive interview with ITR
The metal multinational’s victory, in a case worth $12 million, continues the trend of companies coming out on top against India’s revenue department
Guy Bud and Matthew Greene from litigation firm Stewarts review a dispute on tiered partnerships, which raises questions on corporation tax and partnership law
The stagnating pay and tax bonuses cap follow slashed payouts for the deals team and business consolidation in the last month
A greater UN role has been secured after disagreements between developed and developing countries over the OECD’s influence in global tax reform
The US-based firm picks up investment fund specialist Ceinwen Rees, while Ireland nearly doubles its corporation tax receipts in three years
The order comes amid controversy over another of David Collard’s companies’ tax and TP affairs
NASSCOM, which represents over 3,000 Indian companies, has argued for the removal of the segmentation rule