International Tax Review is part of the Delinian Group, Delinian Limited, 8 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX, Registered in England & Wales, Company number 00954730
Copyright © Delinian Limited and its affiliated companies 2023

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Germany: Tax Court confirms favourable tax treatment of dividends under tax group rules

linn.jpg

braun.jpg

Alexander Linn


Thorsten Braun

Germany's Federal Tax Court (BFH) issued a decision (I R 39/14) on December 17 2014 in which it confirmed the decision of the lower court of Muenster on the trade tax treatment of dividends distributed by a non-resident subsidiary to its German parent company that is a controlled entity in a German tax group. The lower court held that the dividends are fully exempt from trade tax and that German tax law does not provide for an add-back of 5% of the dividend income for trade tax purposes in tax groups. Under German law, dividends received by German companies from their German and foreign subsidiaries generally benefit from a 95% tax exemption if certain holding and substance requirements are met. As such, only 5% of the dividends are deemed non-deductible business expenses subject to taxation for corporate income tax and trade tax purposes.

Under the tax group rules, the income of the controlled entity is attributed to the controlling entity: for corporate income tax purposes, the 95% exemption for dividends is applied at the level of the controlling entity, but for trade tax purposes, a different rule provides for a full exemption at the level of the controlled entity. Since the trade tax income attributed to the controlled entity does not include any dividend income, there is no basis for applying the provision that adds back 5% of the dividend income as deemed nondeductible business expenses at the level of the controlling entity. According to the BFH, adding back 5% of the dividends at the level of the controlling entity would contradict the language of the statute.

The decision may seem surprising because it treats dividends distributed to a controlled entity within a German group differently from dividends distributed directly to the controlling entity in the group without an adequate reason. It should be noted that on May 8 2015, the upper house of the German parliament launched an initiative to codify the position of the tax authorities on the trade tax treatment of dividends distributed by a non-resident subsidiary to its German parent company that is a controlled company in a German tax group so that such dividends would only be 95% exempt. If this initiative becomes legislation, the favourable taxation of dividends in tax groups would come to an end.

Alexander Linn (allinn@deloitte.de) and Thorsten Braun (tbraun@deloitte.de)

Deloitte

Tel: +49 89 29036 8558 and +49 69 75695 6444

Website: www.deloitte.com/de

more across site & bottom lb ros

More from across our site

Two months since EU political agreement on pillar two and few member states have made progress on new national laws, but the arrival of OECD technical guidance should quicken the pace. Ralph Cunningham reports.
It’s one of the great ironies of recent history that a populist Republican may have helped make international tax policy more progressive.
Lawmakers have up to 120 days to decide the future of Brazil’s unique transfer pricing rules, but many taxpayers are wary of radical change.
Shell reports profits of £32.2 billion, prompting calls for higher taxes on energy companies, while the IMF warns Australia to raise taxes to sustain public spending.
Governments now have the final OECD guidance on how to implement the 15% global minimum corporate tax rate.
The Indian company, which is contesting the bill, has a family connection to UK Prime Minister Rishi Sunak – whose government has just been hit by a tax scandal.
Developments included calls for tax reform in Malaysia and the US, concerns about the level of the VAT threshold in the UK, Ukraine’s preparations for EU accession, and more.
A steady stream of countries has announced steps towards implementing pillar two, but Korea has got there first. Ralph Cunningham finds out what tax executives should do next.
The BEPS Monitoring Group has found a rare point of agreement with business bodies advocating an EU-wide one-stop-shop for compliance under BEFIT.
Former PwC partner Peter-John Collins has been banned from serving as a tax agent in Australia, while Brazil reports its best-ever year of tax collection on record.