Germany: Tax Court confirms favourable tax treatment of dividends under tax group rules

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Germany: Tax Court confirms favourable tax treatment of dividends under tax group rules

linn.jpg

braun.jpg

Alexander Linn


Thorsten Braun

Germany's Federal Tax Court (BFH) issued a decision (I R 39/14) on December 17 2014 in which it confirmed the decision of the lower court of Muenster on the trade tax treatment of dividends distributed by a non-resident subsidiary to its German parent company that is a controlled entity in a German tax group. The lower court held that the dividends are fully exempt from trade tax and that German tax law does not provide for an add-back of 5% of the dividend income for trade tax purposes in tax groups. Under German law, dividends received by German companies from their German and foreign subsidiaries generally benefit from a 95% tax exemption if certain holding and substance requirements are met. As such, only 5% of the dividends are deemed non-deductible business expenses subject to taxation for corporate income tax and trade tax purposes.

Under the tax group rules, the income of the controlled entity is attributed to the controlling entity: for corporate income tax purposes, the 95% exemption for dividends is applied at the level of the controlling entity, but for trade tax purposes, a different rule provides for a full exemption at the level of the controlled entity. Since the trade tax income attributed to the controlled entity does not include any dividend income, there is no basis for applying the provision that adds back 5% of the dividend income as deemed nondeductible business expenses at the level of the controlling entity. According to the BFH, adding back 5% of the dividends at the level of the controlling entity would contradict the language of the statute.

The decision may seem surprising because it treats dividends distributed to a controlled entity within a German group differently from dividends distributed directly to the controlling entity in the group without an adequate reason. It should be noted that on May 8 2015, the upper house of the German parliament launched an initiative to codify the position of the tax authorities on the trade tax treatment of dividends distributed by a non-resident subsidiary to its German parent company that is a controlled company in a German tax group so that such dividends would only be 95% exempt. If this initiative becomes legislation, the favourable taxation of dividends in tax groups would come to an end.

Alexander Linn (allinn@deloitte.de) and Thorsten Braun (tbraun@deloitte.de)

Deloitte

Tel: +49 89 29036 8558 and +49 69 75695 6444

Website: www.deloitte.com/de

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

The levies extended beyond the president’s ‘legitimate reach’, the Supreme Court ruled
While Brazil’s consumption tax overhaul led to a short-term spike in tax advisory demand, we are now in a period of ‘normalisation’ marked by decreased recruitment
The expanded firm will comprise roughly 8,500 employees, including 550 partners; in other news, Paul Hastings and Macfarlanes made senior tax hires
Meanwhile, one expert highlights the importance of separating Venezuela’s tax authority from direct political control after ‘lost decades and isolation’
With PMK 108, Indonesia has upgraded its tax transparency regime for the digital era, focusing on data quality, governance, and cross border exchange rather than expanding regulatory reach
In a popular LinkedIn post, Jeremie Beitel encouraged firms to invest in junior talent even if it doesn’t lead to their loyalty, though recruiters offered ITR a mixed assessment
Advisers who do not register for the new regime in time could be prevented from interacting with HMRC, the tax authority said
Valid pillar two objectives are still intact after the side-by-side agreement, but whether the framework is now settled is ‘a $64,000 question’, Morrison Foerster’s tax chair told ITR
Ian Halligan previously led Baker Tilly’s international tax services in the US
Exclusive ITR data emphasises that DEI does not affect in-house buying decisions – and it’s nothing to do with the US president
Gift this article