Canada: Welcome withholding relief for foreign employers with frequent business travelers to Canada

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Canada: Welcome withholding relief for foreign employers with frequent business travelers to Canada

jamal.jpg

maclagan.jpg

Soraya Jamal


Bill Maclagan

Canada's 2015 Budget contains relieving measures to reduce withholding tax obligations for non-resident employers with frequent business travelers to Canada. The relieving measures are expected to alleviate the administrative burden imposed on non-resident employers that have short term non-resident employees working in Canada. Generally, a non-resident is subject to Canadian tax on employment income earned in Canada, subject to treaty relief. A non-resident employer is required to make Canadian employment payroll withholdings on remuneration paid to an employee who works in Canada, even if that employee is exempt from Canadian tax under an applicable treaty. An employer is only relieved from such withholding obligations where a treaty-based waiver is obtained from the Canada Revenue Agency (CRA). Such waivers are available only in limited circumstances, must be obtained separately for each employee, and have proved to have limited utility in practice.

Budget 2015 proposes an exception to the withholding obligations imposed on a qualifying non-resident employer on payments made to a non-resident employee that is: (i) exempt from Canadian income tax under a tax treaty; and (ii) not in Canada for 90 or more days in any 12 month period that includes the time of payment. A qualifying non-resident employer must be resident in a country with which Canada has a tax treaty and must not carry on business through a Canadian permanent establishment (as defined by regulation, as opposed to the applicable treaty). Additionally, a qualifying non-resident employer must be certified by the Minister of National Revenue at the time the payment is made. To become certified, an employer must file a prescribed form certifying certain conditions (all of which are not known yet). Special rules will apply to employers that are partnerships.

Where the foregoing conditions are satisfied, a non-resident employer will be exempt from Canadian payroll withholding and remittance requirements. However, the employer must continue with its reporting requirements for such payments (for example, filing T4 returns). The extent to which non-resident employers find the new exemption helpful remains to be seen. As is now proposed, the decision to certify and qualify a non-resident employer is discretionary, even if all the required conditions are met. Also, the application for certification will serve to notify CRA about a non-resident's presence in Canada, affording CRA an opportunity in advance to take a position on whether the non-resident is carrying on business in Canada, or doing so through a Canadian permanent establishment. The proposed withholding relief will apply in respect of payments made after 2015.

Soraya Jamal (soraya.jamal@blakes.com) andBill Maclagan (bill.maclagan@blakes.com)

Blake, Cassels & Graydon

Tel: +1 604 631 3300

Fax: +1 604 631 3309

Website: www.blakes.com

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

The threat of 50% tariffs on Brazilian goods coincides with new Brazilian legal powers to adopt retaliatory economic measures, local experts tell ITR
The country’s chancellor appears to have backtracked from previous pillar two scepticism; in other news, Donald Trump threatened Russia with 100% tariffs
In its latest G20 update, the OECD also revealed tense discussions with the US where the ‘significant threat’ of Section 899 was highlighted
The tax agency has increased compliance yield from wealthy individuals but cannot identify how much tax is paid by UK billionaires, the committee also claimed
Saffery cautioned that documentation requirements in new government proposals must be limited if medium-sized companies are not exempted from TP
The global minimum tax deal is not viable without US participation, Friedrich Merz has argued
Section 899 of the ‘one big beautiful’ bill would have spelled disaster for many international investors into the US, but following its shelving, attention turns to the fate of the OECD’s pillars
DLA Piper’s co-head of tax for the US and Latin America tells ITR about her fervent belief in equal access to the law, loving yoga, and paternal inspirations
Tax expert Craig Hillier agrees with the comparison of pillar two to using a sledgehammer to crack a nut
The amount is reported to be up 57% from the £5.6bn that the UK tax agency believes was underpaid in the previous year
Gift this article