International Tax Review is part of the Delinian Group, Delinian Limited, 8 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX, Registered in England & Wales, Company number 00954730
Copyright © Delinian Limited and its affiliated companies 2023

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Australia: Hockey announces 2015-2016 Budget

mccormack.jpg

Jock McCormack

The Australian Government released a measured but significant 2015-2016 Federal Budget on May 12 2015. The three main tax changes include a focus on multinational tax avoidance by introducing new targeted non-resident anti-avoidance measures and penalties, changing the goods and services tax (GST) to apply to intangible supplies made by non-residents (including digital content) and tax concessions for small businesses. The Budget continues the Australian Government's focus on certain foreign-based multinationals, after the Australian Senate's inquiry focussed on the Australian tax positions of leading global e-commerce companies.

As a significant integrity measure to protect Australia's revenue base, draft legislation has been released outlining anti-avoidance rules combatting multinational tax avoidance.

Under the proposed section 177DA of Part IVA of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1936, tax benefits will be cancelled in respect of schemes that satisfy all of the following requirements:

Under, or in connection with, the scheme

  • goods or services are provided by a non-resident to an Australian resident who is not an associate of the non-resident;

  • income derived by the non-resident from the supply is not attributable to an Australian permanent establishment (PE);

  • activities are undertaken in Australia by an Australian resident, or through an Australian PE of an associate of the non-resident or who is commercially dependent on the non-resident, in connection with the supply;

Scheme designed to avoid PE income

  • it would be reasonable to conclude that the scheme is designed to avoid the non-resident deriving income attributable to an Australian PE;

Double principal purpose test

  • a person or persons who entered into or carried out the scheme did so for a principal (as opposed to a sole or dominant) purpose of enabling a taxpayer to obtain an Australian tax benefit (that is, an Australian income tax saving) and to reduce foreign taxes or secure a saving from other Australian taxes (for example, GST);

Global revenue threshold

  • annual global revenue of the non-resident in the relevant income year exceeds $1 billion; and

No or low corporate tax jurisdiction

  • the non-resident is connected with a no or low corporate tax jurisdiction.

Other measures to tighten the rules for multinationals include adopting stronger penalties for groups that enter into tax avoidance measures related to profit shifting, and applying new transfer pricing documentation standards from January 1 2016.

The Budget confirms the GST rules are to be extended to the importations of digital products and services. This so called 'Netflix' tax is designed to ensure that non-resident suppliers of such content pay GST, thereby levelling the playing field for Australian suppliers already subject to GST. This measure is consistent with the OECD's guidelines on this subject, but under Australia's laws will require the approval of all states and territories to be enacted.

Jock McCormack (jock.mccormack@dlapiper.com)

DLA Piper

Tel: +61 2 9286 8253

Website: www.dlapiper.com

more across site & bottom lb ros

More from across our site

Two months since EU political agreement on pillar two and few member states have made progress on new national laws, but the arrival of OECD technical guidance should quicken the pace. Ralph Cunningham reports.
It’s one of the great ironies of recent history that a populist Republican may have helped make international tax policy more progressive.
Lawmakers have up to 120 days to decide the future of Brazil’s unique transfer pricing rules, but many taxpayers are wary of radical change.
Shell reports profits of £32.2 billion, prompting calls for higher taxes on energy companies, while the IMF warns Australia to raise taxes to sustain public spending.
Governments now have the final OECD guidance on how to implement the 15% global minimum corporate tax rate.
The Indian company, which is contesting the bill, has a family connection to UK Prime Minister Rishi Sunak – whose government has just been hit by a tax scandal.
Developments included calls for tax reform in Malaysia and the US, concerns about the level of the VAT threshold in the UK, Ukraine’s preparations for EU accession, and more.
A steady stream of countries has announced steps towards implementing pillar two, but Korea has got there first. Ralph Cunningham finds out what tax executives should do next.
The BEPS Monitoring Group has found a rare point of agreement with business bodies advocating an EU-wide one-stop-shop for compliance under BEFIT.
Former PwC partner Peter-John Collins has been banned from serving as a tax agent in Australia, while Brazil reports its best-ever year of tax collection on record.