Switzerland: Swiss CTR III - Latest draft legislation issued by the Federal Council
International Tax Review is part of the Delinian Group, Delinian Limited, 4 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX, Registered in England & Wales, Company number 00954730
Copyright © Delinian Limited and its affiliated companies 2024

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Switzerland: Swiss CTR III - Latest draft legislation issued by the Federal Council

zulauf.jpg

weder.jpg

Rene Zulauf


Diego Weder

Overall the draft legislation (released after public consultation) for Switzerland's Corporate Tax Reform III (CTR III) remains very attractive, in particular given the following favourable developments as compared to the original proposal:

  • The proposed introduction of a capital gains tax for individuals was dropped;

  • The draft legislation will newly introduce some sort of R&D incentives, which were not in the original proposal, in addition to the patent box regime;

  • The so-called step up for tax purposes that would essentially lead to a grandfathering of the effective tax rates of existing cantonal tax regimes that sunset as part of the tax reform presumably in 2019 or 2020, for many years should now be structured in such a way as also to provide a financial statement benefit, that is, for US GAAP and IFRS purposes, not just for cash tax purposes; and

  • The planned abolition of the 1% capital issuance tax on equity contributions was confirmed.

The proposed peripheral measures that were dropped, such as the change of the participation regime, were not necessarily favourable to the taxpayer and did not find enough support.

The one negative development is that the notional interest deduction (NID) on equity was dropped. Without this NID regime Switzerland would no longer be attractive for financing activities. Accordingly, a lobbying effort can be expected to bring this regime back into the legislation.

The main replacement measures for the tax regimes that sunset in 2019 or 2020, depending on the time needed for the legislative process, are:

  • Step-up for tax purposes;

  • Patent box; and

  • General tax rate reduction.

Although a public vote on the legislation by the Swiss voters is likely, we are confident that the legislation would pass such a referendum.

Rene Zulauf (rzulauf@deloitte.ch) and Diego Weder (diweder@deloitte.com)

Deloitte

Tel: +41 58 279 6359 and +1 917 573 6783

Website: www.deloitte.ch

more across site & bottom lb ros

More from across our site

Experts from TP tech provider Aibidia also warned ITR that companies ignoring pillar two is a ‘huge issue’ and a ‘red flag’
Hanno Berger was originally handed an eight-year sentence over an estimated $11 billion tax fraud; while in other news, France calls for minimum tax on the super-rich
Amount B is meant to increase simplicity and reduce uncertainty, but US TP specialists claim it may lead to controversy
Tax Foundation economist Alan Cole also signalled that pillar two has a 'considerable chance' of failing
The Labour Party is working hard to convince business that it will bring stability to tax policy if it wins the next UK general election. But it will be impossible to avoid creating winners and losers
Burrowes had initially been parachuted into the role last summer to navigate the fallout from the firm’s tax leaks scandal
Barbara Voskamp is bullish on hiring local talent to boost DLA Piper’s Singapore practice, and argues that ‘big four’ accountants suffer from a stifled creativity
Chris Jordan also said that nations have a duty to scrutinise the partnership structures of major firms, while, in other news, a number of tax teams expanded their benches
KPMG has exclusive access to the tool for three years in the UK, giving it an edge over ‘big four’ rivals
But the US tax agency’s advice is consistent with OECD guidance and shouldn’t surprise anyone, other experts tell ITR
Gift this article