International Tax Review is part of the Delinian Group, Delinian Limited, 8 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX, Registered in England & Wales, Company number 00954730
Copyright © Delinian Limited and its affiliated companies 2023

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Switzerland: Swiss CTR III - Latest draft legislation issued by the Federal Council

zulauf.jpg

weder.jpg

Rene Zulauf


Diego Weder

Overall the draft legislation (released after public consultation) for Switzerland's Corporate Tax Reform III (CTR III) remains very attractive, in particular given the following favourable developments as compared to the original proposal:

  • The proposed introduction of a capital gains tax for individuals was dropped;

  • The draft legislation will newly introduce some sort of R&D incentives, which were not in the original proposal, in addition to the patent box regime;

  • The so-called step up for tax purposes that would essentially lead to a grandfathering of the effective tax rates of existing cantonal tax regimes that sunset as part of the tax reform presumably in 2019 or 2020, for many years should now be structured in such a way as also to provide a financial statement benefit, that is, for US GAAP and IFRS purposes, not just for cash tax purposes; and

  • The planned abolition of the 1% capital issuance tax on equity contributions was confirmed.

The proposed peripheral measures that were dropped, such as the change of the participation regime, were not necessarily favourable to the taxpayer and did not find enough support.

The one negative development is that the notional interest deduction (NID) on equity was dropped. Without this NID regime Switzerland would no longer be attractive for financing activities. Accordingly, a lobbying effort can be expected to bring this regime back into the legislation.

The main replacement measures for the tax regimes that sunset in 2019 or 2020, depending on the time needed for the legislative process, are:

  • Step-up for tax purposes;

  • Patent box; and

  • General tax rate reduction.

Although a public vote on the legislation by the Swiss voters is likely, we are confident that the legislation would pass such a referendum.

Rene Zulauf (rzulauf@deloitte.ch) and Diego Weder (diweder@deloitte.com)

Deloitte

Tel: +41 58 279 6359 and +1 917 573 6783

Website: www.deloitte.ch

more across site & bottom lb ros

More from across our site

Two months since EU political agreement on pillar two and few member states have made progress on new national laws, but the arrival of OECD technical guidance should quicken the pace. Ralph Cunningham reports.
It’s one of the great ironies of recent history that a populist Republican may have helped make international tax policy more progressive.
Lawmakers have up to 120 days to decide the future of Brazil’s unique transfer pricing rules, but many taxpayers are wary of radical change.
Shell reports profits of £32.2 billion, prompting calls for higher taxes on energy companies, while the IMF warns Australia to raise taxes to sustain public spending.
Governments now have the final OECD guidance on how to implement the 15% global minimum corporate tax rate.
The Indian company, which is contesting the bill, has a family connection to UK Prime Minister Rishi Sunak – whose government has just been hit by a tax scandal.
Developments included calls for tax reform in Malaysia and the US, concerns about the level of the VAT threshold in the UK, Ukraine’s preparations for EU accession, and more.
A steady stream of countries has announced steps towards implementing pillar two, but Korea has got there first. Ralph Cunningham finds out what tax executives should do next.
The BEPS Monitoring Group has found a rare point of agreement with business bodies advocating an EU-wide one-stop-shop for compliance under BEFIT.
Former PwC partner Peter-John Collins has been banned from serving as a tax agent in Australia, while Brazil reports its best-ever year of tax collection on record.