International Tax Review is part of the Delinian Group, Delinian Limited, 8 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX, Registered in England & Wales, Company number 00954730
Copyright © Delinian Limited and its affiliated companies 2023

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Austrian group taxation – an overview

austria mountains

Companies are, by law, separate and independent entities. Any profit derived by a corporation is subject to Austrian corporate income tax at a flat rate of 25% regardless of whether the profit is distributed to shareholders or retained.

However, if an Austrian corporation holds a (direct or indirect through another group member or a partnership) participation of more than 50% of the capital and the majority of the voting rights in a domestic or foreign corporation, a tax group may be established.

A non-resident company can also form a tax group, provided that it is either listed in the annex of the EU Parent-Subsidiary Directive or is comparable to a resident company and has its place of management in the European Economic Area. In addition, the non-resident company needs to be registered in the commercial register with an Austrian branch and the shares in the group members have to be attributable to that Austrian branch.

All Austrian corporations as well as comparable foreign corporations which are resident in the EU or in a state which has concluded an agreement for Exchange of Information and Mutual Assistance in the Collection of Taxes with Austria, theoretically qualify as a group member. However, only “first-tier” foreign subsidiaries may be included into the group, meaning that the required share exceeding 50% in a foreign group member needs to be held by one or more Austrian group members.

As a consequence of group taxation, the group members’ total profits and losses are attributed to the group parent. The degree of participation of the latter is irrelevant. The total attribution of profits and losses also takes place when the percentage of participation does not amount to 100%. An exception exists for foreign group members: only losses of foreign group members may be deducted from the taxable income of the group in portion of the amount of the direct shareholding of the group in the foreign entity. However, such losses are recaptured and taxed in Austria in subsequent years if and to the extent they can be offset against profits of the foreign entity under its domestic tax regime or if the foreign entity drops out of the group. Forming a tax group is particularly useful when at least one of the group companies incurs a loss in the relevant year.

The group needs to be existent for a period of at least three years. If the tax group is terminated earlier, all benefits from the group taxation will be lost and each member of the group will be taxed as a separate entity with retroactive effect. Providing that all requirements are fulfilled, the group leader may opt for group taxation simply by filing an application form with the tax authorities. Furthermore it has to be mentioned that binding rulings are available in group taxation issues (costs differ between €1,500  and €20.000 ($5,500 and $22,000) depending on the turnover of the requesting taxpayer).

This article was prepared by WTS Austria, member of WTS Global.

Kerstin Weber, certified tax advisor

00431 24 266 17

Jürgen Reinold

00431 24 266 41

more across site & bottom lb ros

More from across our site

COVID-19 and an overworked HMRC may have created the ‘perfect storm’ for reduced prosecutions, according to tax professionals.
Participants in the consultation on the UN secretary-general’s report into international tax cooperation are divided – some believe UN-led structures are the way forward, while others want to improve existing ones. Ralph Cunningham reports.
The German government unveils plans to implement pillar two, while EY is reportedly still divided over ‘Project Everest’.
With the M&A market booming, ITR has partnered with correspondents from firms around the globe to provide a guide to the deal structures being employed and tax authorities' responses.
Xing Hu, partner at Hui Ye Law Firm in Shanghai, looks at the implications of the US Uyghur Forced Labor Protection Act for TP comparability analysis of China.
Karl Berlin talks to Josh White about meeting the Fair Tax standard, the changing burden of country-by-country reporting, and how windfall taxes may hit renewable energy.
Sandy Markwick, head of the Tax Director Network (TDN) at Winmark, looks at the challenges of global mobility for tax management.
Taxpayers should look beyond the headline criteria of the simplification regime to ensure that their arrangements meet the arm’s-length standard, say Alejandro Ces and Mark Seddon of the EY New Zealand transfer pricing team.
In a recent webinar hosted by law firms Greenberg Traurig and Clayton Utz, officials at the IRS and ATO outlined their visions for 2023.
The Asia-Pacific awards research cycle has now begun – don’t miss on this opportunity be recognised in 2023