Croatia: Croatian transfer pricing regulations

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Croatia: Croatian transfer pricing regulations

intl-updates-small.jpg

Although Croatia is not an OECD member country, the provisions of the relevant Croatian tax legislation are generally based on the OECD Transfer Pricing (TP) Guidelines.

taci.jpg
sagianni.jpg

Afrodita Taci

Anastasia Sagianni

TP rules in Croatia are prescribed by Article 13 of the Corporate Income Tax (CIT) Act (the Act) and by Article 40 of the CIT Bylaw (the Regulation). Under these rules, the prices or conditions of transactions between related parties must be based on the arm's length principle.

Apart from cross-border transactions, transactions between resident associated entities also fall under the TP rules if one of the parties:

  • Has a privileged tax status;

  • Is subject to profit tax at a rate lower than the stipulated rates;

  • Is exempt from the payment of profits tax; or

  • Is entitled to carry forward the tax loss from previous tax periods in the given tax period.

Related parties

The definition of associated parties is very broad and includes persons that directly or indirectly participate in the management, control, or capital of the other party. Unlike some other jurisdictions, the Croatian CIT Law does not include any threshold percentage for the definition of associated entities.

TP methods and data

The Act and the Regulation prescribe the use of different methods for determining whether the prices are agreed at arm's-length. Generally, the same methods as those prescribed by the OECD are applicable, including:

  • The comparable uncontrolled price (CUP) method;

  • The resale price method (RPM);

  • The cost plus method (CPM);

  • The transactional net margin method (TNMM); or

  • The profit split method (PSM).

It is worth noting that internal data and traditional methods are preferred by Croatian tax authorities.

TP audits and penalties

There is no specific deadline for preparing TP documentation, but the law requires that the documents are available and submitted to the tax authorities upon request in a tax audit. Taxpayers should have the documents available at the same time as submitting the annual tax return, which happens at the end of the fourth month from the taxpayer's year end (April 30 for the majority of companies).

Failure to have the correct documents ready

There are no special TP audit procedures in Croatia, but the tax authority has published the "Guidebook for Surveillance of Transfer Pricing" that was designed for internal use, but is now also available to all taxpayers.

The number of audits relating to TP have increased in the past few years with tax authorities exhibiting an aggressive approach to large management fee payments or other intra-group payments that suggest a high TP risk.

There are also no specific TP penalties, but standard fines can be as high as HRK 200,000 (€29,000) for a company and up to HRK 20,000 for the responsible individual within the company. Penalty interest would also be calculated from the date when the tax was due until the date when it is paid. For the most severe tax violations, the penalty can reach HRK 500,000 for the legal entity.

Statute of limitation period

The general statute of limitation expires at the end of the third year following the year in which a tax return should have been filed. However, the general statute of limitation may be extended and recommence after each intervention by the tax authority with respect to a filed tax return. The absolute statute of limitation is six years. However, attention should be paid on relevant amendments regarding the extension of the limitation period.

Afrodita Taci (afrodita.taci@eurofast.eu) and Anastasia Sagianni (anastasia.sagianni@eurofast.eu)

Eurofast Croatia

Tel: +385 98 525 758

Website: www.eurofast.eu

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

APAs should provide a pragmatic means to agree to an arm's-length outcome for an Australian entity and for the ATO, the tax authority said
Overall revenues and average profit per partner also increased in the UK, the ‘big four’ firm revealed
Increasingly complex reporting requirements contributed towards the firm’s growth in tax, it said
Sector-specific business taxes, private equity tax treatment reform and changes to the taxation of non-residents are all on the cards for the UK, authors from Herbert Smith Freehills Kramer predict
The UK’s Labour government has an unpopular prime minister, an unpopular chancellor and not a lot of good options as it prepares to deliver its autumn Budget
Awards
The firms picked up five major awards between them at a gala ceremony held at New York’s prestigious Metropolitan Club
The streaming company’s operating income was $400m below expectations following the dispute; in other news, the OECD has released updates for 25 TP country profiles
Software company Oracle has won the right to have its A$250m dispute with the ATO stayed, paving the way for a mutual agreement procedure
If the US doesn't participate in pillar two then global consensus on the project can’t be a reality, tax academic René Matteotti also suggests
If it gets pillar two right, India may be the ideal country that finds a balance between its global commitments and its national interests, Sameer Sharma argues
Gift this article