International Tax Review is part of the Delinian Group, Delinian Limited, 8 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX, Registered in England & Wales, Company number 00954730
Copyright © Delinian Limited and its affiliated companies 2023

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Spain: New tax regime applicable to capital gains due to change of residence


One of the most significant changes introduced in the latest reform of the Spanish Personal Income Tax Law (PIT Law) was the establishment of an exit tax, which is levied on certain unrealised capital gains on shares and other financial assets when a taxpayer transfers his residence outside Spain.


Eduardo Gómez de Salazar

Antonio López López

However, this is not an original provision in Spanish tax law because it already exists, or has existed, in the laws of some other EU nations and OECD member countries, which provide for 'exit taxes'.

Further, this is not the first time that the PIT Law has changed the usual tax treatment of certain income types as a result of a change of tax residence. This is something that already happens, so to speak, when a Spanish individual changes his tax residence to a territory classed as a tax haven, or with the inclusion in the taxable income of income that has not yet been taxed as a result of a change of tax residence.

The changes to the Spanish tax regime in the PIT Law entered into effect on January 1 2015. Under the rules, when a personal income taxpayer, who has maintained a Spanish tax status for 10 of the last 15 tax periods, transfers their residence to a new state, they must file a final Spanish tax for the last tax period they are resident in Spain. If the taxpayer owns shares or units in entities (including collective investment undertakings) the market value of which exceeds €4 million ($4.5 million) (or €1 million if they own more than 25% of the entity), they must include the positive difference between the market value of those shares or units on the due date of the last tax period for which they must file a Spanish tax return and the acquisition cost of those shares or units.

If the taxpayer changes their residence for work reasons to a country that is not considered a tax haven, or if the host country is a jurisdiction with which Spain has signed a tax treaty with an exchange of information provision, they may request a deferral of the tax debt by providing guarantees and bearing any late payment interest on the debt.

If the taxpayer relocates to an EU country, or a country in the European Economic Area (EEA) with an effective exchange of information, they will not have to pay or defer the exit tax as a result of this change of residence. The tax will only have to be paid, if within the 10 years following the last year the taxpayer was resident in Spain, one of the following circumstances arises:

  • The taxpayer transfers the shares or units inter vivos;

  • The taxpayer forfeits their status as a resident in the EU or EEA; or

  • The taxpayer breaches the regulatory reporting requirements.

Since its approval, this tax regime has been the subject of myriad comments and critiques relating to such questions as the valuation methods applied to the capital gains, or the regime's justification and validity under EU law.

On the one hand, there has been talk of extending the effects of the judgments issued by the European Court of Justice in relation to exit taxes approved by other EU member states and the tax sovereignty conflicts that may arise between those states and EU law with respect, among other issues, to the freedom of establishment or the double taxation that these kinds of gains may suffer, since there are no mechanisms that eliminate this type of double taxation in Spanish law or in the tax treaties yet.

It has also been argued that although it is aimed at taxing large fortunes, in practice it has entailed a limitation for entrepreneurs since it affects the creation, competiveness and growth of Spanish start-ups when they seek to expand their businesses abroad.

Recently, new uncertainty has arisen as to the future application of this regime in cases of transfers of tax residence to the UK, particularly since the Brexit vote, as it is unclear whether the UK will be a member of the EEA or not. This may lead to significant changes in the context of the exit tax for taxpayers who transfer their tax residence to the UK.

In light of the above, taxpayers who may be changing their tax residence should seek professional advice that examines whether this exit tax will be triggered and, if so, the alternatives available to at least defer it.

Eduardo Gómez de Salazar ( and Antonio López López (

Garrigues, Madrid


more across site & bottom lb ros

More from across our site

David Pickstone and Anastasia Nourescu of Stewarts review the facts and implications of Ørsted’s appeal at the Upper Tribunal.
The Internal Revenue Service will lose the funding as part of the US debt limit deal, while Amazon UK reaps the benefits of the 130% ‘super-deduction’.
The European Commission wanted to make an example of US companies like Apple, but its crusade against ‘sweetheart’ tax rulings may be derailed at the CJEU.
The OECD has announced that a TP training programme is about to conclude in West Africa, a region that has been plagued by mispricing activities for a number of years.
Richard Murphy and Andrew Baker make the case for tax transparency as a public good and how key principles should lead to a better tax system.
‘Go on leave, effective immediately’, PwC has told nine partners in the latest development in the firm’s ongoing tax scandal.
The forum heard that VAT professionals are struggling under new pressures to validate transactions and catch fraud, responsibilities that they say should lie with governments.
The working paper suggested a new framework for boosting effective carbon rates and reducing the inconsistency of climate policy.
UAE firm Virtuzone launches ‘TaxGPT’, claiming it is the first AI-powered tax tool, while the Australian police faces claims of a conflict of interest over its PwC audit contract.
The US technology company is defending its past Irish tax arrangements at the CJEU in a final showdown that could have major political repercussions.