Italy: Advance ruling for new investments in light of the recent clarifications provided by tax authorities

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement


Italy: Advance ruling for new investments in light of the recent clarifications provided by tax authorities

vannucci.jpg
massimiano.jpg

Michele Vannucci

Aurelio Massimiano

Circular No. 25/E, issued by the Italian tax authorities, has provided further clarifications on the advance ruling on new investments introduced by Legislative Decree No. 147 provided on September 14 2015, confirming its remarkable appeal for Italian and foreign investors.

Firstly, the Circular (which was issued on June 1 2016) has provided an extensive interpretation of the notion of eligible investors that includes individuals, partnerships, companies, trusts or other entities carrying on business activities.

Moreover, the Circular specified that individuals and other entities which do not carry on business activities may also apply for the new ruling provided that the investment implies the carrying out of a business activity or results in the participation in the equity of an Italian business entity (i.e. via asset deals or share deals). Furthermore, the Circular expressly includes collective investment vehicles subject to surveillance as well as groups of companies including, among the others, joint ventures, consortia and business districts.

It is also worth noting that the Circular has expressively extended the notion of eligible investment to leveraged buy-out acquisitions and has provided further clarifications relevant to the investment requirements. In particular, as regards the value of the investment, the Circular has clarified that the threshold of €30 million may be met in more than one year. Whereas, as regards the requirement that the investment must have a significant and long-lasting impact on employment levels, the Circular has specified that the requirement is met also where the investment secures already existing job positions threatened by financial crisis.

The appeal of the new ruling also relates to its comprehensive nature. By means of a single advance ruling, taxpayers may now obtain certainty on the tax treatment applicable to investment plans, on the absence of any abusive behaviors, on the fulfilment of requirements needed to exclude the application of anti-avoidance provisions or on the eligibility for specific tax regimes.

In this regard, the Circular clarified that taxpayers may also seek confirmation that the investment does not constitute a permanent establishment, both for direct tax and VAT purposes. Transfer pricing is not included in the scope of the new ruling, meaning taxpayers must apply using the ordinary APA procedure.

In terms of procedural rules, the tax authorities shall answer to the ruling request within 120 days as from its submission or, should additional documentation is requested, within 90 days as from such documentation is collected. If no answer is given within such deadlines, the interpretation proposed by the taxpayer is deemed to be accepted.

Furthermore, the ruling outcomes are binding on the tax authorities and may not be amended (barring certain conditions). Finally, taxpayers conforming to the ruling outcomes may also take advantage of the cooperative compliance regime irrespective of their turnover threshold.

Michele Vannucci (m.vannucci@maisto.it) and Aurelio Massimiano (a.massimiano@maisto.it)

Maisto e Associati

Tel: +39 02 776931

Fax: +39 02 77693300

Website: www.maisto.it

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

It was also a memorable night for Galicia, KPMG, Skadden and Pinheiro Neto, all of which scooped major awards at a gala ceremony in New York
The former Deloitte UK CEO earned a 45% raise in a year when 1,000 staff reportedly lost their jobs – and the pay gap is only getting bigger
In a seminal development for big law, the 95-year-old firm is set to cease operations after a series of high-profile partner departures
UK Chancellor John Healey extended a VAT cut, suspended tariffs, increased a bank surcharge and vowed to increase funding for HMRC
Kristine Riisberg warned that TP decisions can determine top-up tax exposure under pillar two, while global consensus over the rules remains unsettled
Both Germany’s NIS2 and the EU AI Act now determine whether a tax function can meet its obligations – and both can make management personally accountable
Originators, loan purchasers and securitisation vehicles may need to revisit servicing agreements and pricing after a key judgment narrowed the VAT credit management exemption
Opening doors for existing talent within Baker McKenzie and a desire for enhanced legal capabilities informed Ricardo Perera’s switch from KPMG
Boaz Goren’s move to the upstart PE-backed firm takes the number of senior UK tax professionals who have left EY this year to 13
The allegations against Deloitte Cyprus raise uncomfortable questions about how far the big four can distance themselves from misconduct at member firms
Gift this article