Germany: Draft tax law includes BEPS measures including CbCR requirements

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Germany: Draft tax law includes BEPS measures including CbCR requirements

Linn-Alexander
Braun-Thorsten-100

Alexander Linn

Thorsten Braun

Germany's Ministry of Finance has issued a draft tax law including measures based on the recommendations in the final reports issued under the OECD base erosion and profit shifting (BEPS) initiative and the amendments to the EU administrative cooperation directive to introduce country-by-country reporting (CbCR).

The draft law, issued on June 1 2016, also includes certain non-BEPS-related measures in response to judicial developments in cases where Germany's Federal Tax Court (BFH) decision went against the views of the tax authorities.

Proposed changes include:

  • CbCR: The proposed country-by-country rules would require multinational companies with consolidated group turnover of €750 million ($830 million) or more to file a country-by-country report including a 'master file' and 'local file' reporting requirement for transfer pricing documentation purposes under certain conditions.

  • Treaty override provision for the application of the arm's-length principle: In 2014, the BFH held that Germany's tax treaties can limit Germany's taxing rights based on section 1(1) of the Foreign Tax Act (FTA) if the treaty contains a provision equivalent to the associated enterprises article in the OECD model treaty and if the prices paid are at arm's-length. The draft law proposes to amend the FTA to eliminate this limitation.

  • Trade tax on income subject to controlled foreign company (CFC) rules: In 2015, the BFH held that passive income of a wholly-owned, low-taxed foreign subsidiary that is subject to the German CFC rules is not subject to German trade tax. The draft law would reverse the BFH's decision.

Another change would only allow exclusion of foreign passive income of foreign permanent establishments for trade tax purposes if the foreign permanent establishment (or partnership) is situated in the EU and has sufficient substance. This change is expected to restrict the use of certain IP structures where license income may not be subject to taxation for trade tax purposes.

The draft law includes the reestablishment of the trade tax on certain dividends distributed by a nonresident subsidiary to a German parent company that is a controlled entity in a German fiscal unity. The draft law would further clarify the application of the participation exemption for banks and financial institutions. Furthermore, the draft law includes amendments to the domestic switch-over and subject-to-tax clauses to prevent the non-taxation or the low taxation of certain items of income of a taxpayer that is subject to unlimited tax liability in Germany.

Alexander Linn (allinn@deloitte.de) and Thorsten Braun (tbraun@deloitte.de)

Deloitte

Tel: +49 89 29036 8558 and +49 69 75695 6444

Website: www.deloitte.de

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

While it’s great that the OECD is alive to multinationals’ fears of being caught in a compliance trap, the ‘common understanding’ illustrates a worrying lack of readiness
Rising demand for specialist expertise has fuelled the growth in tax partner headcounts, Cain Dwyer found; in other news, Switzerland has been urged to reconsider pillar two
An OECD report on the taxation of the digital economy is expected by the end of 2026, according to the group of nations
Trophy assets are evolving from personal indulgences to structured investments, prompting family offices to prioritise tax efficiency, governance discipline, and cross-border compliance
As demand for complex, cross-border private client counsel spikes, Patrick McCormick sees opportunity in starting from scratch
As part of an exclusive global alliance, KPMG will become one of Anthropic’s ‘preferred consultants’ for private equity
In the second part of this series, the focus shifts to how taxpayers can manage ongoing risks across the lifecycle of cross-border structures
Jurisdictions have moved to ensure that multinationals are not punished for late GIR filings due to a lack of available filing portals or exchange relationships
HMRC’s push for unified tax adviser registration won’t prevent every instance of improper conduct, but it is good for taxpayers and the UK’s reputation
Elsewhere, the UAE’s tax office has issued an update on registration penalties and two firms have been busy making lateral hires
Gift this article