Germany: Draft tax law includes BEPS measures including CbCR requirements

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Germany: Draft tax law includes BEPS measures including CbCR requirements

Linn-Alexander
Braun-Thorsten-100

Alexander Linn

Thorsten Braun

Germany's Ministry of Finance has issued a draft tax law including measures based on the recommendations in the final reports issued under the OECD base erosion and profit shifting (BEPS) initiative and the amendments to the EU administrative cooperation directive to introduce country-by-country reporting (CbCR).

The draft law, issued on June 1 2016, also includes certain non-BEPS-related measures in response to judicial developments in cases where Germany's Federal Tax Court (BFH) decision went against the views of the tax authorities.

Proposed changes include:

  • CbCR: The proposed country-by-country rules would require multinational companies with consolidated group turnover of €750 million ($830 million) or more to file a country-by-country report including a 'master file' and 'local file' reporting requirement for transfer pricing documentation purposes under certain conditions.

  • Treaty override provision for the application of the arm's-length principle: In 2014, the BFH held that Germany's tax treaties can limit Germany's taxing rights based on section 1(1) of the Foreign Tax Act (FTA) if the treaty contains a provision equivalent to the associated enterprises article in the OECD model treaty and if the prices paid are at arm's-length. The draft law proposes to amend the FTA to eliminate this limitation.

  • Trade tax on income subject to controlled foreign company (CFC) rules: In 2015, the BFH held that passive income of a wholly-owned, low-taxed foreign subsidiary that is subject to the German CFC rules is not subject to German trade tax. The draft law would reverse the BFH's decision.

Another change would only allow exclusion of foreign passive income of foreign permanent establishments for trade tax purposes if the foreign permanent establishment (or partnership) is situated in the EU and has sufficient substance. This change is expected to restrict the use of certain IP structures where license income may not be subject to taxation for trade tax purposes.

The draft law includes the reestablishment of the trade tax on certain dividends distributed by a nonresident subsidiary to a German parent company that is a controlled entity in a German fiscal unity. The draft law would further clarify the application of the participation exemption for banks and financial institutions. Furthermore, the draft law includes amendments to the domestic switch-over and subject-to-tax clauses to prevent the non-taxation or the low taxation of certain items of income of a taxpayer that is subject to unlimited tax liability in Germany.

Alexander Linn (allinn@deloitte.de) and Thorsten Braun (tbraun@deloitte.de)

Deloitte

Tel: +49 89 29036 8558 and +49 69 75695 6444

Website: www.deloitte.de

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

Landmark legal updates in India have led companies to prioritise specialised tax advisers over accountants, ITR has found
Brazil’s shift to a nationwide consumption tax is more than conceptual; it fundamentally transforms municipal revenue, enforcement, and administrative disputes
While some advisers praised the ruling’s definition of a ‘voucher’ for VAT purposes, a UK partner said the case left unanswered questions
While pillar two has been enacted on paper in Brazil, companies are encountering a range of practical compliance issues, ITR has heard
Moore, founding partner of the Chicago tax boutique which bears her name, shares her career wisdom for ITR’s new Women in Tax interview series
But partners at the firm admit that jumping ship to the US would not be as easy as some believe
Governments are rewriting tax policy for the AI era, deploying digital taxes, tailored incentives and algorithmic enforcement that redefine where value is created
Wingrove will succeed Bill Thomas, who has served in the role since 2017; in other news, Andersen unveiled a sharp increase in revenues for 2025
Partners are divided on Italy vs PDM D’s analytical depth, evidentiary standards, and what the judgment signals for future intra-group financing cases
As GCCs increasingly become strategic hubs, multinationals face heightened risks around permanent establishment and place of effective management
Gift this article