International Tax Review is part of the Delinian Group, Delinian Limited, 8 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX, Registered in England & Wales, Company number 00954730
Copyright © Delinian Limited and its affiliated companies 2023

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

India: India-Mauritius tax treaty amended

Sponsored by

logo.png
Mauritius remains a hub for inbound investments

After years of negotiations, India and Mauritius have signed a protocol which makes important changes to the over three-decades-old tax treaty between the countries.

dharawat.jpg
gangadharan.jpg

Rakesh Dharawat

Hariharan Gangadharan

After years of negotiations, India and Mauritius have signed a protocol which makes important changes to the over three-decades-old tax treaty between the countries. The treaty originally contained a provision whereby only Mauritius had the right to tax capital gains arising from the transfer of shares in Indian companies. This led to the jurisdiction becoming a hub for inbound investments into India, with several global companies setting up holding companies in Mauritius to invest in India. This exemption for capital gains is proposed to be removed in a phased manner.

It is provided that India will have the right to levy tax on gains arising from the transfer of shares acquired on or after April 1 2017. Thus, the exemption from capital gains will continue to be available for all investments made before that date. It is also provided that for shares that are acquired after April 1 2017 but sold before March 31 2019, gains will be taxable in India at a rate which is 50% of the prevailing domestic rate.

The availability of the 50% rate is made conditional upon the taxpayer complying with a newly introduced limitation of benefits (LOB) article. This LOB article restricts companies that are considered shell or conduit companies from taking advantage of the concessional rate. The protocol clarifies that a company will not be considered a shell or a conduit company if:

  • It is either listed on a recognised stock exchange of the contracting state; or

  • Its expenditure on operations in that State is equal to or more than MUR1.5 million ($42,500) or Rs2.7 million ($40,300) in the 12 months immediately before the date on which the gains arise.

This protocol will also have a direct impact on the continued availability of treaty benefits under the India-Singapore treaty. The India-Singapore treaty states that the capital gains exemption provided therein will be co-terminus with the capital gains exemption under the India-Mauritius treaty. However, given the proposed grandfathering of pre-2017 investments from Mauritius and the two-year transition period, the Indian government has indicated that there may be a need for modification to the India-Singapore treaty as well.

Incidentally, though the Indian Supreme Court upheld the legal position regarding the availability of the capital gains exemption under the India Mauritius treaty more than a decade ago in the Azadi Bachao Andolan case, claiming treaty benefits often posed significant practical difficulties. This led to litigation and uncertainty. In 2013, India also introduced a corporate-level tax on Indian companies undertaking share buybacks, which also diluted the use of the treaty somewhat. Gains on such share buybacks were earlier taxed as capital gains in the hands of the shareholder on which treaty benefits were available.

The protocol makes other changes such as: a source country tax of 7.5% on interest income, the introduction of a service PE clause; a new article dealing with taxation of fees for technical services (which are made taxable at 10% on a gross basis); and robust provisions for exchange of information and assistance in the recovery of taxes.

Rakesh Dharawat (rakesh.dharawat@dhruvaadvisors.com) and Hariharan Gangadharan (hariharan.gangadharan@dhruvaadvisors.com)

Dhruva Advisors LLP

Tel: +91 2261081000

Website: www.dhruvaadvisors.com

more across site & bottom lb ros

More from across our site

Two months since EU political agreement on pillar two and few member states have made progress on new national laws, but the arrival of OECD technical guidance should quicken the pace. Ralph Cunningham reports.
It’s one of the great ironies of recent history that a populist Republican may have helped make international tax policy more progressive.
Lawmakers have up to 120 days to decide the future of Brazil’s unique transfer pricing rules, but many taxpayers are wary of radical change.
Shell reports profits of £32.2 billion, prompting calls for higher taxes on energy companies, while the IMF warns Australia to raise taxes to sustain public spending.
Governments now have the final OECD guidance on how to implement the 15% global minimum corporate tax rate.
The Indian company, which is contesting the bill, has a family connection to UK Prime Minister Rishi Sunak – whose government has just been hit by a tax scandal.
Developments included calls for tax reform in Malaysia and the US, concerns about the level of the VAT threshold in the UK, Ukraine’s preparations for EU accession, and more.
A steady stream of countries has announced steps towards implementing pillar two, but Korea has got there first. Ralph Cunningham finds out what tax executives should do next.
The BEPS Monitoring Group has found a rare point of agreement with business bodies advocating an EU-wide one-stop-shop for compliance under BEFIT.
Former PwC partner Peter-John Collins has been banned from serving as a tax agent in Australia, while Brazil reports its best-ever year of tax collection on record.