Switzerland: Swiss House of Representatives makes the CTR III package even more attractive

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Switzerland: Swiss House of Representatives makes the CTR III package even more attractive

Kistler
Zulauf

Jacques Kistler

Rene Zulauf

The Swiss House of Representatives voted on the Swiss Corporate Tax Reform III (CTR III) on March 16 and 17. The House voted, among others, in favour of the following replacement measures to compensate for the abolition of special income tax regimes:

  • Introduction of notional interest deduction (NID) on a federal level – and at a cantonal/communal level at the discretion of the cantons;

  • Introduction of a patent box with the possibility for the cantons for a full relief;

  • Introduction of R&D super deductions extended to foreign R&D activities with a super deduction that is not limited to 150%, but is at the discretion of the cantons;

  • Tax privileged release of hidden reserves for companies transitioning out of tax privileged regimes and step up on migration of companies or activities to Switzerland;

  • Reduced annual capital tax on participations, patented IP and on intra-group loans;

  • Introduction of a tonnage tax for maritime shipping companies;

  • Limitation of the combined tax relief resulting from the release of hidden reserves when transitioning out of tax privileged regimes, the patent box, the R&D super deductions and the NID to 80%.

In turn, the abolition of the 1% capital issuance tax has been postponed for now.

The tax reform package voted for by the Swiss House of Representatives will now go back to the Swiss Senate, which proposed a somewhat more restrictive version of the tax reform package. The two parliamentary chambers will have to settle their differences in the summer 2016 session between May 30 and June 17 2016.

In addition, there may be a referendum and a national vote on the legislation. Cantonal tax laws would subsequently have to be amended, so the law would likely become effective at the earliest on January 1 2019.

Jacques Kistler (jkistler@deloitte.ch) and Rene Zulauf (rzulauf@deloitte.ch)

Deloitte

Tel: +41 58 279 6359 and +41 58 279 8164

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

The threat of 50% tariffs on Brazilian goods coincides with new Brazilian legal powers to adopt retaliatory economic measures, local experts tell ITR
The country’s chancellor appears to have backtracked from previous pillar two scepticism; in other news, Donald Trump threatened Russia with 100% tariffs
In its latest G20 update, the OECD also revealed tense discussions with the US where the ‘significant threat’ of Section 899 was highlighted
The tax agency has increased compliance yield from wealthy individuals but cannot identify how much tax is paid by UK billionaires, the committee also claimed
Saffery cautioned that documentation requirements in new government proposals must be limited if medium-sized companies are not exempted from TP
The global minimum tax deal is not viable without US participation, Friedrich Merz has argued
Section 899 of the ‘one big beautiful’ bill would have spelled disaster for many international investors into the US, but following its shelving, attention turns to the fate of the OECD’s pillars
DLA Piper’s co-head of tax for the US and Latin America tells ITR about her fervent belief in equal access to the law, loving yoga, and paternal inspirations
Tax expert Craig Hillier agrees with the comparison of pillar two to using a sledgehammer to crack a nut
The amount is reported to be up 57% from the £5.6bn that the UK tax agency believes was underpaid in the previous year
Gift this article