Chile: Voluntary income tax payment opportunity

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Chile: Voluntary income tax payment opportunity

winter.jpg
pelegri.jpg

Rodrigo Winter

Loreto Pelegri

Chile has an integrated tax system under which corporate income tax is fully creditable against final taxes such as surtax and additional withholding tax when a dividend or profit distribution occurs.

In order to maintain a record of the underlying corporate tax credit, a special registry was created to allocate the corresponding tax credit to a dividend or profit distribution. In this sense, distributions were assigned with its corresponding tax credit on a 'first in and first out' basis.

From January 1 2017 onwards this record of the corporate taxes paid will be amended and replaced by an average rate. Also, the corporate income tax on those companies subject to the partially integrated tax system will be limited only to 65% of the corporate tax paid by the company which may imply an effective 44.45% rate in certain cases.

Since the purpose of the reform package applicable from January 1 2017 is to eliminate the tax credit registry and replace it with a new registry, there was an incentive to apply for a voluntary income tax payment at a preferred rate. The rate corresponds to an average rate of the shareholders' final taxes in case of Chilean companies formed only by Chilean individuals. In case of Chilean companies formed by other companies or foreigners the rate is 32%.

Please bear in mind that this tax is payable by the company and corporate income tax paid can be used as a credit and the further distribution of the amounts is not subject to further taxes at the shareholder level.

Law N° 20.780 published in the Official Gazette on September 29 2014 provided that this opportunity could be exercised until December 31 2015. However, not that many taxpayers have exercised this option, while other restrictions also apply. The Law mentioned that the amount eligible was only the excess over the average of dividend distributions within the last three years. Also, the Law provided that in case option is exercised, dividends can be distributed free of further taxes, following the normal allocation order. Thus, in case the company had other taxable profits, they must be distributed before the tax free distribution.

On February 8 2016, Law 20.899 was published in the Official Gazette; the law extends the exercise of this option until April 2017 and also eliminates most of its restrictions. In fact, if this tax is paid, these amounts can be distributed free of final taxes and with preference over any other amounts. Also, the exercise of the option is not limited to the amounts exceeding the average of the last three years' dividend distributions.

In summary, this option is much more attractive than the former one and it seems to be a good alternative for those companies remitting dividends to either Chilean individuals or foreign companies since it may imply savings in terms of the final tax burden and also presents the opportunity for taxpayers to clean prior year registries before subjecting themselves to the new applicable regime.

Rodrigo Winter (rodrigo.winter@cl.pwc.com) and Loreto Pelegri (loreto.pelegri@cl.pwc.com)

PwC

Website: www.pwc.cl

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

The Australian Taxation Office believes the Swedish furniture company has used TP to evade paying tax it owes
Supermarket chain Morrisons is facing a £17 million ($23 million) tax bill; in other news, Donald Trump has cut proposed tariffs
The controversial deal will allow US-parented groups to be carved out from key aspects of pillar two
Awards
ITR invites tax firms, in-house teams, and tax professionals to make submissions for the 2027 World Tax rankings and the 2026 ITR Tax Awards globally
Pillar two was ‘weakened’ when it altered from a multinational convention agreement to simply national domestic law, Federico Bertocchi also argued
Imposing the tax on virtual assets is a measure that appears to have no legal, economic or statistical basis, one expert told ITR
The EU has seemingly capitulated to the US’s ‘side-by-side’ demands. This may be a win for the US, but the uncertainty has only just begun for pillar two
The £7.4m buyout marks MHA’s latest acquisition since listing on the London Stock Exchange earlier this year
ITR’s most prolific stories of the year charted public pillar two spats, the continued fallout from the PwC Australia tax leaks scandal, and a headline tax fraud trial
The climbdowns pave the way for a side-by-side deal to be concluded this week, as per the US Treasury secretary’s expectation; in other news, Taft added a 10-partner tax team
Gift this article