US Inbound: US revises treaty model

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

US Inbound: US revises treaty model

Fuller-James
Forst-David

Jim Fuller

David Forst

The US Treasury has released its revised 2016 Model Income Tax Treaty, which is the baseline text Treasury will use when it negotiates future tax treaties.

The US model income tax convention was last updated in 2006. A draft version of these new model treaty provisions was released for public comment in May 2015 (draft treaty). As a result of comments and feedback from stakeholders and interested parties, Treasury made a number of significant revisions to the proposed model treaty provisions. We will address different portions of the treaty over the next few months.

In a new provision, the Model Treaty addresses preferential regimes that some countries have implemented to attract highly mobile income by allowing resident companies to pay no or very little tax on their net income. These are called 'special tax regimes' (STRs) in the Model Treaty. When the provision applies, reduced US withholding tax under the treaty will not be permitted.

The scope of when the STR provisions in the Model Treaty can apply was narrowed from the 2015 draft treaty to cases in which the resident benefits from an STR with respect to a particular related-party interest payment, royalty payment, or guarantee fee that is within the scope of Article 21 (addressing 'Other Income'). An exception applies if the preferential regime will result in a rate reduction that is at least 15%, or 60% of the statutory company rate in the source country – whichever is lower.

The definition of STR was tightened to provide an exclusive list of the circumstances in which a statute, regulation, or administrative practice will be treated as an STR. This preferential treatment must be in the form of either a preferential rate for the income, a permanent reduction in the tax base with respect to the income (as opposed to preferences that merely defer the taxation of income for a reasonable period of time), or a preferential regime for companies that do not engage in an active business in the residence state.

Regimes that provide notional interest deductions (NIDs) with respect to equity are no longer treated as STRs. Instead, Article 11 (Interest) includes a new rule that would allow a treaty partner to tax interest in accordance with its domestic law if the interest is beneficially owned by a related person that benefits from an NID.

A country seeking to invoke the STR provisions must consult with the other country first and then notify the other country of its intention through a diplomatic note and issue a written public notification.

In response to comments on how to determine when a payee that benefits from an STR is "related to the payor" of an item of income, the 2016 Model provides that the STR provisions will only apply when the payee is a 'connected person' with respect to the payor of the income and provides a definition of that term, which generally means at least 50% relation.

The exceptions from the STR provisions for collective investment vehicles such as US regulated investment companies and US real estate investment trusts that are designed to achieve a single level of current tax (at either the entity level or the shareholder level) were clarified.

In next month's update, we will discuss other new provisions in the Model Treaty.

Jim Fuller (jpfuller@fenwick.com) and David Forst (dforst@fenwick.com)

Fenwick & West

Tel: +1 650 335 7205; +1 650 335 7274

Website: www.fenwick.com

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

In the second instalment of this two-part series, Jayne Stokes takes a practical approach to navigating the capital v revenue question for UK R&D claims for software development, and shares pointers for businesses
ITR's latest podcast considers how transformational the buyout could be in Ryan's quest for global advisory reach and analyses a recent boom in demand for private client advisory services
The event comes at an important moment for professionals dealing with practical realities related to this practice area
Germany’s dogmatic restriction of third-party investment in tax advisory firms will only serve to slow down innovation and access to justice
The Irish government has been told that it’s spending too much of its corporation tax receipts and should instead focus on running bigger surpluses; plus, the IRS is set to merge tax practitioner offices
A company risks double taxation, penalties and inquiry cost if it submits a form with anomalies under the new system, Asker Ali also tells ITR
Arindam Mitra and Robin Hart examine how aggregate TP rules clash with transaction-level customs rules, creating compliance risks and requiring granular, SKU-level pricing strategies
The scandal has come just three years after the PwC tax leaks controversy and has prompted KPMG’s Australian chief executive to resign
In the first of a two-part series on capital v revenue in R&D, Jayne Stokes explores these key concepts and where UK companies need to tread carefully
Magnus Pantzar is set to join as managing director after spending nearly a decade as EQT’s global head of tax
Gift this article