International Tax Review is part of the Delinian Group, Delinian Limited, 8 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX, Registered in England & Wales, Company number 00954730
Copyright © Delinian Limited and its affiliated companies 2023

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Italy: Italy enhances IP regime and introduces grandfathering period for trademarks


Aurelio Massimiano

Nicola Saccardo

Law No. 208 of December 28 2015 (Stability Law 2016) has further improved the Italian patent box regime, which was introduced a year earlier by the Law No. 190 of December 23 2014.

The patent box regime, based on the OECD nexus approach, is optional, irrevocable for a five-year period, renewable and provides for a 50% (30% for 2015 and 40% for 2016) exemption of the income derived from the exploitation or direct use of intellectual property (IP) and full exemption from qualifying gains on IP. Qualifying IP includes software protected by copyright, patents, trademarks, designs, processes, formulas, models and know-how that can enjoy legal protection. The regime can be opted for in relation to each single IP under a cherry-picking approach and, if the IP is directly used by the applicant, is subject to a mandatory ruling procedure.

The Stability Law 2016 has now improved the regime by providing that, if IPs are jointly exploited for the realisation of a product or process, the applicant can opt to treat such IPs as a single asset.

On February 11 2016 the Revenue Agency released statistics on the number of applications for the regime. The statistics confirm the regime's success, with 4,500 applications filed, mainly for trademarks (36%), know-how (22%) and patents (18%).

OECD recommendations have directed Italy to remove trademarks from the scope of the regime after a grandfathering period ending on June 30 2016. This implies that taxpayers can benefit from the patent box regime on trademarks for a (non-renewable) five-year period, provided that they successfully launch the application by June 30 2016. Otherwise, trademarks will not qualify. It is therefore imperative for groups to urgently consider the filing of the application.

Aurelio Massimiano ( and Nicola Saccardo (

Maisto e Associati

Tel: +39 02 776931 and +44 207 3740 299


more across site & bottom lb ros

More from across our site

David Pickstone and Anastasia Nourescu of Stewarts review the facts and implications of Ørsted’s appeal at the Upper Tribunal.
The Internal Revenue Service will lose the funding as part of the US debt limit deal, while Amazon UK reaps the benefits of the 130% ‘super-deduction’.
The European Commission wanted to make an example of US companies like Apple, but its crusade against ‘sweetheart’ tax rulings may be derailed at the CJEU.
The OECD has announced that a TP training programme is about to conclude in West Africa, a region that has been plagued by mispricing activities for a number of years.
Richard Murphy and Andrew Baker make the case for tax transparency as a public good and how key principles should lead to a better tax system.
‘Go on leave, effective immediately’, PwC has told nine partners in the latest development in the firm’s ongoing tax scandal.
The forum heard that VAT professionals are struggling under new pressures to validate transactions and catch fraud, responsibilities that they say should lie with governments.
The working paper suggested a new framework for boosting effective carbon rates and reducing the inconsistency of climate policy.
UAE firm Virtuzone launches ‘TaxGPT’, claiming it is the first AI-powered tax tool, while the Australian police faces claims of a conflict of interest over its PwC audit contract.
The US technology company is defending its past Irish tax arrangements at the CJEU in a final showdown that could have major political repercussions.