International Tax Review is part of the Delinian Group, Delinian Limited, 8 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX, Registered in England & Wales, Company number 00954730
Copyright © Delinian Limited and its affiliated companies 2023

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Brazil: Brazil issues new interpretative law on taxes covered under double tax treaties


Álvaro Pereira

Ruben Gottberg

According to the recently enacted Law 13.202/15, the social contribution on net income (CSLL, by its Portuguese acronym) falls under the scope of Brazilian double tax treaties (DTTs).

By way of background, the CSLL was introduced in the Brazilian legislation in 1989 as a contribution to finance social security, calculated upon the net accounting income after adjustments. Although it was formally conceived as a contribution, its calculation basis is quite similar to the one used by the Brazilian corporate income tax (IRPJ, by its Portuguese acronym).

With regard to tax treaty policy, the CSLL has been intermittently and randomly included in the DTTs signed by Brazil, resulting in different interpretations of the taxes covered by the treaties. In this regard, the Brazilian tax authorities and administrative courts have upheld different arguments to limit the application of the DTTs when the CSLL is not expressly mentioned, including: no express inclusion of the CSLL under DTTs signed after 1988; and no reference to 'contributions' in the scope of the DTTs, but rather to 'taxes'.

After a long dispute between taxpayers and tax authorities, the new Law 13.202/15 states that the scope of the DTTs should be interpreted as including CSLL. This change, which will apply retroactively, may have positive impacts mainly on Brazilian companies with outbound investments and activities. Such change is also applicable to treaties signed by Brazil in order to avoid double taxation on profits derived from international air and shipping transport.

Multinationals are encouraged to analyse how the inclusion of CSLL in the scope of DTTs will impact their specific structures.

Álvaro Pereira ( and Ruben Gottberg (



more across site & bottom lb ros

More from across our site

Bartosz Doroszuk of MDDP offers insights on Poland’s new tax legislation on shifted profits, as the implementation deadline looms nearer.
Four tax specialists preview the UK’s transfer pricing requirements, which come into effect on April 1.
The rise of the QDMTT will likely change how countries compete on tax and transfer pricing policy, but it may not reverse decades of falling corporate tax rates.
ITR’s latest quarterly PDF is going live today, leading on the EU’s BEFIT initiative and wider tax reforms in the bloc.
COVID-19 and an overworked HMRC may have created the ‘perfect storm’ for reduced prosecutions, according to tax professionals.
Participants in the consultation on the UN secretary-general’s report into international tax cooperation are divided – some believe UN-led structures are the way forward, while others want to improve existing ones. Ralph Cunningham reports.
The German government unveils plans to implement pillar two, while EY is reportedly still divided over ‘Project Everest’.
With the M&A market booming, ITR has partnered with correspondents from firms around the globe to provide a guide to the deal structures being employed and tax authorities' responses.
Xing Hu, partner at Hui Ye Law Firm in Shanghai, looks at the implications of the US Uyghur Forced Labor Protection Act for TP comparability analysis of China.
Karl Berlin talks to Josh White about meeting the Fair Tax standard, the changing burden of country-by-country reporting, and how windfall taxes may hit renewable energy.