Germany: German Ministry of Finance set to join case on RETT intra-group exception
International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 4 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX
Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2024

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Germany: German Ministry of Finance set to join case on RETT intra-group exception


Alexander Linn

Thorsten Braun

Germany's Federal Tax Court (BFH) has asked the German Ministry of Finance to join a pending case on the intra-group exception to the German real estate transfer tax (RETT) (case ref. II R 62/14). One of the issues raised by the BFH relates to the question of whether or not the intra-group exception has been notified to the European Commission as potential state aid.

Under the RETT intra-group exception, certain direct or indirect transfers of real estate are exempt from tax. One condition for that exception to apply is that the transaction involves one controlling company and one or more controlled entities, requiring a direct or indirect shareholding of at least 95% to exist for five years before and after the transaction. If interpreted literally, this criterion cannot be met where the transaction involves a merger (where the controlled entity disappears) or a demerger (where the controlled entity is created) because the 95% shareholding would either not survive the transaction or would not exist prior to the transaction. Due to the complexity of the rule and the inconsistency of the current administrative guidance, the BFH has asked the Ministry of Finance to join the case and to provide its view on the rule.

Also worth noting is that the BFH has raised the issue that this intra-group exception might constitute state aid according to article 107 TFEU. The BFH has asked the Ministry of Finance to confirm if the rule has been notified as potential state aid or not. This issue, which has not been discussed in German literature, shows the increased importance of state aid in the area of direct taxation, which extends far beyond the current discussion on ruling practices.

Alexander Linn ( and Thorsten Braun (


Tel: +49 89 29036 8558 and +49 69 75695 6444


more across site & bottom lb ros

More from across our site

As German clients attempt to comply with complex cross-border rules, local advisers argue that aggressive tax authorities are making life even harder
Based on surveys covering more than 25,000 in-house lawyers, the series provides insights into what law firms must score highly on when pitching to in-house counsel
The UK tax authority reportedly lost a case due to missing a deadline; in other news, Canada has approved pillar two legislation
There will always be multinationals trying to minimise tax by pushing the boundaries of their cross-border arrangements, Rob Heferen claimed
HMRC’s attempts to crack down on fraudulent tax relief claims are well-meaning, but the agency risks penalising genuinely innovative businesses, writes Katy Long of ForrestBrown
Argentina, Brazil, Mexico and South Africa are among the countries the OECD believes could benefit from the simplified TP rules
It comes despite an offshore enabler penalty existing in the UK throughout the entire period
It is extraordinary that tax advisers in the UK can offer their services without having to join a professional body. This looks like it is coming to an end, Ralph Cunningham writes
Meet the esteemed judges who are assessing the first-ever Social Impact Awards
The ‘big four’ firm has also vowed to spend more on nurturing junior talent; in other news, Blick Rothenberg has hired a pair of tax partners
Gift this article