International Tax Review is part of the Delinian Group, Delinian Limited, 8 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX, Registered in England & Wales, Company number 00954730
Copyright © Delinian Limited and its affiliated companies 2023

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Germany: German Ministry of Finance set to join case on RETT intra-group exception


Alexander Linn

Thorsten Braun

Germany's Federal Tax Court (BFH) has asked the German Ministry of Finance to join a pending case on the intra-group exception to the German real estate transfer tax (RETT) (case ref. II R 62/14). One of the issues raised by the BFH relates to the question of whether or not the intra-group exception has been notified to the European Commission as potential state aid.

Under the RETT intra-group exception, certain direct or indirect transfers of real estate are exempt from tax. One condition for that exception to apply is that the transaction involves one controlling company and one or more controlled entities, requiring a direct or indirect shareholding of at least 95% to exist for five years before and after the transaction. If interpreted literally, this criterion cannot be met where the transaction involves a merger (where the controlled entity disappears) or a demerger (where the controlled entity is created) because the 95% shareholding would either not survive the transaction or would not exist prior to the transaction. Due to the complexity of the rule and the inconsistency of the current administrative guidance, the BFH has asked the Ministry of Finance to join the case and to provide its view on the rule.

Also worth noting is that the BFH has raised the issue that this intra-group exception might constitute state aid according to article 107 TFEU. The BFH has asked the Ministry of Finance to confirm if the rule has been notified as potential state aid or not. This issue, which has not been discussed in German literature, shows the increased importance of state aid in the area of direct taxation, which extends far beyond the current discussion on ruling practices.

Alexander Linn ( and Thorsten Braun (


Tel: +49 89 29036 8558 and +49 69 75695 6444


more across site & bottom lb ros

More from across our site

Premier League football clubs are accused of avoiding paying up to £470 million in UK tax, while Malta is poised to overhaul its unique corporate tax system.
Bartosz Doroszuk of MDDP offers insights on Poland’s new tax legislation on shifted profits, as the implementation deadline looms nearer.
Four tax specialists preview the UK’s transfer pricing requirements, which come into effect on April 1.
The rise of the QDMTT will likely change how countries compete on tax and transfer pricing policy, but it may not reverse decades of falling corporate tax rates.
ITR’s latest quarterly PDF is going live today, leading on the EU’s BEFIT initiative and wider tax reforms in the bloc.
COVID-19 and an overworked HMRC may have created the ‘perfect storm’ for reduced prosecutions, according to tax professionals.
Participants in the consultation on the UN secretary-general’s report into international tax cooperation are divided – some believe UN-led structures are the way forward, while others want to improve existing ones. Ralph Cunningham reports.
The German government unveils plans to implement pillar two, while EY is reportedly still divided over ‘Project Everest’.
With the M&A market booming, ITR has partnered with correspondents from firms around the globe to provide a guide to the deal structures being employed and tax authorities' responses.
Xing Hu, partner at Hui Ye Law Firm in Shanghai, looks at the implications of the US Uyghur Forced Labor Protection Act for TP comparability analysis of China.