International Tax Review is part of the Delinian Group, Delinian Limited, 8 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX, Registered in England & Wales, Company number 00954730
Copyright © Delinian Limited and its affiliated companies 2023

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Poland: Debt push down no longer tax deductible from 2018


Acquisition of Polish companies used to be structured via an acquiring Polish entity (limited liability company or a joint stock company) which was debt financed. Both before and after the merger of the acquisition and the target the interest on debt was tax deductible. It was limited with debt to equity thin capitalisation that applied only to selected related party debt. Interest on non-related party debt (bank loans) was fully tax deductible.

If the draft becomes law, from 2018 interest on debt financing for the acquisition of shares of the merged company will no longer be tax deductible against the profits of the merged company.

No transition period regulations have been provided, so the restriction will also apply to debt from previous years/past acquisitions and mergers.

Another type of cost that is expected to be non-tax deductible is any interest that exceeds approx. €680,000 ($806,000) per year and exceeds 30% of the company earnings before interest, taxes, and amortisation (EBITA). It will apply to both related and non-related party interest on a very broadly understood debt. Debt to equity ratio will not matter any longer. However, loans received before the end of 2017 will continue to benefit from the previous treatment for one more year. Companies with a tax year different from the calendar year can continue the previous approach until the end of the tax year which starts before the end of 2017.

Interest on profit participating loans will be never tax deductible for the borrower.

The €680,000 threshold is expected to apply to fees for intangible services (like advisory services, market research services, advertising services, management services and controlling, data processing as well as insurance, guarantees, and similar) but also payments for intellectual property rights acquired from related parties. Any such fees exceeding that threshold will be non-tax deductible for the part that exceeds 5% of EBITDA. What is important is that such costs will be fully tax deductible if they constitute a direct production cost of product/service or are recharged.

Some types of services (even if required from related parties, like accounting) are expected to be excluded from the limitations, but one should wait for the final version of the law and its formal interpretation.

Payments (royalties) for the intangible assets (like trademarks) will be not tax deductible if in the past the taxpayer was the owner of these assets, if part the royalties exceed the income achieved in the past from the disposal of the assets. This would mean that popular past structures of keeping intangibles separately from the operations may appear very inefficient for the company paying the royalties. Moreover, the owner of the intellectual property asset (if it is a Polish taxpayer) will not be allowed to treat as tax deductible the depreciation deductions from such value of the intellectual property assets that were previously owned by the taxpayer or the entity in which the taxpayer participated and which were disposed, in the part which exceeds the income from the disposal of the intellectual property assets.



Monika Dziedzic

Monika Dziedzic (


Tel. +48 22 322 68 88


more across site & bottom lb ros

More from across our site

The Brazilian government may be about to align the country’s unique system with OECD standards, but this is a long-awaited TP reform and success is uncertain.
Two months since EU political agreement on pillar two and few member states have made progress on new national laws, but the arrival of OECD technical guidance should quicken the pace. Ralph Cunningham reports.
It’s one of the great ironies of recent history that a populist Republican may have helped make international tax policy more progressive.
Lawmakers have up to 120 days to decide the future of Brazil’s unique transfer pricing rules, but many taxpayers are wary of radical change.
Shell reports profits of £32.2 billion, prompting calls for higher taxes on energy companies, while the IMF warns Australia to raise taxes to sustain public spending.
Governments now have the final OECD guidance on how to implement the 15% global minimum corporate tax rate.
The Indian company, which is contesting the bill, has a family connection to UK Prime Minister Rishi Sunak – whose government has just been hit by a tax scandal.
Developments included calls for tax reform in Malaysia and the US, concerns about the level of the VAT threshold in the UK, Ukraine’s preparations for EU accession, and more.
A steady stream of countries has announced steps towards implementing pillar two, but Korea has got there first. Ralph Cunningham finds out what tax executives should do next.
The BEPS Monitoring Group has found a rare point of agreement with business bodies advocating an EU-wide one-stop-shop for compliance under BEFIT.