All material subject to strictly enforced copyright laws. © 2022 ITR is part of the Euromoney Institutional Investor PLC group.

Canada: Finance Canada releases proposed investment limited partnership rules


The Department of Finance (Canada) released proposed draft legislation on September 8 2017 to amend the Excise Tax Act (Canada) (the ETA) in order to provide new investment limited partnership rules (the proposed rules). These rules would deem general partners that provide management and administrative services to such partnerships to have made taxable supplies subject to goods and services tax/harmonised sales tax (GST/HST).

The proposed rules may have a significant impact on the investment fund industry, notably in the manner in which the remuneration of a fund manager is structured.

Investment funds (funds) are commonly structured as a limited partnership with usually one general partner and many limited partners. The limited partners contribute cash and/or property and receive limited partnership interests entitling them to receive an agreed portion of any distributions. The general partner normally subscribes for a general partnership interest for a nominal amount. The general partner interest usually entitles the general partner to an agreed share of distributions, which could include a priority distribution (which is distributed in priority to any distribution that a limited partner may receive and would generally be a fixed percentage amount) and/or a carried interest that is a portion of the profit above some agreed threshold.

Under the proposed rules, an investment limited partnership is broadly defined to include, among other things, a limited partnership, the primary purpose of which is to invest funds in property consisting primarily of financial instruments if the partnership itself, or the arrangement or structure of which it forms a part of, is represented or promoted as a hedge fund, investment limited partnership, mutual fund, private equity fund, venture capital fund or other similar collective investment vehicle.

Management or administrative services include asset management services, which are defined to mean services of managing or administering the assets or liabilities of another person, providing research, analysis, advice or reports in respect of such assets or liabilities, determining which assets or liabilities are to be acquired or disposed of, or acting to realise performance targets or other objectives in respect of the assets or liabilities.

Often, the powers, duties and obligations of a general partner of a fund include all the services mentioned in the definition of the asset management service. Therefore, the proposed rules could effectively deem the general partner to be making taxable supplies to the fund with respect to such services and, in conjunction with existing provisions of the ETA, deem such supplies to have been made by the general partner to the fund for a fair market value consideration.

It is unclear how the fair market value consideration would be determined and whether funds and their general partners would have to conduct studies in order to determine the fair market value consideration for the asset management services rendered. There is also a real risk that the proposed rules will lead to greater audit scrutiny of distributions to the general partner (i.e. whether such distributions (or a portion thereof) would be viewed as part of the fair market value consideration for such services). In addition, the timing of such determination is unclear as the general partners may receive their distributions in different periods than when the asset management services are rendered.

As input tax credits would generally be unavailable for GST/HST paid by an investment limited partnership on these deemed taxable supplies, the proposed rules will result in a material increase to unrecoverable GST/HST paid by such partnerships. Although the proposed rules are not enacted yet, funds and their general partners must take into consideration these rules immediately as any consideration for management and administrative services performed by a general partner would be subject to GST/HST if such consideration becomes due on or after September 8 2017, or is paid on or after that day without having become due. The Canada Revenue Agency can also retroactively apply the proposed rules if all of the consideration for management or administrative services provided by a general partner became due or was paid before September 8 2017 and the general partner charged, collected or remitted any amount as or on account of GST/HST in respect of such services, on or before September 8 2017. The purpose of this retroactive application of the proposed rules is to eliminate any potential rebate claims for GST/HST paid in error on any management or administrative services provided by a general partner to an investment limited partnership for periods prior to September 8 2017.


François Auger



Julia Wang

François Auger ( and Julia Wang (, Montréal

Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP

Tel: +1 514 982 4117 and +1 514 982 4052


More from across our site

Japan reports a windfall from all types of taxes after the government revised its stimulus package. This could lead to greater corporate tax incentives for businesses.
Sources at Netflix, the European Commission and elsewhere consider the impact of incoming legislation to regulate tax advice in the EU – if it ever comes to pass.
This week European Commission officials consider legal loopholes to secure minimum corporate taxation, while Cisco and Microsoft shareholders call for tax transparency.
The fast-food company’s tax settlement with French authorities strengthens the need for businesses to review their TP arrangements and documentation.
The full ALP model will be adopted through a new TP regime, which is set to boost the country’s investments and tax certainty.
Tax professionals have called on the UK government to reconsider its online sales tax as it would affect the economy at the worst time.
Tax professionals have called on companies to act urgently to meet e-invoicing compliance targets as the EU plans to ramp up digitisation.
In the wake of India’s ambitious 25-year plan for economic growth, ITR has partnered with leading tax commentators to discuss what the future will look like for India and for the rest of the world.
But experts cast doubt on HMRC's data and believe COVID-19 would have increased the revenue shortfall.
EY’s plan to separate its auditing and consulting businesses might lessen scrutiny from global regulators, but the brand identity could suffer, say sources.
We use cookies to provide a personalized site experience.
By continuing to use & browse the site you agree to our Privacy Policy.
I agree