International Tax Review is part of the Delinian Group, Delinian Limited, 8 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX, Registered in England & Wales, Company number 00954730
Copyright © Delinian Limited and its affiliated companies 2023

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Germany: Possible tightening of RETT provisions


The German federal government and the federal states have set up a joint working group to examine the possibility of lowering the threshold that triggers the real estate transfer tax (RETT) in share deal transactions. In addition, some of the federal states in the upper house of Parliament launched their own initiative to ask the federal government to consider amending the RETT code based on future recommendations of the joint working group.

Under current rules, RETT is triggered on direct transfers of real estate and where 95% or more of the shares in a German real estate-owning company are directly or indirectly transferred to a new owner, or where 95% or more of such shares are directly or indirectly combined for the first time in the hands of a new shareholder. The same should apply if there is a 95% or greater change either directly or indirectly of the partners in a partnership.

The joint task force is considering three different models to lower the 95% threshold:

  • The first model consists of a straightforward reduction of the threshold to 75% or 50% of the shares in a real estate-owning entity that are directly or indirectly transferred or combined at the level of a new shareholder. The RETT would be assessed on the full amount of the special tax value. No further RETT would be triggered upon a subsequent increase of the shareholding percentage.

  • The second model would be based on a more graduated approach: if at least 50% of the shares are directly or indirectly transferred, RETT would be triggered on a pro rata basis. If there is a direct or indirect transfer of 75% or more of the shares, RETT would be triggered on the full amount. If an existing shareholding is increased and this increase triggers RETT, the RETT paid in previous transactions would be credited.

  • Under the third model, RETT generally would be triggered without a threshold (or a low 1% threshold) on a pro rata basis in the event of a share transfer.

Of the three models under discussion, the first appears to be the easiest to implement. The third model seems to be the most complex and there are concerns regarding the enforcement of this rule.

A lower RETT threshold could significantly affect taxpayers that own German real estate in their worldwide group. Both existing structures and ongoing transactions should be examined. Together with the uncertainty about the future of the intragroup restructuring exception in the RETT code (which currently is before the Court of Justice of the European Union regarding its compatibility with EU state aid rules, pending case C-374/17), it could create new hurdles for internal group restructurings of multinational groups.

It is unclear whether and when a proposal for a reduced RETT threshold will be introduced into the legislative process, also considering the outcome of the federal elections held on September 24, which made forming a new federal government more complex than usual.



Alexander Linn

Alexander Linn (


Tel: +49 89 29036 8558


more across site & bottom lb ros

More from across our site

The Brazilian government may be about to align the country’s unique system with OECD standards, but this is a long-awaited TP reform and success is uncertain.
Two months since EU political agreement on pillar two and few member states have made progress on new national laws, but the arrival of OECD technical guidance should quicken the pace. Ralph Cunningham reports.
It’s one of the great ironies of recent history that a populist Republican may have helped make international tax policy more progressive.
Lawmakers have up to 120 days to decide the future of Brazil’s unique transfer pricing rules, but many taxpayers are wary of radical change.
Shell reports profits of £32.2 billion, prompting calls for higher taxes on energy companies, while the IMF warns Australia to raise taxes to sustain public spending.
Governments now have the final OECD guidance on how to implement the 15% global minimum corporate tax rate.
The Indian company, which is contesting the bill, has a family connection to UK Prime Minister Rishi Sunak – whose government has just been hit by a tax scandal.
Developments included calls for tax reform in Malaysia and the US, concerns about the level of the VAT threshold in the UK, Ukraine’s preparations for EU accession, and more.
A steady stream of countries has announced steps towards implementing pillar two, but Korea has got there first. Ralph Cunningham finds out what tax executives should do next.
The BEPS Monitoring Group has found a rare point of agreement with business bodies advocating an EU-wide one-stop-shop for compliance under BEFIT.