European Union: Update on public CbCR
International Tax Review is part of the Delinian Group, Delinian Limited, 4 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX, Registered in England & Wales, Company number 00954730
Copyright © Delinian Limited and its affiliated companies 2023

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

European Union: Update on public CbCR

intl-updates-small.jpg
made.jpg

Bob van der Made

On June 12 2017, the European Parliament's joint ECON and Legal Affairs (JURI) Committee members adopted their joint report on the European Commission's draft directive on public country-by-country reporting (CbCR), with 38 votes in favour, nine against and no less than 36 abstentions, i.e. not exactly a slam dunk. The consolidated committee's compromise report will be published at the end of June or at the beginning of July.

The adopted report proposes to keep the European Commission's originally envisaged annual turnover threshold for large companies at more than €750 million ($845 million). However, a safeguard clause is introduced with the possible exemption for companies from disclosure on the grounds of "commercial sensitivity". This exemption would be annually renewable and will be monitored and reviewed each year by the EU Commission. Another new major feature in this in effect draft formal position of the European Parliament on public CbCR is the extension of the scope of the directive to non-EU countries as well (i.e. no longer only aggregate information would be required for a multinational group's activities in the rest of the world).

The ECON/JURI committee members of the European Parliament rejected the start of trilogue negotiations with representatives of the EU Council and of the EU Commission at this stage. Because of the many abstentions in the vote on this report, this approach makes perfect sense, also given that the public CbCR proposal is politically still going nowhere in the Council (the parallel track for the proposal) for now. No real progress is expected in the Council at the political level before the results of the German general elections to be held on September 24 2017 are known. The EU member states in the Council who are understood to oppose the Commission's public CbCR proposal, primarily but not only because of the key issue of the directive's legal basis, include Austria, Cyprus, Germany, Hungary, Ireland, Malta and Sweden.

As a first next step, the European Parliament's ECON/JURI committee report will be put to a confirmation vote in the European Parliament's Plenary Session (NB: new amendments to the report are possible) likely to be held in the Autumn of 2017.

Bob van der Made (bob.van.der.made@nl.pwc.com)

PwC EU Public Affairs-Brussels

Tel: +31 6 130 96 296

Website: www.pwc.com/eudtg

more across site & bottom lb ros

More from across our site

Yusuf Akhmadi of Indonesia’s Directorate General of Taxation reports on the country’s latest domestic and cross-border initiatives to clamp down on tax evasion
The new rate is a blow to Samsung, while two law firms have made significant tax hires into their respective Washington DC offices
Rema Serafi, KPMG’s first-ever female vice chair for tax, talks about breaking the mould in an exclusive interview with ITR
The metal multinational’s victory, in a case worth $12 million, continues the trend of companies coming out on top against India’s revenue department
Guy Bud and Matthew Greene from litigation firm Stewarts review a dispute on tiered partnerships, which raises questions on corporation tax and partnership law
The stagnating pay and tax bonuses cap follow slashed payouts for the deals team and business consolidation in the last month
A greater UN role has been secured after disagreements between developed and developing countries over the OECD’s influence in global tax reform
The US-based firm picks up investment fund specialist Ceinwen Rees, while Ireland nearly doubles its corporation tax receipts in three years
The order comes amid controversy over another of David Collard’s companies’ tax and TP affairs
NASSCOM, which represents over 3,000 Indian companies, has argued for the removal of the segmentation rule