Bosnia and Herzegovina: Law on financial operations
International Tax Review is part of the Delinian Group, Delinian Limited, 4 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX, Registered in England & Wales, Company number 00954730
Copyright © Delinian Limited and its affiliated companies 2023

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Bosnia and Herzegovina: Law on financial operations


Dajana Topic

The Law on financial business activities in Bosnia and Herzegovina (FBiH) was published in the Official Gazette of FBiH No. 48/16 in June 2016, while it became effective as of December 30 2016.

The law is the result of harmonisation of FBiH's legislation with the EU directives on combating late payments. The main purpose of the law, however, is to protect and upgrade the position of small and medium-sized companies acting as creditors in financial transactions, by reducing the lack of liquidity of debtors. Deadlines for fulfilling financial obligations between taxpayers and public entities are also regulated by this law, as are the consequences of missing those deadlines and the obligations of entrepreneurs in the event of a lack of liquidity.

The law applies to contracts concluded after the law entered into force and to business transactions carried out after December 30 2016.

Taxpayers to which the law applies include all legal entities that carry out activities in FBiH, who are aiming to operate with certain profit, as well as natural persons who independently carry out business activities. The financial institutions, insurance and reinsurance companies, investment funds and pension funds are not affected by this law.

Pursuant to Articles 8 and 9 of the law, the management of a company is obliged to undertake necessary measures in case the capital of a company becomes inadequate. The inadequacy of capital occurs in case if, on the day of the drafting of the financial statements, the loss in the current year, together with accumulated losses from previous years, has reached half of the company's share capital.

As far as financial obligations are concerned, Articles 10 to 16 of the law prescribe the following deadlines:

  • Up to 30 days for the payment in case a payment deadline is not contracted;

  • Up to 60 days if the payment period has been agreed in the contract; and

  • A longer term (up to a maximum of 360 days) can be arranged in writing, provided that the debtor issues an irrevocable bank guarantee or bill of exchange to creditor.

If the debtor fails to meet above deadlines, a fine ranging from BAM 5,000 ($2,900) to BAM 15,000 may be imposed.

Another important point that has been covered by this law, specifically in Articles 17 and 18, is the event of insolvency, which has been described as an event where the company/individual:

  • Has delayed the payment of salaries and related tax obligations for more than 30 days; and/or

  • Has delayed over 20% of its short-term obligations disclosed in the last year financial report for a period exceeding 60 days.

The insolvent company/individual is not entitled to perform any kind of payments, except those that are regulated by Article 18 of the law. Otherwise, the company/individual could be penalised with an amount ranging from BAM 5,000 to BAM 15,000.

The supervision of the enforcement of the law will be conducted by the tax authority of FBiH, as well as by the Federal Ministry of Finance through budgetary inspection.

Dajana Topic (, Banja Luka and Sarajevo

Eurofast Global

Tel: +387 51 961 610


more across site & bottom lb ros

More from across our site

Yusuf Akhmadi of Indonesia’s Directorate General of Taxation reports on the country’s latest domestic and cross-border initiatives to clamp down on tax evasion
The new rate is a blow to Samsung, while two law firms have made significant tax hires into their respective Washington DC offices
Rema Serafi, KPMG’s first-ever female vice chair for tax, talks about breaking the mould in an exclusive interview with ITR
The metal multinational’s victory, in a case worth $12 million, continues the trend of companies coming out on top against India’s revenue department
Guy Bud and Matthew Greene from litigation firm Stewarts review a dispute on tiered partnerships, which raises questions on corporation tax and partnership law
The stagnating pay and tax bonuses cap follow slashed payouts for the deals team and business consolidation in the last month
A greater UN role has been secured after disagreements between developed and developing countries over the OECD’s influence in global tax reform
The US-based firm picks up investment fund specialist Ceinwen Rees, while Ireland nearly doubles its corporation tax receipts in three years
The order comes amid controversy over another of David Collard’s companies’ tax and TP affairs
NASSCOM, which represents over 3,000 Indian companies, has argued for the removal of the segmentation rule