International Tax Review is part of the Delinian Group, Delinian Limited, 4 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX, Registered in England & Wales, Company number 00954730
Copyright © Delinian Limited and its affiliated companies 2023

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

South Africa: SARS confirms zero dividends tax rate in Swedish-South Africa DTA


Anne Bennett

In a binding private ruling, dated March 1 2017, the South African Revenue Service (SARS) confirmed that as a result of the most favoured nation (MFN) clause in the double tax treaty held between South Africa and Sweden, South African dividends tax is not payable on dividends declared by a local company to a Swedish resident shareholder.

Article 10 of the South Africa-Sweden tax treaty, read together with the 2012 Protocol to that treaty, provides that if South Africa concludes a treaty which allows for a lower rate of dividends tax than the South Africa-Swedish treaty does, that lower rate will apply to dividends paid from South Africa to Sweden. The Swedish treaty rate is 5%, subject to certain criteria being met.

A number of South Africa's tax treaties originally provided for a zero rate of dividends tax. Over time, the South African authorities have been renegotiating these treaties and only one treaty now remains that still provides for a zero rate. The tax treaty between South Africa and Kuwait provides that dividends paid from South Africa to a beneficial owner that is tax resident in Kuwait are taxable only in Kuwait. The Kuwait treaty, therefore, triggers the MFN provision in the Swedish treaty.

Although not directly relevant, the acknowledgement by SARS in this recent ruling of the beneficial impact of the MFN provisions in the South Africa-Swedish treaty is encouraging for South African taxpayers who have been requesting refunds from SARS of dividends tax paid on distributions made to the Netherlands. These claims are based on the fact that the South Africa-Netherlands tax treaty also contains a MFN provision. To date, SARS has not conceded that these refunds are due.

The MFN provision in the Dutch treaty applies if a treaty entered into after the Dutch treaty was concluded provides for a lower South African dividends tax rate than the Dutch treaty does. Differing interpretations exist as to the meaning of "concluded" in this context. On the assumption that the Kuwait treaty was concluded earlier than the relevant Dutch treaty provisions, it cannot be invoked directly to claim a zero dividends tax rate under the Dutch treaty. However, it is argued that the Swedish Protocol, which on all interpretations was concluded later than the Dutch tax treaty, has the effect of eliminating South African dividends tax on distributions to Dutch shareholders.

The argument runs as follows:

  • The Dutch-South Africa MFN provision is triggered if a treaty concluded by South Africa after the Dutch treaty provides for a lower rate of dividends tax;

  • The Swedish-South Africa Protocol was concluded after the Dutch treaty;

  • As result of the interaction of the Swedish and Kuwait tax treaties, as discussed above and confirmed by SARS, no dividends tax is payable under the South Africa-Swedish treaty; and

  • Consequently, qualifying Dutch resident shareholders are not liable for South African dividends tax.

These arguments have been upheld in the context of Dutch withholding tax by a decision of a Dutch lower court. It is only a question of time before a South African court rules on the same issue.

How long this opportunity exists (for Swedish and possibly also Dutch residents) is debatable. South Africa is in discussions with Kuwait to amend the treaty, presumably to increase the dividends tax rate and thereby close all MFN related windows.

Anne Bennett (

Webber Wentzel

Tel: +27 11 5305886


more across site & bottom lb ros

More from across our site

The General Court reverses its position taken four years ago, while the UN discusses tax policy in New York.
Discussion on amount B under the first part of the OECD's two-pronged approach to international tax reform is far from over, if the latest consultation is anything go by.
Pillar two might be top of mind for many multinational companies, but the huge variations between countries’ readiness means getting ahead of the game now, argues Russell Gammon, chief solutions officer at Tax Systems.
ITR’s latest quarterly PDF is going live today, leading on the looming battle between the UN and the OECD for dominance in global tax policy.
Company tax changes are central to the German government’s plan to revive the economy, but sources say they miss the mark. Ralph Cunningham reports.
The winners of the ITR Americas Tax Awards have been announced for 2023!
There is a ‘huge demand’ for tax services in the Middle East, says new Clyde & Co partner Rachel Fox in an interview with ITR.
The ECB warns the tax could leave banks with weaker capital levels, while the UAE publishes guidance on its new corporate tax regime.
Caroline Setliffe and Ben Shem-Tov of Eversheds Sutherland give an overview of the US transfer pricing penalty regime and UK diverted profits tax considerations for multinational companies.
The result follows what EY said was one of the most successful years in the firm’s history.