Brazil: Tax authorities issue guidance on the treatment of software as a service
International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 4 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX
Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2024

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Brazil: Tax authorities issue guidance on the treatment of software as a service

intl-updates-small.jpg

The Brazilian tax authorities attempt to resolve the withholding tax treatment of payments in relation to software, which has been a controversial issue for several years.

Giacobbo
Conomy

Fernando Giacobbo

Mark Conomy

On March 29 2017, the Brazilian tax authorities (RFB) published Solução de Consulta 191/2017 (SC 191/2017) (dated March 23 2017), confirming that withholding tax and Contribuição sobre Intervenção no Domínio Econômico (CIDE) should apply on payments made in relation to importations of software as a service (SaaS) from abroad.

The tax treatment of payments in relation to software has been a controversial issue over the years. Common issues include whether the software should be considered as an off-the-shelf product versus a customised technical service versus a royalty type license to use. Depending on the nature of the payments, the tax consequences can differ substantially, reinforcing the need for careful analysis and definition of what is being imported.

In the particular circumstances contemplated by SC 191/2017, the company making the importation of the SaaS was involved in the commercialisation of access/usage authorisations acquired from abroad for resale to users/clients in Brazil. The SaaS could be accessed by users from any computer/mobile device using a password. Authorisation for access occurred remotely via the internet where the users could access a databank in the 'cloud' rather than a determined location. The access authorisations contemplated two elements:

  • Network protection against viruses, spam and other threats; and

  • Access to online conferences, meetings, training and internet projects and information for real time sharing.

It was highlighted that while offered to clients on a broad basis, the SaaS was not a product made to order or a multiple-copy software that should be considered an off-the-shelf product. The RFB also clarified that in the present case, the SaaS being imported was a licence to use for resale as opposed to a license to commercialise/distribute.

The RFB examined the elements of what was being imported, concluding that the monthly payment for the SaaS was in consideration for diverse services similar to a package of utilities. When determining whether the SaaS should be considered a technical service, the RFB relied on the concept of a technical service set out in Normative Instruction 1,455/2014 which included activities rendered through automated structures with clear technological content within the relevant definition.

Pursuant to SC 191/2017, the RFB concluded that withholding tax and CIDE should be levied at source on amounts paid, credited, delivered, employed or remitted abroad as compensation for the SaaS, which they considered as technical services, depending on specialised knowledge in computer science and coming from automated structures with clear technological content.

By way of background, a Solução de Consulta is a formal response by the RFB to consultation made by a taxpayer and although this document does not represent legal precedent, it does provide further support and guidance for Brazilian entities in relation to how the RFB are treating such arrangements from a transactional tax.

Fernando Giacobbo (fernando.giacobbo@pwc.com) and Mark Conomy (mark.conomy@pwc.com)

PwC

Tel: +55 11 3674-2582 and +55 11 3674-2519

Website: www.pwc.com.br

more across site & bottom lb ros

More from across our site

As the firm declined to speak with ITR over its progress, senator Deborah O’Neill branded PwC Australia’s recent parliamentary responses as ‘unsatisfactory’
A Swedish company’s CEO working part-time in Denmark led to a noteworthy PE decision; in other news, Latham & Watkins grew its London tax team
Rather than outright replace human intelligence, AI solutions can serve as the ‘infinite intern’ tax advisers need to automate onerous tasks, argues Russell Gammon of Tax Systems
The lack of provision for bilateral advance pricing agreements is a notable omission from proposed reforms of Brazil’s transfer pricing rules
Ursula von der Leyen is under pressure to ensure her new team makes competitiveness a top priority. How tax policy is designed and implemented is crucial, writes Ralph Cunningham
Speaking exclusively at ITR’s Transfer Pricing Forum in Europe, the Commission’s Marc Clercx also addressed industry concerns over the arm’s-length principle
After a protracted offensive from 10 Australian professional bodies, a Senate motion to strike out contentious new tax ethical rules has failed, but concessions were secured
The closely watched decision represents the final nail in the coffin for Apple and serves as a warning to other multinationals, experts have suggested
UK tax advisers have branded Reeves’ pledge to cap corporation tax at 25% as “a smart move” and “an easy give”
In the wake of the global rankings release, we focus on the top performers across EMEA in the second of three regional analyses
Gift this article