All material subject to strictly enforced copyright laws. © 2022 ITR is part of the Euromoney Institutional Investor PLC group.

Indonesia: Will the amendments to the Income Tax Law simplify the rules?


Freddy Karyadi

Nina Cornelia Santoso

Since last year, the Indonesian government has planned to reform a number of tax policies, including an amendment to Law No. 7 of 1983 on Income Tax, which was last changed by Law No. 36 of 2008 (Income Tax Law).

As unveiled in various news, a tax reformation team has been formed to organise and supervise the process. The team has received several proposals on the amendment to the Income Tax Law from various entities including proposals to:

  • Reduce the income tax rate for entities, as proposed by the Fiscal Policy Agency (Badan Kebijakan Fiskal) (BKF) of the Ministry of Finance (MOF); and

  • Abolish the final income tax calculation for several sectors, among others, construction, property, gas station business, and micro/small/medium enterprises, as proposed by the Directorate General of Tax (DGT). The DGT suggested that the amendment to the calculation of the income tax for these sectors should be based on bookkeeping by the taxpayers, instead of stipulating a certain figure as a final rate. The BKF briefly stated that under the Income Tax Law, final income tax is imposed in such sectors because of the difficulties in collecting the tax and because it is a form of incentive for the taxpayers that is a better option than keeping books that are too detailed.

In relation to the proposal to abolish the final income tax calculation from the DGT, the BKF requested the DGT to elaborate and emphasise what impact this would have on state revenue, inflation, and the interests of entrepreneurs, stressing that this must all be considered. In response to this request, the DGT stated that the abolition will require each taxpayer to conduct detailed bookkeeping and record all of its income in any form, thus will ultimately increase the state revenue. If the final income tax is still imposed, the taxpayers must pay for income tax, whether or not they suffer a loss or gain a profit.

In addition to the above proposals, the DGT also suggested to:

  • Clearly stipulate income tax on e-commerce business in the amendment to the Income Tax Law; and

  • Revise transfer pricing provisions and amend tax facilities.

Clear provisions on income tax on e-commerce business are expected to encourage tax compliance by foreign e-commerce entrepreneurs that sell to Indonesian customers. As for tax facilities, more incentives, such as tax holiday or tax allowance, may be further stipulated to attract investors.

Further, there is also a plan to revise the requirements on dividends distribution derived from overseas investment through a controlled foreign company (CFC) owned by Indonesian taxpayers. The Indonesian government is concerned because there are cases where Indonesian taxpayers place investments in other countries, but the dividends derived are not distributed to Indonesia. In other words, the dividends are deliberately shifted to countries with low tax rates, resulting in tax avoidance.

To ensure conformity with international taxation laws, the BKF highlights compliance by Indonesian taxpayers by planning to stipulate better procedures of tax payment. Through the reformation, the Indonesian government is hoping to simplify the tax obligations and stipulate more flexible tax rates in the Income Tax Law. Details on the rates and calculations will be further specified under each implementing regulation. This will allow the Indonesian government to make quick adjustments in the event of any changes or developments in the future.

Despite being a long-standing plan, to date, the amendment to the Income Tax Law is still being discussed internally at the MOF. The final revision to the Income Tax Law is scheduled to be completed by this year.

On a separate occasion, the MOF enacted MOF Regulation No. 52/PMK.010/2017 concerning the utilisation of book value for the transfer and acquisition of assets in the framework of a merger, amalgamation, division, or acquisition of a business (MOF Reg 52) in April 2017. This regulation revoked and replaced MOF Regulation No. 43/PMK.03/2008 stipulating the same. The previous regulation only allowed the utilisation of book value for the transfer of assets due to a merger, amalgamation, and division. However, MOF Reg 52 has now included the acquisition of a business. In summary, MOF Reg 52 provides more detailed requirements to use the book value for the transfer of assets, including the procedures on obtaining approval from the DGT to use book value and the subsequent obligations of taxpayers having obtained the approval.

A quick update on regulations related to the exchange of information. Government Regulation in Lieu of Law (Peraturan Pemerintah Pengganti Undang-undang, or Perppu) No. 1 of 2017 concerning Access to Financial Information for the Interest of Taxation was enacted on May 8 2017. In general, the Perppu stipulates that the DGT is authorised to get access to financial information for the interest of taxation from financial services institutions in banking, capital market, insurance sectors, other financial services institutions and/or other entities categorised as financial institutions in accordance with exchange of financial information standard pursuant to international agreements related to tax.

The said institutions are required to submit:

  • Report of financial information for each financial account identified as financial account which must be reported; and

  • Report financial information for the interest of taxation, administered by them in one calendar year, to the DGT. The institutions must conduct financial account identification procedures comprising of a series of verification process in order for them to be able to generate data for the report.

The report shall be submitted electronically and/or manually (only for certain report by certain institution, to the extent that an electronic system is not yet available) to the DGT. Non-compliance with the reporting obligation is subject to criminal sanction in the form of fine up to a maximum of IDR 1 billion ($75,000).

In addition to receiving the above reports, the DGT is also authorised to request information and/or evidence or an explanation from financial services institutions, other financial services institutions, and/or other entities.

Freddy Karyadi ( and Nina Cornelia Santoso (, Jakarta

Ali Budiardjo, Nugroho, Reksodiputro, Law Offices

Tel: +62 21 250 5125


More from across our site

The state secretary told the French press that the country continues to oppose pillar two’s global minimum tax rate following an Ecofin meeting last week.
This week the Biden administration has run into opposition over a proposal for a federal gas tax holiday, while the European Parliament has approved a plan for an EU carbon border mechanism.
Businesses need to improve on data management to ensure tax departments become much more integrated, according to Microsoft’s chief digital officer at a KPMG event.
Businesses must ensure any alternative benchmark rate is included in their TP studies and approved by tax authorities, as Libor for the US ends in exactly a year.
Tax directors warn that a lack of adequate planning for VAT rule changes could leave businesses exposed to regulatory errors and costly fines.
Tax professionals have urged suppliers of goods from Great Britain to Northern Ireland to pause any plans to restructure their supply chains following the NI Protocol Bill.
Tax leaders say communication with peers is important for risk management, especially on how to approach regional authorities.
Advances in compliance tools in international markets and the digitalisation of global tax administrations are increasing in-house demand for technologists.
The US fast-food company has agreed to pay €1.25 billion to settle the French investigation into its transfer pricing arrangements over allegations of tax evasion.
HM Revenue and Customs said the UK pillar two legislation will be delayed until at least December 2023, while ITR reported on a secret Netflix settlement and an IMF study on VAT cuts.
We use cookies to provide a personalized site experience.
By continuing to use & browse the site you agree to our Privacy Policy.
I agree