Albania: Albania changes Law on Hydrocarbons

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement


Albania: Albania changes Law on Hydrocarbons

intl-updates-small.jpg
ndreka.jpg

Dorina Asllani Ndreka

By adopting Law No. 6/2017, the Albanian Parliament amended the 1993 Law on Hydrocarbons (Exploration and Production). These latest changes are intended to make the law more easily applicable and to bring it closer to the acquis of the EU. The amendments also focus on safeguarding these important public assets.

Law No. 6/2017, dated February 2 2017, includes several definitions that were not originally included in the 1993 law and its previous amendments. Some of the most interesting ones include the definition of the license agreement, which is the authorisation provided by the ministry responsible for exploration, development and the production of hydrocarbons in the contract area. This license includes the possibility to transfer the rights wholly or partially to a local or foreign legal person, or to an international financial institution. However, if it deems it necessary for matters of national security, the ministry may reject the transfer of the hydrocarbon agreement quotas.

It is worth noting that a hydrocarbon agreement may include specific clauses about the stability of the tax regime. A similar provision existed in the previous version of the law, but the new one provides the following conditions:

  • These clauses cannot exceed a term of 12 years from the date of the production's commencement;

  • The regime of stability excludes the laws and regulations related to national security, labour relations, protection of the nature and the environment, protection of human health and international treaties; and

  • The tax regime's stability provision does not affect the calculation and payment of applicable taxes by contractors under the tax legislation in force.

The stable tax regime, which is provided for under the new Law on Hydrocarbons, is defined to be the current one, including the tax rates, applicable forms, terms of payments and all other tax aspects as laid out in the current tax legislation in force.

The new law is effective from March 7 2017, but it will only be applied to new hydrocarbon agreements and will exclude those already signed and those that had started the process of negotiation before that date.

Dorina Asllani Ndreka (tirana@eurofast.eu)

Eurofast

Tel: +355 (0) 42 248 548

Website: www.eurofast.eu

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

It was also a memorable night for Galicia, KPMG, Skadden and Pinheiro Neto, all of which scooped major awards at a gala ceremony in New York
The former Deloitte UK CEO earned a 45% raise in a year when 1,000 staff reportedly lost their jobs – and the pay gap is only getting bigger
In a seminal development for big law, the 95-year-old firm is set to cease operations after a series of high-profile partner departures
UK Chancellor John Healey extended a VAT cut, suspended tariffs, increased a bank surcharge and vowed to increase funding for HMRC
Kristine Riisberg warned that TP decisions can determine top-up tax exposure under pillar two, while global consensus over the rules remains unsettled
Both Germany’s NIS2 and the EU AI Act now determine whether a tax function can meet its obligations – and both can make management personally accountable
Originators, loan purchasers and securitisation vehicles may need to revisit servicing agreements and pricing after a key judgment narrowed the VAT credit management exemption
Opening doors for existing talent within Baker McKenzie and a desire for enhanced legal capabilities informed Ricardo Perera’s switch from KPMG
Boaz Goren’s move to the upstart PE-backed firm takes the number of senior UK tax professionals who have left EY this year to 13
The allegations against Deloitte Cyprus raise uncomfortable questions about how far the big four can distance themselves from misconduct at member firms
Gift this article